ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of ozone and low-level-laser therapy (LLLT) on postoperative pain after root canal treatment in symptomatic apical periodontitis on vital teeth. Eighty patients were divided into four groups using a web program as follows: LLLT placebo (mock laser therapy), LLLT, Ozone placebo (mock ozonated water irrigation), and Ozone. Postoperative pain levels for 7 days after treatment and percussion pain levels at the 7th day were recorded on the visual analog scale. A regression analysis, Cochran's Q test, Chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to analyze the data (P=.05). A regression analysis demonstrated that the most effective variables are "group" and "jaw" (P=0.01). Pain in the lower jaw is higher than the upper jaw. There was difference between the groups on postoperative pain at the days 1, 2, and 3; however, there was no significant difference on other days. LLLT and ozone groups had less postoperative pain and pain on percussion. Low-level laser and ozone therapy are useful methods on postoperative-pain in vital symptomatic teeth ,but they don't have superiority to each other.
Subject(s)
Chronic Periodontitis , Low-Level Light Therapy , Ozone , Periapical Periodontitis , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Ozone/therapeutic use , Periapical Periodontitis/radiotherapy , Periapical Periodontitis/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Root Canal Therapy/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the apical transportation of the ProGlider and ProTaper Next using 3 different motions (150° clockwise [CW]; 0° counter clockwise [CCW], 270° CW-30° CCW; and [360° CW] continuous rotation). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 36 simulated, curved, plastic training blocks were randomly distributed into 3 groups for treatment according to the movement kinematics used for ProGlider (Dentsply Maillefer) followed by ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer) instruments (n = 12): 150° CW-30° CCW, 270° CW-30° CCW, and 360° CW (continuous rotation). Pre- and post-instrumentation photographs were taken from the root canals in a standardized manner. Root canal transportation was calculated at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm from the apical terminus of the canal. Data were analyzed using a Kruskal-Walis H test (p = .05). RESULTS: At the 1- and 2-mm levels, both reciprocating motions (150° CW-30° CCW and 270° CW-30° CCW) resulted in less transportation than those of continuous rotation (p<.05). However, there were no significant differences between the groups at the 3-, 4-, and 5-mm levels (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both reciprocating motions were found to have less canal transportation than the continuous rotation group at the 1- and 2-mm levels. This is the first study about the use of the ProGlider and ProTaper Next activated by different motions. Reciprocating motion can be beneficial for ProGlider and ProTaper Next to reduce transportation of root canals.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the smear layer influences the removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal with manual or rotary instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The root canals of 48 freshly extracted single-rooted maxillary incisors were prepared to apical size 40 (n=40) and finally irrigated with sodium hypochlorite (group A), or ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) followed by sodium hypo chlorite (group B). 20 teeth were assigned to each group, while the remaining eight teeth served as positive and negative controls. Each group was divided into two subgroups of 10 teeth (subgroup I - calcium hydroxide was removed with master apical file; subgroup II - with profile file); and, in all removal procedures, citric acid was used for irrigation. The percentage of calcium hydroxide- [Ca(OH)(2)] coated surface area was calculated by image processing analysis. RESULTS: Considering the root canal as a whole, the removal of Ca(OH)(2) from the dentinal walls in group B showed significantly better results (P<0.05) as compared to group A. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, it can be concluded that the smear layer is important in the removal of calcium hydroxide.
ABSTRACT
Tenoxicam is an effective analgesic and anti-inflammatory agent for symptomatic treatment of various conditions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinically the effectiveness of prophylactic tenoxicam and prophylactic ibuprofen in reducing post-endodontic pain compared with placebo. A total of 48 patients consented to a double-blind, single dose, prophylactic oral administration of 20 mg of tenoxicam, 200 mg of ibuprofen, or a placebo before root canal treatment. The root canal treatment was performed in one visit. The patients registered their degree of discomfort on a 100-mm visual analog scale, immediately postoperative, and 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after initiation of root canal treatment. The two-way ANOVA test and Tukey HSD post hoc test showed that in the 6-h period, both 20 mg of tenoxicam and 200 mg of ibuprofen provided significantly better pain relief than the placebo. Prophylactic administration of a single dose of 20 mg tenoxicam or 200 mg ibuprofen before RCT provides an effective reduction at 6 h (P < 0.05). Because of the advantages of tenoxicam, it may be useful as a prophylactic analgesic when post-endodontic pain is anticipated.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Piroxicam/analogs & derivatives , Premedication , Root Canal Therapy/methods , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Calcium Hydroxide/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gutta-Percha/therapeutic use , Humans , Ibuprofen/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Piroxicam/administration & dosage , Piroxicam/therapeutic use , Placebos , Root Canal Filling Materials/therapeutic use , Root Canal Irrigants/therapeutic use , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Salicylates/therapeutic use , Sodium Hypochlorite/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: This clinical report describes the treatment of a left maxillary permanent incisor that had a complicated crown-root fracture with multiple fragments and a right maxillary permanent incisor which had an uncomplicated crown fracture. The 17-year-old female patient was presented to Ataturk University's Dentistry Faculty with posttraumatic injuries. The treatment plan included fracture segment reattachment, composite laminate veneer of the left maxillary incisor and composite restoration of the right maxillary incisor. The restorations were successful after 1-year follow-up according to the modified USPHS criteria. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The treatment of anterior region's traumas in a single appointment would provide patient's expectation as well as preventive of remaining dental hard tissues.