Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Cardiovasc Dis ; 12(4): 233-239, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36147785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection in cardiac surgery is still common despite applying preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis as per guidelines. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the relationship between perioperative antibiotics serum levels and the incidence of surgical site infection. METHODS: This is a prospective study that included all adult patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting between June and December 2018. The serum antibiotics levels were measured at 4 different time points. The patients were divided into two groups: The group who developed surgical site infection and the group who did not develop surgical site infection. The serum antibiotics levels were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Eighty-seven consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. The overall rate of infection was 17.95% (14/78 patients). High pre-operative HbA1C levels were associated with a higher rate of SSI (SSI 8.46 ± 2.23 vs no SSI 7.28 ± 1.82, P = 0.04). Patients who developed surgical site infection had longer intervals between administration of prophylactic antibiotics and different parts of the procedure than those who did not develop infection T2 (SSI 3.09 ± 1.12 vs no SSI 2.32 ± 0.98, P = 0.004), T3 (SSI 5.74 ± 1.69 vs no SSI 4.68 ± 1.83, P = 0.024) and T4 (SSI 7.35 ± 1.97 vs no SSI 6.01 ± 2.11, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Prolonging different parts of cardiac surgery procedures could lead to higher risk of infection and better timing of intra-operative re-dosing of prophylactic antibiotics could be guided by measuring intra-operative serum concentrations of these antibiotics.

2.
J Card Surg ; 37(12): 4227-4233, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36040616

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The debate about the optimal mitral valve prosthesis continues. We aimed to compare the early and late outcomes, including stroke, bleeding, survival, and reoperation after isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR) using tissue versus mechanical valves. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 291 patients who had isolated MVR from 2005 to 2015. Patients were grouped into the tissue valve group (n = 140) and the mechanical valve group (n = 151). RESULTS: There were no differences in duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital stay, and hospital mortality between groups. Fifteen patients required cardiac rehospitalization, nine in the tissue valve group, and six in the mechanical valve group (p = .44). Stroke occurred in nine patients, five with tissue valves, and four with mechanical valves (p = .66). Bleeding occurred in 22 patients, seven patients with tissue valves, and 15 patients with mechanical valves (p = .09). Freedom from reoperation was 95%, 93%, 84%, 67% at 3, 5, 7, and 10 years for tissue valve and 97%, 96%, 96%, and 93% for mechanical valves, respectively (p˂ .001). The median follow-up was 84 months (Q1: Q3: 38-139). Survival at 3, 5, 7, and 10 years was 94%, 91%, 89%, 86% in tissue valves and 96%, 93%, 91%, 91% in mechanical valves, respectively (p = .49). CONCLUSIONS: Tissue valve degeneration is still an issue even in the new generations of mitral tissue valves. The significant risk of reoperation in patients with mitral tissue valves should be considered when using those valves in younger patients. Mechanical valves remain a valid option for all age groups.


Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Diseases , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Stroke , Humans , Mitral Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/etiology , Stroke/etiology , Reoperation , Aortic Valve/surgery
3.
Cureus ; 14(4): e24001, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35547440

ABSTRACT

Background Asthma is a reactive airway disease that has a high prevalence across the globe. Asthma exacerbations can occur due to various bacterial and viral infections that irritate nerve endings in the airways. With time, airway obstruction follows, and patients with asthma have various symptoms that occur intermittently. Asthma symptoms primarily include breathlessness, wheezing, coughing, and chest tightness. This research focused on the association between the Asthma Control Test (ACT) score and number of exacerbations per year. Methods  A questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study was conducted at the outpatient pulmonary clinic, King Abdulaziz Medical City, a tertiary hospital in Riyadh. The study included 227 adult patients who were diagnosed with asthma and had no other pulmonary diseases or other medical diseases that could mimic asthma exacerbation. Data was collected by direct interview with the patients and through the BESTCare system in King Abdulaziz Medical City. All the data were collected through Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US). The categorical data we used were presented by percentages and frequencies such as gender, whereas the numerical data were prescribed as mean and standard deviation such as age and number of exacerbations. For inferential statistics, Chi square was used to find the association between the categorical variable while T-test and ANOVA test were used to find the relationship between asthma control test score of asthmatic patients, which was divided into three different groups based on their scores that include: well-controlled, partially controlled, or uncontrolled, and the number of exacerbations per year.  Results A total of 227 adult asthma patients were enrolled in this study, most of them were females (72.7%). Average age of the participants was 47.3 ± 13.8 years. The average ACT score was found to be 18.5 ± 4.9 out of 25. Uncontrolled asthma was present in 26% of the patients, 22.9% were partially controlled and 51.1% had well-controlled asthma; to relieve the exacerbation most of the patients used salbutamol (51.5%), 35.2% used oxygen and 30.4% did not use any medication. Gender and age were not associated with ACT score (P = 0.787 and 0.797, respectively), whereas number of exacerbations was significantly associated with ACT score (P = 0.000), as fewer exacerbations were reported with higher ACT scores. Conclusion About one-quarter of the patients had uncontrolled asthma, slightly less than one-quarter of the patients had partially controlled asthma while more than half of the patients had well-controlled asthma. Number of exacerbations was found to be significantly associated with asthma control test score as fewer exacerbations were reported in well-controlled asthmatic patients.

4.
Surgery ; 166(6): 1128-1134, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31353080

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery has an increased risk of adverse events in obese patients. This increased risk might be explained in part by an increased intra-abdominal pressure and the development of intra-abdominal hypertension. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between obesity and intra-abdominal hypertension and to evaluate its possible impact after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting at a single center were selected prospectively before undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Based on the body mass index, 25 obese (body mass index ≥ 30) patients were matched with 25 control patients. Each patient had intra-abdominal pressure taken at baseline followed by one measurment every 4 hours until 24 hours after coronary artery bypass grafting. The serum markers for liver and kidney functions were collected once a day for 7 days after coronary artery bypass grafting. RESULTS: Obese patients had a greater (mean ± SD) peak intra-abdominal pressure (15.4 ± 1.6 mm Hg versus 10.6 ± 1.6 mm Hg; P = .011) and mean change of intra-abdominal pressure from baseline (5.1 ± 3.3 mm Hg versus 2.2 ± 2.4 mm Hg; P = .001). The mean abdominal perfusion pressure was less in the obese group (63.0 ± 8.0 mm Hg versus 70.1 ± 11 mm Hg; P = .017). The liver dysfunction, as determined by the Schindl liver function scoring system between the obese and control groups, was not statistically significant (28% vs 8%; P = .066). More patients in the obese group developed renal injury based on the calculated glomerular filtration rate (32% vs 8%; P = .034). Obesity was highly associated with developing intra-abdominal hypertension (odds ratio: 2.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.92-3.53; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with the development of intra-abdominal hypertension after coronary artery bypass grafting. This effect might indirectly impair the renal and liver functions through a decrease in the abdominal perfusion pressure.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...