ABSTRACT
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is rare in the pediatric population and typically arises from various causes. These include trauma (accidental, non-accidental, or birth-related injuries), coagulopathies (such as hemophilia or von Willebrand disease), vascular malformations (such as arteriovenous malformations), and complications from previous surgeries. These diverse etiologies contribute to the complexity of managing this condition. Although middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is proven effective in adults, limited studies have investigated its applicability in pediatrics. This study aims to assess the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of MMA embolization in the pediatric age group, guiding future research and treatment strategies. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. No restrictions were applied regarding publication status or follow-up duration. The inclusion criteria were studies that integrated MMA embolization as a treatment for cSDH in pediatric patients. Data extracted included patient sample and characteristics, cSDH etiology and characteristics, prior intervention, procedural technique and indication, and clinical and radiological outcomes. Twelve studies were included in the review, comprising a total of 14 patients. There were no randomized clinical trials or large-scale cohort studies. The included literature consisted of 11 case reports and one case series, and the results described a clinical and radiological outcome in a varied mix of patients with different characteristics and backgrounds for cSDH. No neurological complications attributed to MMA embolization were reported. Follow-up showed resolved or decreased size of cSDH in all patients except for one, who experienced hematoma expansion despite treatment. MMA embolization may be considered a primary or adjuvant treatment modality for cSDH in the pediatric population. However, further research is needed to investigate the impact of different etiologies on outcomes and to highlight long-term complications and results.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Disc herniation is a condition where tearing occurs in the outer annular layer of the intervertebral pad leading the inner gel-like material to bulge ouwards the spinal cord, due to the high load of the vertebrae. This will produce back pain and symptoms in different sites according to the level of the herniation in the vertebral column. AIM: To compare the level of awareness regarding disc herniation among the general population and medical students in Jeddah. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted through an electronic questionnaire to assess the level of awareness regarding disc prolapse among the general population and medical students in Jeddah. The questionnaire was in the Arabic language, it was taken and validated by the previous study which took place in Taif. RESULTS: Our studied sample involved 1026 individuals aged between 11 and 99 years, with a mean age of 34.03 ± 13.28 years old. More than half of the respondents were female (55.4%), most of them were Saudi nationals (90.1%), and most of them have received a higher education (67.7%). Results showed that 54.1% of the general population and 77.7% of medical students reported good knowledge regarding this condition. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the level of awareness regarding disc prolapse among the general population and medical students was poor in some respects such as: knowledge about the preventive measures, symptoms of the disease, the most common site in the spine affected by the disease, and the gold standard imaging method to diagnose this disease.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hydrocephalus is a worldwide disorder characterized by abnormal flow or rarely excessive production of cerebrospinal fluid, leading to the widening of the cerebral ventricles system due to the accumulation of the cerebrospinal fluid in the brain. Previous researches have shown that knowledge about the disorder is limited among healthcare providers and the population, affecting attitudes toward patients, as well as patient outcomes. AIM: To investigate healthcare providers and population's knowledge and attitudes towards hydrocephalus in Saudi Arabia. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted through an electronic questionnaire. The survey was self-constructed in Arabic and English by the research team and inspired by other awareness questionnaires and validated before use by three experts. RESULTS: There were 444 participants in this study, aged between 17 and 73 years with a mean age of 32.60 ± 10.98. Most of the participants were from the general population (74.8%). More than half of the participants had a bachelor's degree (60.1%). 38.4% of healthcare providers had negative knowledge while 61.6% had positive knowledge. In addition, 82.5% of the general population had negative knowledge, although 17.5% had positive knowledge. Moreover, it was observed that 17.0% of the healthcare providers had a bad attitude while 83.0% had a good attitude. In addition, 60.2% of the general population had a bad attitude, whereas 39.8% had a good attitude. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the level of knowledge and attitude towards hydrocephalus among healthcare providers was good on both aspects, while it was poor among the general population.
