ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Large vessel occlusions (LVO) stroke is associated with cancer. Whether this association differs among patients with LVO that undergo endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) according to cancer type remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from consecutive patients that underwent EVT for LVO at three academic centers were pulled and analyzed retrospectively. Patients with LVO and solid tumors were compared to those with hematological tumors. Associations of cancer type with 90-day functional outcome and mortality were calculated in multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of the 154 patients with cancer and LVO that underwent EVT (mean age 74±11, 43% men, median NIHSS 15), 137 had solid tumors (89%) and 17 (11%) had hematologic tumors. Patients with solid cancer did not significantly differ from those with hematological malignancy in demographics, risk factor profile, stroke severity and subtype, and procedural variables. Outcome parameters including rates of favorable target recanalization and favorable outcome or mortality at discharge and 90 days post stroke were similar. Safety parameters including rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage also did not differ between the groups. On regression analyses, controlling for various prognostic variables cancer type was not associated with mortality or favorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the safety and efficacy of EVT in patients with malignancy does not depend on cancer type. Patients with malignancy should be considered for EVT regardless of cancer type.
Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Endovascular Procedures , Ischemic Stroke , Neoplasms , Stroke , Vascular System Injuries , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/therapy , Thrombectomy/adverse effects , Ischemic Stroke/etiology , Vascular System Injuries/etiology , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy , Brain Ischemia/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with stroke secondary to occlusions of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) often have poor outcomes. The optimal acute therapeutic intervention for these patients remains unknown. METHODS: Patients with isolated ACA-stroke were identified from 10 centers participating in the EndoVascular treatment And ThRombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (EVATRISP) prospective registry. Patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) were compared to those treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (OR; 95%CI) were calculated using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Included were 92 patients with ACA-stroke. Of the 92 ACA patients, 55 (60%) were treated with IVT only and 37 (40%) with EVT (±bridging IVT). ACA patients treated with EVT had more often wake-up stroke (24% vs. 6%, p = 0.044) and proximal ACA occlusions (43% vs. 24%, p = 0.047) and tended to have higher stroke severity on admission [NIHSS: 10.0 vs 7.0, p = 0.054). However, odds for favorable outcome, mortality or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ significantly between both groups. Exploration of the effect of clot location inside the ACA showed that in patients with A1 or A2/A3 ACA occlusions the chances of favorable outcome were not influenced by treatment allocation to IVT or EVT. DISCUSSION: Treatment with either IVT or EVT could be safe with similar effect in patients with ACA-strokes and these effects may be independent of clot location within the occluded ACA.
Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Endovascular Procedures , Stroke , Brain Ischemia/complications , Brain Ischemia/drug therapy , Cohort Studies , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Reperfusion , Stroke/drug therapy , Thrombectomy , Thrombolytic Therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Imatinib (Glivec(®)/Gleevec(®)) has shown long-term efficacy and safety in randomized trials. No large-scale studies have prospectively assessed the benefit-risk profile of an imatinib copy drug. We prospectively evaluated the response of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase in one institution. Patients with a complete hematologic response (n = 126) switched from branded imatinib to an imatinib copy drug. Subsequently, all patients switched back to the branded imatinib. Many patients in this study had a loss of hematologic response and tolerability issues with the imatinib copy drug. Hematologic response and tolerability improved upon retreatment with branded Glivec.
