Fracture risk following bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bariatric surgery may negatively impact bone health. We aimed to compare fracture risk following bariatric surgery by type (malabsorptive, restrictive), or to non-surgical weight loss, or to controls with obesity. We systematically searched four databases from inception until October 2020. We included observational and interventional studies on adults. We screened articles and abstracted data in duplicate and independently and assessed the risk of bias. We conducted random-effects model meta-analyses (Review Manager v5.3), to calculate the relative risk of any or site-specific fracture (CRD42019128536). We identified four trials of unclear-to-high risk of bias and 15 observational studies of fair-to-good quality. Data on fracture risk following bariatric surgery compared to medical weight loss is scarce and limited by the small number of participants. In observational studies, at a mean/median post-operative follow-up > 2 years, the relative risk of any fracture was 45% (p < 0.001) and 61% (p = 0.04) higher following malabsorptive procedures compared to obese controls and restrictive procedures, respectively, with moderate to high heterogeneity. Site-specific relative fracture risk (hip and wrist) was one- to two-folds higher post malabsorptive procedures compared to obese controls or restrictive procedures. The risks of any and of site-specific fracture were not increased following restrictive procedures compared to obese controls. Fracture risk seems to increase following malabsorptive bariatric surgeries, at a mean/median follow-up > 2 years. The risk is not increased with restrictive surgeries. The available evidence has several limitations. A prospective and rigorous long-term follow-up of patients following bariatric surgery is needed for a better assessment of their fracture risk with aging.

Transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy for preoperative evaluation of the high-risk morbidly obese patient.

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an important facet of the preoperative evaluation for bariatric surgery. Morbidly obese patients are at high risk for airway complications during this procedure, and an attractive alternative is transnasal EGD. This report describes a series of patients evaluated successfully using this technique. METHODS: All patients undergoing preoperative transnasal small-caliber EGD for morbid obesity surgery between September 2004 and June 2005 at a Veterans Affairs Hospital were included in the analysis. The variables assessed were the adequacy of the examination, patient tolerance, the need for sedation, and the ability to perform interventions. RESULTS: The study enrolled 25 patients (17 men and 8 women) with an average age of 55 years (range, 44-63 years) and an average body mass index (BMI) of 47 kg/m2 (range, 38-69 kg/m2). All the patients met the 1991 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference Criteria for bariatric surgery and were undergoing preoperative evaluation. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (82%), diabetes mellitus (80%), and obstructive sleep apnea (68%). All 25 patients had successful cannulation of the duodenum's second portion with excellent tolerance. There were no sedation requirements for 23 (92%) of the 25 patients. Significant pathology was found in 14 (56%) of the 25 patients, including hiatal hernia (28%), gastritis (16%), esophageal intestinal metaplasia (16%), esophagitis (12%), gastric polyps (8%), gastric ulcer (4%) and esophageal varices (4%). Biopsies were indicated for 12 patients and successful for all 12 (100%). CONCLUSION: Transnasal small-caliber EGD is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional EGD for the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. It requires minimal to no sedation in a population at high risk for complications in this setting. In addition, this technique is effective in identifying pathology that requires preoperative treatment and offers a complete examination with biopsy capabilities. This technique should be considered for all morbidly obese patients at high risk for airway compromise during EGD.

The impact of preoperative weight loss in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is a widely performed bariatric operation. Preoperative factors that predict successful outcomes are currently being studied. The goal of this study was to determine if preoperative weight loss was associated with positive outcomes in patients undergoing LRYGBP. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients undergoing LRYGBP at our institution between July 2002 (when a policy of preoperative weight loss was instituted) and August 2003. Outcome measures evaluated at 1 year postoperatively included percent excess weight loss (EWL) and correction of co-morbidities. Statistical analysis was performed by multiple linear regression. P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The study included 90 subjects. Initial BMI ranged from 35.4 to 63.1 (mean 48.1). Preoperative weight loss ranged from 0 to 23.8% (mean 7.25). At 12 months, postoperative EWL ranged from 40.4% to 110.9 % (mean 74.4%). Preoperative loss of 1% of initial weight correlated with an increase of 1.8% of postoperative EWL at 1 year. In addition, initial BMI correlated negatively with EWL, so that an increase of 1 unit of BMI correlated with a decrease of 1.34% of EWL. Finally, preoperative weight loss of >5% correlated significantly with shorter operative times by 36 minutes. Preoperative weight loss did not correlate with postoperative complications or correction of co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative weight loss resulted in higher postoperative weight loss at 1 year and in shorter operative times with LRYGBP. No differences in correction of co-morbidities or complication rates were found with preoperative weight loss in this study. Preoperative weight loss should be encouraged in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.