Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 17: 2083-2092, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736539

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: Teleradiology is the practice of interpreting medical images acquired in an off-site location. Teleradiology has been utilized widely around the world to address the needs for subspecialty coverage, workload balancing, and as a solution for understaffing. This study aims to assess the perceptions of teleradiology among radiologists in Saudi Arabia, investigate any challenges they might face, and explore strategies that would help mitigate those challenges. Methods: A cross-sectional study using a self-administered electronic questionnaire was conducted to collect responses from radiologists practicing or having practiced teleradiology in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was conducted from January to June 2023, and 105 responses were included in the analysis. The responses were analyzed using chi-squared testing to investigate factors affecting the radiologists' perceptions. Results: The most common challenges for teleradiology were access to patients' health records, access to prior imaging exams, and concerns about image quality assurance. Around 74% of participants perceived teleradiology to be beneficial for geographic, after-hour, and subspecialties coverage. Teleradiology was also perceived to help reduce the turn-around time of radiology interpretations. Better communication with referring physicians and technologists was seen as a way to help improve teleradiology services. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the perception of teleradiology's challenges and benefits may not be influenced by experience, workplace, or subspecialty. Emphasis should be placed on the importance of quality assurance of images acquired remotely. Addressing the concerns and challenges related to access to patients' health records is also crucial to ensuring the successful implementation of teleradiology in the country.

2.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 21(3): 142-152, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32176453

ABSTRACT

Flattening filter free (FFF) linear accelerators produce a fluence distribution that is forward peaked. Various dosimetric benefits, such as increased dose rate, reduced leakage and out of field dose has led to the growth of FFF technology in the clinic. The literature has suggested the idea of vendors offering dedicated FFF units where the flattening filter (FF) is removed completely and manipulating the beam to deliver conventional flat radiotherapy treatments. This work aims to develop an effective way to deliver modulated flat beam treatments, rather than utilizing a physical FF. This novel optimization model is an extension of the direct leaf trajectory optimization (DLTO) previously developed for volumetric modulated radiation therapy (VMAT) and is capable of accounting for all machine and multileaf collimator (MLC) dynamic delivery constraints, using a combination of linear constraints and a convex objective function. Furthermore, the tongue and groove (T&G) effect was also incorporated directly into our model without introducing nonlinearity to the constraints, nor nonconvexity to the objective function. The overall beam flatness, machine deliverability, and treatment time efficiency were assessed. Regular square fields, including field sizes of 10 × 10 cm2 to 40 × 40 cm2 were analyzed, as well as three clinical fields, and three arbitrary contours with "concave" features. Quantitative flatness was measured for all modulated FFF fields, and the results were comparable or better than their open FF counterparts, with the majority having a quantitative flatness of less than 3.0%. The modulated FFF beams, due to the included efficiency constraint, were able to achieve acceptable delivery time compared to their open FF counterpart. The results indicated that the dose uniformity and flatness for the modulated FFF beams optimized with the DLTO model can successfully match the uniformity and flatness of their conventional FF counterparts, and may even provide further benefit by taking advantage of the unique FFF beam characteristics.


Subject(s)
Models, Statistical , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Photons , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods
3.
Med Dosim ; 45(3): 197-201, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31901300

ABSTRACT

The continuous delivery of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans is usually approximated by discrete apertures at evenly-spaced gantry angles for dose calculation purposes. This approximation can potentially lead to large dose calculation errors if the gantry angle spacings are large and/or there are large changes in the MLC apertures from one control point (CP) to the next. In this work, we developed a sliding-window (SW) method to improve VMAT dose calculation accuracy. For any 2 adjacent VMAT CPs ni and ni + 1, the dose distribution was approximated by a 2-CP SW IMRT beam with the starting MLC positions at CP ni and ending MLC positions at CP ni + 1, with the gantry angle fixed in the middle of the 2 VMAT CPs. Therefore, a VMAT beam with N CPs was approximated by a SW plan with N-1 SW beams. To validate the method, VMAT plans were generated for 10 patients in Pinnacle using 4° gantry spacing. Each plan was converted to a SW plan and dose was recalculated. Another VMAT plan, with 1° gantry spacing, was created by interpolating the original VMAT beam. The original plans were delivered on an Elekta Versa HD and measured with ArcCHECK. For both the isodose distribution and DVH, there were significant differences between the original VMAT plan and either the SW or the interpolated plan. However, they were indistinguishable between the SW and the interpolated plans. When compared with measurement, the average passing rates of the original VMAT plans were 87.3 ± 2.8% and 93.1 ± 1.0% for the 5 HN and 5 spine SBRT cases, respectively. On the other hand, the passing rates for both the VMAT1 and SW plans were above 95% for all the 10 cases studied. The dose calculation times of the original VMAT plans and the SW plans were very similar. We conclude that the proposed SW approach improves VMAT dose calculation accuracy without increase in dose calculation time.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Radiometry , Radiotherapy Dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...