ABSTRACT
Thyroid nodules (TNs) are prevalent and found in up to 50% of individuals. While most TNs are benign, some can be malignant. The evaluation of TNs is crucial to rule out malignancy and identify those requiring surgical intervention. This study aimed to clarify the reported prevalence of TNs, focusing specifically on their various types, assessment and diagnostic processes, current evaluation methods, and evidence-based management. It also provides recommendations for follow-up. TNs are typically found during physical exams or incidentally during imaging procedures. Routine laboratory and clinical evaluations of TNs are common. Ultrasound is the preferred imaging method to determine if a TN needs a biopsy. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is crucial in deciding whether surgery or surveillance is necessary. TNs that show suspicious features on the ultrasound may require cytologic analysis to assess the risk of malignancy. The effectiveness of several supplementary molecular tests is still uncertain, although some studies report promising results. The management and treatment approach for TNs primarily depends on the results of FNA cytology and ultrasound characteristics. The optimal treatment strategy for TNs ranges from straightforward follow-ups for low-risk cases to surgical intervention for high-risk patients. Rather than adopting a uniform approach, clinicians should assess each patient on a case-by-case basis using current knowledge and a collaborative, multidisciplinary method.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of the new International Diabetes Federation-Diabetes and Ramadan International Alliance (IDF-DAR) risk stratification tool for Ramadan fasting in predicting diabetic patients' ability to fast safely. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out during Ramadan 2022 at the Diabetes Center, King Fahad Hospital, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah, Saudi Arabia. The IDF-DAR risk stratification tool was used to calculate fasting risk for diabetic patients pre-Ramadan. The patients were allocated into 3 categories: high, moderate, and low risk. Fasting was left up to the patients and their healthcare providers. Participants filled out a log-sheet each day of Ramadan showing whether they completed the fast. A final interview was carried out after Ramadan to assess patients' fasting experiences. RESULTS: We included 466 patients with diabetes: 79.4% with T2DM and 20.6% with T1DM. Based on the IDF-DAR score, 265 (56.9%) patients were classified as high risk, 115 (24.7%) as moderate risk, and 86 (18.4%) as low risk. Non-fasting the whole month of Ramadan was statistically relevant to the IDF-DAR risk stratification score. High-risk individuals were more likely to experience hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia than those with a moderate or low risk. But overall, 70.4% of people at moderate risk and 53.2% of the ones at high risk observed Ramadan's complete fast. CONCLUSION: The IDF-DAR has proven to be reliable and valid for predicting the risk of adverse events associated with fasting in diabetic patients. Nonetheless, it might overestimate the risk of fasting for some patients.
