Mycophenolate mofetil tolerability and dose changes in tacrolimus-treated renal allograft recipients.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduces acute rejection episodes (AREs) and may be associated with better renal graft survival than azathioprine. However, MMF-related adverse events are frequent; dose reduction or even withdrawal are quite common. Between 1999 and 2003, 115 renal transplantation patients were treated with tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids. An observational study was undertaken until graft loss (n = 7), death with a functioning graft (n = 2), or October 31, 2005 (mean follow-up-50 months). We assessed MMF dose reductions due to adverse events with the possible consequences on AREs and graft function. Treated acute ARE occurred in 11.3% of recipients, all of which were steroid-responsive. The median MMF initial daily dose was 1000 mg. In 44 patients (38.3%), the MMF dose was not changed; in 48 (41.7%) it was reduced; and in 23 (20%), withdrawn. The causes for dose modification were diarrhea (n = 33, 28.7% of all patients), leukopenia (n = 22, 19.1%), both of these (n = 7, 6.1%), or other events (n = 9, 7.8%). No AREs were attributed to MMF dose changes. Tacrolimus blood levels were higher at 3 years and serum creatinine values at 4 years among patients with dose changes (8.43 +/- 2.42 vs 7.37 +/- 2.23 ng/mL; P = .051 and 1.75 +/- 0.71 vs 1.48 +/- 0.38 mg/dL; P = .038, respectively). The need for MMF dose reduction or withdrawal was frequent in our patients with diarrhea or leukopenia during treatment with tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids. These adverse event-related changes were not associated with AREs, but produced deleterious effects on long-term graft function.

Interaction between omeprazole and tacrolimus in renal allograft recipients: a clinical-analytical study.

Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor with a number of pharmacokinetic drug interactions due to interference with cytochrome P450. Some studies show absence of relevant interaction between omeprazole and cyclosporine, but little is known about possible interactions between omeprazole and tacrolimus. In vitro studies suggest such interference, but no clinical data are available so far. We assessed interactions between omeprazole and tacrolimus among patients fulfilling two criteria: (1) renal allograft recipients receiving immunosuppression based on tacrolimus and acid-related disorder prophylaxis with omeprazole 20 mg/d since the day of the transplant procedure and (2) stopped omeprazole when it was considered unnecessary. Fifty-one transplant recipients received concomitant immunosuppression with MMF-prednisone (n = 47) or azathioprine-prednisone (n = 1), or rapamycin-prednisone (n = 2) or only prednisone (n = 1). omeprazole was stopped after 6.2 +/- 3 months of treatment. Tacrolimus doses and levels were recorded during 3 outpatient visits before omeprazole withdrawal (Pre3/Pre2/Pre1), at the withdrawal visit (Susp), and at 3 visits after withdrawal (Pos1/Pos2/Pos3). Weight gain was significant (72.5 +/- 13 kg Pre3; 73.4 +/- 13 kg Susp; 74 +/- 12.9 kg Pos3, P < .0001) and serum creatinine (SCr) decreased (1.70 +/- 0.49 mg/dL Pre3; 1.63 + 0.49 Susp; 1.58 +/- 0.48 Pos3, P < .0001). The progressive decrease in tacrolimus doses and levels was significant (ANOVA including the 7 visits <0.01 in all cases); whereas the level/dose ratio remained constant. Tacrolimus doses and levels continued a slow, progressive and significant decrease without any relevant change between visits during on versus off omeprazole. This clinical-analytical study supported the conclusion that an omeprazole-tacrolimus interaction is not clinically relevant. Despite possible competition or interaction at the molecular level, clinical management was not significantly affected in renal allograft recipients.

Cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation: selective prophylaxis and treatment.

We have reviewed our experience in selective cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection prophylaxis and treatment in our renal transplant population. Between 1996 and 2001, 263 cadaveric renal transplant recipients had at least 6 months follow up. Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine Neoral (n=108) or tacrolimus (n=155). CMV infection prophylaxis (oral acyclovir or gancyclovir at half usual doses) was only prescribed in recipients receiving a CMV positive ve kidney and in recipients treated with OKT3. CMV infection was diagnosed by a positive pp65 antigenemia upon appearance of CMV-related symptoms, leading to specific treatment (IV ganciclovir) only if symptoms were intense or there was visceral involvement. Thus, no preemptive treatment or programmed or periodic antigenemia was performed in any case. Nineteen episodes of symptomatic CMV infection were diagnosed (prevalence 7.2%). The frequency was similar for all immunosuppressive regimens. Only 9 of 19 (47%) of patients were given IV ganciclovir; the others were not treated. All patients survived without apparent complications, relapses, or recurrences. No oral gancyclovir was delivered after IV treatment. Our CMV prophylaxis protocol was limited to high-risk patients, using lower gancyclovir dosages than those usually advocated. It does not include programmed or scheduled search for CMV antigenemia in asymptomatic renal transplant patients. Despite these factors, our CMV infection rate and severity were similar to those reported with more aggressive protocols, with extended prophylaxis, preemptive therapy, or intense surveillance.

Terapia hormonal con parches de estrógenos para el tratamiento de la hemorragia digestiva recurrente en los pacientes urémicos

No disponible

Glaucolide B, A Molluscicidal Sesquiterpene Lactone, and Other Constituents of Vernonia eremophila.

The sesquiterpene lactone glaucolide B was isolated from the molluscicidal extract of VERNONIA EREMOPHILA Mart, and shown to be responsible for the molluscicidal activity. Hydrogenolysis of glaucolide B resulted in the disappearance of the activity. Other inactive constituents of the extract were 3,7-dimethoxy-5,3',4'-trihydroxyflavone and two transformation products, possibly artefacts, of glaucolide B. Glaucolide B exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against B, CEREUS and moderate activity against S. AURENS, but was inactive in several other systems.