Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Ascites/etiology , Eosinophilia/complications , Enteritis/complications , Rhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalSubject(s)
Enteritis , Eosinophilia , Gastritis , Ascites/etiology , Enteritis/diagnosis , Gastritis/diagnosis , HumansABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Hematoma/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Rectal Diseases/complications , Ulcer/chemically induced , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Rupture, Spontaneous , Suppositories , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/complications , Abdominal Pain/complications , IgA Vasculitis/complications , IgA Vasculitis/diagnosis , Intestinal Obstruction/complications , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnosis , Endoscopy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Glomerulonephritis/complications , Hyperglycemia/complications , Hyperglycemia/diagnosis , Leukocytosis/complicationsABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/diagnosis , Liver Diseases, Parasitic/diagnosis , Rectal Diseases/diagnosis , Rectal Diseases/parasitology , Schistosomiasis/diagnosisSubject(s)
Hematemesis/etiology , IgA Vasculitis/complications , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Humans , IgA Vasculitis/diagnosis , IgA Vasculitis/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Rectal Diseases/chemically induced , Rectal Diseases/complications , Ulcer/chemically induced , Ulcer/complications , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Rupture, Spontaneous , Sacrococcygeal Region , Suppositories , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
The small bowel leiomyosarcoma is a infrequent tumour in the clinical practice. We report the case of a 50 year old male admitted to the hospital on two occasions for gastrointestinal bleeding. On the second occasion a push enteroscopy located in jejunum a tumour. The pathologic diagnosis was a low grade jejunal leiomyosarcoma. The patient required a surgical intervention with resection of the affected portion of the jejunum.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Jejunal Neoplasms/complications , Leiomyosarcoma/complications , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
La enfermedad celíaca es una enfermedad sistémica autoinmune resultante de una intolerancia permanente al gluten. Se caracteriza por la presencia de una inflamación crónica de la mucosa del intestino delgado. Se puede desarrollar a cualquier edad y es relativamente común en adultos. La biopsia duodenal es todavía considerada por la mayoría de los autores la prueba "gold standard" en el proceso diagnóstico. La mayoría de los afectados muestran una remisión clínica sostenida con una dieta estricta libre de gluten, la cual debe mantenerse de forma indefinida toda la vida (AU)
Celiac disease is a autoimmune systemic condition resulting from the permanent gluten intolerante. It is characterized by the presence of chronic mucosal inflammation in the small bowel. It may develop at any age and is relatively common in the adult. Duodenal biopsy is still considered by most authors the gold standard in the diagnostic process. Most affected individuals show sustained clinical remission with a strictly gluten-free diet, which must be kept indefinitely for life (AU)
Subject(s)
Female , Adult , Humans , Celiac Disease/diagnosis , Celiac Disease/diet therapy , Glutens/adverse effects , Biopsy , Duodenum/pathology , Age of OnsetABSTRACT
El leiomiosarcoma de intestino delgado es un tumor infrecuente en la práctica clínica. Presentamos el caso de un hombre de 50 años que ingresó en el hospital en dos ocasiones por hemorragia digestiva. En el segundo ingreso una enteroscopia permitió localizar en yeyuno un tumor. El diagnóstico anatomopatológico fue de un leiomiosarcoma de yeyuno de bajo grado. El paciente precisó cirugía con resección de la porción de yeyuno afectada
The small bowel leiomiosarcoma is a infrequent tumour in the clinical practice.We report the case of a 50 year old male admitted to the hospital on two occasions for gastrointestinal bleeding. On the second ocassion a push enteroscopy located in jejunum a tumour. The pathologic diagnosis was a low grade jejunal leiomyosarcoma. The patient required a surgical intervention with resection of the affected portion of the jejunum
Subject(s)
Male , Middle Aged , Humans , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Intestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Intestine, Small/pathology , Leiomyosarcoma/pathology , Endoscopy, GastrointestinalABSTRACT
Introducción: La información es una parte importante del proceso asistencial, aunque en ocasiones puede ser inadecuada o deficiente.Objetivo: Detectamos una oportunidad de mejora en la inadecuada información de los pacientes que se realizan una endoscopia. El objetivo es evaluar y mejorar la calidad de la información.Método: Realizamos una primera evaluación con 100 pacientes procedentes de consultas, detectando desconocimiento de la técnica que se les va a realizar. Se aplican acciones de mejora, durante 4 meses, para realizar una segunda evaluación, con el mismo número de pacientes y evaluar mejoría respecto a la situación de partida. Resultados: Se ha detectado un déficit de información en el momento de indicar la endoscopia (poca información aportada por el médico prescriptor y en un número importante de casos no se aportaba consentimiento informado) y tras realizar la prueba, no aportando recomendaciones. Priorizamos nuestra actuación a este nivel con medidas de mejora y después de una nueva evaluación se determina una mejora significativa en estas situaciones.Conclusiones: Los estudios de nivel de calidad nos permiten detectar situaciones deficitarias y mejorar situaciones en los servicios de salud
Introduction: The information is an important part of the attendance process though in occasions it can be inadequate or deficient.Aim: We detect an opportunity of improvement in the inadequate information of the patients who carry out an endoscopia. The aim is to evaluate and to improve the quality of the information.Method: We realize the first evaluation with 100 patients proceeding from consultations, detecting ignorance of the technology. Actions of improvement are applied, for 4 months, to realize the second evaluation, with the same number of patients and to evaluate improvement with regard to the situation of item. Results: A deficit of information has been detected in the moment to indicate the endoscopia (little information contributed by the doctor prescriptor and in an important number of cases informed assent was not contributed) and after realizing the test, not contributing recommendations. We prioritize our action to this level with measures of improvement and after a new evaluation, a significant improvement decides in these situations.Conclusions: The studies of qualit level allow us to detect deficit situations and to improve situations in the services of health
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Endoscopy , Patient Education as Topic , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The information is an important part of the attendance process though in occasions it can be inadequate or deficient. AIM: We detect an opportunity of improvement in the inadequate information of the patients who carry out an endoscopia. The aim is to evaluate and to improve the quality of the information. METHOD: We realize the first evaluation with 100 patients proceeding from consultations, detecting ignorance of the technology. Actions of improvement are applied, for 4 months, to realize the second evaluation, with the same number of patients and to evaluate improvement with regard to the situation of item. RESULTS: A deficit of information has been detected in the moment to indicate the endoscopia (little information contributed by the doctor prescriptor and in an important number of cases informed assent was not contributed) and after realizing the test, not contributing recommendations. We prioritize our action to this level with measures of improvement and after a new evaluation, a significant improvement decides in these situations. CONCLUSIONS: The studies of qualit level allow us to detect deficit situations and to improve situations in the services of health.
