How do cancer cells replenish their fuel supply?

BACKGROUND: Multiple genetic changes, availability of cellular nutrients and metabolic alterations play a pivotal role in oncogenesis AIMS: We focus on cancer cell's metabolic properties, and we outline the cross talks between cellular oncogenic growth pathways in cancer metabolism. The review also provides a synopsis of the relevant cancer drugs targeting metabolic activities that are at various stages of clinical development. METHODS: We review literature published within the last decade to include select articles that have highlighted energy metabolism crucial to the development of cancer phenotypes. RESULTS: Cancer cells maintain their potent metabolism and keep a balanced redox status by enhancing glycolysis and autophagy and rerouting Krebs cycle intermediates and products of ß-oxydation. CONCLUSIONS: The processes underlying cancer pathogenesis are extremely complex and remain elusive. The new field of systems biology provides a mathematical framework in which these homeostatic dysregulation principles may be examined for better understanding of cancer phenotypes. Knowledge of key players in cancer-related metabolic reprograming may pave the way for new therapeutic metabolism-targeted drugs and ultimately improve patient care.

Cancer Rates in Adults After Cardiac Interventions: A Preliminary Observational Report.

BACKGROUND: The postprocedural state after cardiac revascularization interventions is characterized by intense inflammation and activation of inflammatory cytokines due to myonecrosis and ischemia/reperfusion injury. Involvement of similar processes also participates in cellular malignant transformation. In this study, the association between cardiac interventions and subsequent cancer risk development was therefore evaluated. METHODS: The 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer was examined in 2 cardiac care cohorts: all patients undergoing either open heart surgery or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) at hospitals in the commonwealth of Massachusetts. The observed cases of cancer were compared with the number of expected cases based on the state cancer rates, adjusting for sex and 5-year age groups. The standardized morbidity ratio (SMR) was used for this comparison. RESULTS: Of 10,301 patients in the surgical cohort, 804 (7.8%) incident cancers developed over 5 years of follow-up, whereas 245.7 incident cancers were expected. This yielded an SMR of 3.27 (95% CI, 3.05-3.51; P<0.0001). In the PCI cohort comprising 13,001 patients, 1029 (7.9%) incident cancers developed over 5 years, resulting in an SMR of 3.53 (95% CI, 3.32-3.75; P<0.0001). Excluding respiratory cancers from the analysis (to limit smoking-related cancers) reduced risk estimates only slightly. For the surgical cohort: SMR=2.80; 95% CI, 2.59-3.01; P<0.0001. For the PCI cohort: SMR=2.97; 95% CI, 2.78-3.18; P<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing heart revascularization procedures was associated with increased rate of cancer development as compared with the state general population. This cohort may warrant increased monitoring.