Asynchronous electronic consultation between primary care and specialized care proved effective for continuum of care for viraemic hepatitis C patients / La consulta electrónica asíncrona entre atención primaria y atención especializada resultó eficaz para la continuidad de la atención a los pacientes con hepatitis C virémica

Introduction: It has been proposed that primary care diagnose and treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, a care circuit between primary and specialized care based on electronic consultation (EC) can be just as efficient in the micro-elimination of HCV. It is proposed to study characteristics and predictive factors of continuity of care in a circuit between primary and specialized care. Methods: From February/2018 to December/2019, all EC between primary and specialized care were evaluated and those due to HCV were identified. Variables for regression analysis and to identify predictors of completing the care cascade were recorded. Results: From 8098 EC, 138 were performed by 89 (29%) general practitioners over 118 patients (median 50.8 years; 74.6% men) and were related to HCV (1.9%). Ninety-two patients (78%) were diagnosed>6 months ago, and 26.3% met criteria for late presentation. Overall, 105 patients required assessment by the hepatologist, 82% (n=86) presented for the appointment, of which 67.6% (n=71) were viraemic, 98.6% of known. Finally, 61.9% (n=65) started treatment. Late-presenting status was identified as an independent predictor to complete the care cascade (OR 1.93, CI 1.71–1.99, p<0.001). Conclusion: Communication pathway between Primary and Specialized Care based on EC is effective in avoiding significant losses of viraemic patients. However, the referral rate is very low, high in late-stage diagnoses, heterogeneous, and low in new diagnoses. Therefore, early detection strategies for HCV infection in primary care are urgently needed.(AU)

Introducción: Se ha propuesto que atención primaria diagnostique y trate la infección por virus de la hepatitis C (VHC). Sin embargo, un circuito asistencial entre atención primaria y especializada basado en la consulta electrónica (CE) puede ser igual de eficiente en la microeliminación del VHC. Se propone estudiar características y factores predictivos de la continuidad asistencial en un circuito entre atención primaria y especializada. Métodos: Desde febrero/2018 y diciembre/2019 se evaluaron todas las CE entre atención primaria y especializada, y se identificaron aquellas por VHC. Se registraron variables para análisis de regresión e identificar factores predictores de completar cascada de atención. Resultados: De un total de 8.098 CE, 138 realizadas por 89 (29%) médicos generales de 118 pacientes (mediana de 50,8 años; 74,6% varones) fueron por VHC (1,9%). Noventa y dos pacientes (78%) fueron diagnosticados hace más de 6 meses), y el 26,3% cumplía criterios de presentación tardía. En total, 105 pacientes requirieron valoración por el hepatólogo. El 82% (n=86) se presentaron a la cita, de los cuales el 67,6% (n=71) eran virémicos, el 98,6% de los conocidos. Finalmente, el 61,9% (n=65) inició tratamiento. El estado de presentación tardía se identificó como un factor predictivo independiente para completar la cascada de atención (OR: 1,93; IC 95%: 1,71-1,99; p<0,001). Conclusión: La comunicación entre atención primaria y especializada basada en la CE es eficaz para evitar pérdidas significativas de pacientes virémicos. Sin embargo, la tasa de derivación es muy baja, elevada en diagnósticos en fase tardía, heterogénea y escasa en nuevos diagnósticos. Por tanto, se necesitan con urgencia, estrategias de detección precoz de infección por VHC en atención primaria.(AU)

Asynchronous electronic consultation between primary care and specialized care proved effective for continuum of care for viraemic hepatitis C patients.

INTRODUCTION: It has been proposed that primary care diagnose and treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, a care circuit between primary and specialized care based on electronic consultation (EC) can be just as efficient in the micro-elimination of HCV. It is proposed to study characteristics and predictive factors of continuity of care in a circuit between primary and specialized care. METHODS: From February/2018 to December/2019, all EC between primary and specialized care were evaluated and those due to HCV were identified. Variables for regression analysis and to identify predictors of completing the care cascade were recorded. RESULTS: From 8098 EC, 138 were performed by 89 (29%) general practitioners over 118 patients (median 50.8 years; 74.6% men) and were related to HCV (1.9%). Ninety-two patients (78%) were diagnosed>6 months ago, and 26.3% met criteria for late presentation. Overall, 105 patients required assessment by the hepatologist, 82% (n=86) presented for the appointment, of which 67.6% (n=71) were viraemic, 98.6% of known. Finally, 61.9% (n=65) started treatment. Late-presenting status was identified as an independent predictor to complete the care cascade (OR 1.93, CI 1.71-1.99, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Communication pathway between Primary and Specialized Care based on EC is effective in avoiding significant losses of viraemic patients. However, the referral rate is very low, high in late-stage diagnoses, heterogeneous, and low in new diagnoses. Therefore, early detection strategies for HCV infection in primary care are urgently needed.

Predictive factors for inadequate bowel cleansing in colon capsule endoscopy / Factores predictores de limpieza colónica inadecuada en exploraciones con cápsula endoscópica de colon

Background and aims: Achieving adequate bowel cleansing is of utmost importance for the efficiency of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). However, information about predictive factors is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive factors of poor bowel cleansing in the CCE setting. Methods: In this observational study, 126 patients who underwent CCE at two tertiary care hospitals were included between June 2017 and January 2020. Participants prepared for bowel cleansing with a 1-day clear liquid diet, a 4-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen and boosters with sodium phosphate, sodium amidotrizoate and meglumine amidotrizoate. Domperidone tablets and bisacodyl suppositories were administered when needed. Overall and per-segment bowel cleansing was evaluated using a CCE cleansing score. Simple and multiple logistic regression analysis were carried out to assess poor bowel cleansing and excretion rate predictors. Results: Overall bowel cleansing was optimal in 53 patients (50.5%). Optimal per-segment bowel cleansing was achieved as follows: cecum (86 patients; 74.8%), transverse colon (91 patients; 81.3%), distal colon (81 patients; 75%) and rectum (64 patients; 66.7%). In the univariate analysis, elderly (OR, 1.03; 95% CI (1.01–1.076)) and constipation (OR, 3.82; 95% CI (1.50–9.71)) were associated with poor bowel cleansing. In the logistic regression analysis, constipation (OR, 3.77; 95% CI (1.43–10.0)) was associated with poor bowel cleansing. No variables were significantly associated with the CCE device excretion rate. Conclusion: Our results suggest that constipation is the most powerful predictor of poor bowel cleansing in the CCE setting. Tailored cleansing protocols should be recommended for these patients.(AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos Lograr una limpieza intestinal adecuada es de gran importancia para la eficiencia de la cápsula endoscópica de colon (CEC). Se carece de información sobre factores predictivos. El objetivo fue evaluar los factores predictivos de la limpieza colónica deficiente en pacientes con CEC. Métodos: Ciento veintiséis pacientes fueron sometidos a CEC en dos hospitales de tercer nivel entre junio de 2017 y enero de 2020. La preparación consistió en un día de dieta líquida, y 4 l de polietilenglicol (dosis fraccionada), fosfato sódico, amidotrizoato de sodio y meglumina amidotrizoato. Ocasionalmente se administró domperidona y supositorios de bisacodilo. Se evaluó limpieza total y por segmentos. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística simple y múltiple para evaluar factores de limpieza deficiente y de excreción de la CEC. Resultados: La limpieza intestinal fue óptima en 53 pacientes (50,5%). Por segmentos fue: ciego y ascendente (86 pacientes; 74,8%), transverso (91 pacientes; 81,3%), distal (81 pacientes; el 75%) y recto (64 pacientes; 66,7%). En la regresión simple, la edad avanzada (OR, 1,03, IC 95% [1,01-1,076]) y el estreñimiento (OR, 3,82; IC 95% [1,50-9,71]) se asociaron con una limpieza deficiente. El estreñimiento (OR, 3,77; IC del 95% [1,43-10,0]) fue el único factor asociado de forma independiente. Ninguna variable se asoció a la tasa de excreción de la CEC. Conclusión: Nuestros resultados sugieren que el estreñimiento es el factor más potente de la limpieza deficiente colónica en el estudio endoscópico con CEC. Protocolos de limpieza adaptados se deben recomendar en estos pacientes.(AU)

An Enhanced High-Volume Preparation for Colonoscopy Is Not Better Than a Conventional Low-Volume One in Patients at Risk of Poor Bowel Cleansing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: We tested the hypothesis that an enhanced bowel preparation strategy (EBS) improves colonic cleansing in patients at high risk for inadequate bowel cleansing (HRI). Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial included consecutive HRI patients referred for outpatient colonoscopy between February and October 2019. HRI was considered if patients scored >1.225 according to a previously validated bowel-cleansing predictive score. HRI patients were randomized (1:1) to a low-volume conventional bowel cleansing strategy (CBS) (1-day low residue diet (LRD) plus 2 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus ascorbic acid) or to an EBS (3-day LRD plus 10 mg oral bisacodyl plus 4 L PEG). The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) was used to assess the quality of cleanliness. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were performed. A sample size of 130 patients per group was estimated to reach a 15% difference in favor of EBP. Results: A total of 253 HRI patients were included (mean age 69.8 ± 9.5 years, 51.8% women). No statistically significant differences were found in the BBPS scale between the two groups in the ITT analysis (CBS 76.8% vs. EBS 79.7%, P = 0.58) or PP analysis (CBS 78% vs. EBS 84.3%, P = 0.21), risk difference 2.9% (95% CI-7.26 to 39.16) in the ITT analysis, or risk difference 6.3% (95% CI-3.48 to 16.08) in PP analysis. No differences in preparation tolerance, compliance, adverse effects, or colonoscopy findings were found. Conclusion: EBS is not superior to CBS in hard-to-prepare patients. (EUDRACT: 2017-000787-15, NCT03830489). Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03830489.

Increasing the low residue diet to 3 days does not improve the bowel cleansing in hard to prepare patients: Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that the number of low residue diet (LRD) days does not influence the bowel cleansing quality in non-selected patients. However, there are not data in the subgroup of patients with risk factors of inadequate bowel cleansing. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether a 3-day LRD improved the bowel cleansing quality in patients with risk factors of poor bowel cleansing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial carried out between December 2017 and March 2018 in a tertiary care hospital. Patients with high risk of poor bowel cleansing were selected following a validated score. The patients were randomized to the 1-day LRD or 3-day LRD groups. All patients received a 2-L split-dose of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted for the main outcome. RESULTS: 135 patients (1-day LRD group=67, 3-day LRD=68) were included. The rate of adequate cleansing quality was not significantly different between the groups in the ITT analysis: 76.1%, 95% CI: [64.6-84.8] vs. 79.4%, 95% CI: [68.2-87.4]; odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% CI [0.54-2.73]) or in the PP analysis: 77.3%, 95% CI: [65.7-85.8] vs. 80.3%, 95% CI: [69.0-88.3]; OR 1.2, 95% CI [0.52-2.77]). Compliance with the diet or cleansing solution, satisfaction or difficulties with the LRD and the polyp/adenoma detection rates were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that 1-day LRD is not inferior to 3-day LRD in patients with risk factors of inadequate bowel cleansing.

Encuesta de adherencia al tratamiento en enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Estudio ENADEII / Survey of adherence to treatment in inflammatory bowel disease. ENADEII study

La tasa de no adherencia al tratamiento médico en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) está en torno al 50%, empeorando así los resultados de los tratamientos, la morbilidad y el coste. OBJETIVOS: Determinar mediante una encuesta online entre gastroenterólogos con especial dedicación a la EII el conocimiento sobre la adherencia al tratamiento de sus pacientes y los métodos utilizados para mejorarla. MÉTODOS: Desde la secretaría técnica de GETECCU se envió un correo a los socios con un enlace a la encuesta a través de un sistema online. RESULTADOS: Se invitó a 760 socios. Se obtuvieron 184 encuestas (28,5%). El 68% de los encuestados tenía publicaciones sobre EII indexadas, solo el 13% eran sobre adherencia. A pesar de que casi el 99% consideraban la adherencia como muy importante/importante, el 25% de los médicos no la medía. Pese a que el 100% consideraba que mejorar la adherencia implicaría un mejor pronóstico, el 47% no utilizaba sistemas para mejorarla. Los factores asociados con la medición y mejora de la adherencia fueron: hospital universitario (81,4%), que el paciente recibiera tratamiento combinado con tiopurínicos y biológicos (44,6%), médico de sexo femenino (63,1%), dedicar ≥ 6 h semanalmente a la EII (71,6%), que el médico tenga publicaciones indexadas sobre EII (68,5%) y sobre adherencia en EII (12,5%) y que el médico considere la adherencia importante o muy importante (98,9%). CONCLUSIONES: Aunque el conocimiento sobre la relevancia de la adherencia al tratamiento médico en EII está generalizado, entre los gastroenterólogos con dedicación especial a la EII que fueron encuestados casi la mitad no utiliza ningún sistema objetivo para cuantificarla. Se debe hacer un esfuerzo para cuantificar y mejorar la adherencia al tratamiento de estos pacientes

The rate of non-adherence to medical treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is around 50%, with the consequent negative impact on treatment results, morbidity and cost. OBJECTIVES: To determine through an online survey among gastroenterologists with special dedication to IBD, their knowledge about the adherence to treatment of their patients and the methods used to improve it. METHODS: An email was sent to gastroenterologists from the technical office of the Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis Spanish working group (GETECCU), with a link to the online survey. RESULTS: 760 physicians were invited. One hundred eighty-four surveys were obtained (28.5%). A total of 68% of respondents had indexed IBD publications, 13% of which were on adherence. Although almost 99% considered adherence as very important/important, 25% of physicians did not assess it. Even though 100% considered that improving adherence would imply a better prognosis, 47% did not use any system to improve it. The factors associated with the assessment and improvement of adherence were: university hospital (81.4%), combined treatment with thiopurines and biological drugs (44.6%), physician gender (female) (63.1%), dedicating ≥ 6 hours weekly to IBD (71.6%), previous published indexed papers on IBD (68.5%) and on adherence in IBD (12.5%), and considering adherence as important/very important (98.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Although knowledge about the relevance of adherence to medical treatment in IBD is widespread, among the gastroenterologists with special dedication to IBD who were surveyed, almost half do not use any objective system to quantify it. An effort must be made to quantify and improve adherence to the treatment of these patients

Survey of adherence to treatment in inflammatory bowel disease. ENADEII study. / Encuesta de adherencia al tratamiento en enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Estudio ENADEII.

The rate of non-adherence to medical treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is around 50%, with the consequent negative impact on treatment results, morbidity and cost. OBJECTIVES: To determine through an online survey among gastroenterologists with special dedication to IBD, their knowledge about the adherence to treatment of their patients and the methods used to improve it. METHODS: An email was sent to gastroenterologists from the technical office of the Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis Spanish working group (GETECCU), with a link to the online survey. RESULTS: 760 physicians were invited. One hundred eighty-four surveys were obtained (28.5%). A total of 68% of respondents had indexed IBD publications, 13% of which were on adherence. Although almost 99% considered adherence as very important/important, 25% of physicians did not assess it. Even though 100% considered that improving adherence would imply a better prognosis, 47% did not use any system to improve it. The factors associated with the assessment and improvement of adherence were: university hospital (81.4%), combined treatment with thiopurines and biological drugs (44.6%), physician gender (female) (63.1%), dedicating≥6hours weekly to IBD (71.6%), previous published indexed papers on IBD (68.5%) and on adherence in IBD (12.5%), and considering adherence as important/very important (98.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Although knowledge about the relevance of adherence to medical treatment in IBD is widespread, among the gastroenterologists with special dedication to IBD who were surveyed, almost half do not use any objective system to quantify it. An effort must be made to quantify and improve adherence to the treatment of these patients.

Impact of a 1-day versus 3-day low-residue diet on bowel cleansing quality before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether a 3-day low-residue diet (LRD) improved bowel cleansing quality compared with a 1-day LRD regimen. METHODS: Consecutive patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy were randomized to the 1-day LRD or 3-day LRD groups. All patients received a 2-L split-dose of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid. The primary outcome was bowel cleansing quality as evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) (adequate cleansing ≥ 2 points per segment). Secondary outcomes were adherence to and level of satisfaction with the LRD, difficulty following the dietary recommendations, and willingness to repeat the same LRD in the future. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted for the primary outcome. A superiority analysis was performed to demonstrate that a 3-day LRD regimen was superior to a 1-day LRD regimen with a margin of 10 %. RESULTS: 390 patients (1-day LRD group = 196, 3-day LRD = 194) were included. The cleansing quality was not significantly different between the groups: ITT analysis 82.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 77.4 to 88.0) vs. 85.6 % (95 %CI 80.7 to 90.5), with odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (95 %CI 0.72 to 2.15); PP analysis 85.0 % (95 %CI 79.9 to 90.1) vs. 88.6 % (95 %CI 84.0 to 93.2), with OR 1.4 (95 %CI 0.88 to 2.52). No differences were found regarding adherence to the diet or cleansing solution, satisfaction or difficulty with the LRD, and the polyp/adenoma detection rates. CONCLUSION: 3-day LRD did not offer advantages over 1-day LRD in preparation for colonoscopy.

Early Colonoscopy Improves the Outcome of Patients With Symptomatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Long waiting times from early symptoms to diagnosis and treatment may influence the staging and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. We analyzed the effect of colonoscopy timing on the outcome of these patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcome (tumoral staging and long-term survival) of patients with suspected colorectal cancer according to diagnostic colonoscopy timing. DESIGN: This study is an analysis of a prospectively maintained database. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the Open Access Endoscopy Service of the tertiary public healthcare center Hospital Universitario de Canarias, in the Spanish island of Tenerife. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients diagnosed of colorectal cancer between February 2008 and October 2010, fulfilling 1 or more National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence criteria, were assigned to early colonoscopy (<30 days from referral) or to standard-schedule colonoscopy at the discretion of the referring physician. Tumor staging (TNM classification) at diagnosis and long-term survival after treatment were compared in both strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the stage at presentation and overall survival, as determined by prompt or standard referral. RESULTS: Overall, 257 patients with colorectal cancer were diagnosed (101 at early colonoscopy and 156 at standard-schedule colonoscopy). TNM stages I and II were found in 52 (54.2%) and 60 (41.7%) patients in the early colonoscopy group and standard-schedule colonoscopy group. Stage IV was confirmed in 13 patients (13.5%) diagnosed in the early colonoscopy group and in 40 (28%) detected in the standard-schedule colonoscopy group. Survival rates at 12 and 60 months after treatment were significantly higher in the early colonoscopy group compared with the standard-schedule colonoscopy group (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Controlled randomization of early versus standard-referral colonoscopy, size and scope of analysis, the time interval from symptom onset to first physician assessment, and the different locations of colorectal cancer between groups were limitations of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy within 30 days from referral improves outcome in patients with symptomatic colorectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://journals.lww.com/dcrjournal/Pages/videogallery.aspx.

Risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation: a validated predictive score.

Background and study aim Inadequate bowel cleansing negatively affects the efficiency of colonoscopy in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to design and validate a predictive model for inadequate bowel cleanliness. Patients and methods The model was built from 667 consecutive outpatients (development cohort) who were prospectively scheduled for colonoscopy between June and September 2014. The validation cohort included 409 outpatients who underwent colonoscopy between October and December 2014. Cleansing was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Bowel preparation was administered on the same day as the examination. Results In the development cohort, BBPS was adequate in 541 patients (81.1 %). At multivariate analysis, antidepressants (odds ratio [OR] 4.25, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.91 - 9.47), co-morbidity (OR 3.35, 95 %CI 2.16 - 5.18), constipation (OR 2.09, 95 %CI 1.29 - 3.40), and abdominal/pelvic surgery (OR 1.60, 95 %CI 1.03 - 2.47) were independent predictors for inadequate cleansing. The model built with these variables showed an area under the curve of 0.72 in the development cohort and 0.70 in the validation cohort. A cutoff of 1.225 predicted inadequate bowel preparation with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 60.3 % (95 %CI 51.6 - 68.4), 75.4 % (95 %CI 71.6 - 78.9), 36.4 % (95 %CI 30.1 - 43.1), and 89.1 % (95 %CI 85.9 - 91.6) in the development cohort, and 50.0 % (95 %CI 38.1 - 61.9), 80.0 % (95 %CI 75.3 - 84.2), 35.7 % (95 %CI 26.4 - 45.6), and 87.9 % (95 %CI 83.7 - 91.3) in the validation cohort. Conclusion A simple score may assist the clinician in predicting which patients are at high risk of inadequate bowel cleanliness. This may guide changes in bowel preparation strategy accordingly.

Comparison of Two Intensive Bowel Cleansing Regimens in Patients With Previous Poor Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVES: Inadequate bowel cleansing is a major burden for endoscopy units. The aim of this study was to compare two intensive bowel cleansing regimens in patients with previous colonoscopy with inadequate bowel preparation. METHODS: Patients with inadequate cleansing at index colonoscopy were randomized to 4-L split-dose polyethylene-glycol (PEG) regimen vs. 2-L split-dose PEG plus ascorbic acid (PEG+Asc) regimen. All individuals underwent a 3-day low-residue diet and received 10 mg of bisacodyl, the day before colonoscopy. Cleansing was considered to be adequate if the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scored ≥2 at each colonic segment. A non-inferiority analysis was performed to demonstrate that colonic cleansing with 2-L PEG+Asc was not inferior to 4-l PEG, considering a non-inferiority margin of 10%. RESULTS: Adequate bowel cleansing was significantly higher in patients assigned to 4-L PEG regimen (n=127) vs. those randomized to 2-L PEG+Asc regimen (n=129) by intention-to-treat analysis (81.1 vs. 67.4%, odds ratio (OR) 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.163-3.689)) and by per-protocol analysis (86.6 vs. 71.7%, OR: 2.55, 95% CI: (1.316-4.922)). The study was terminated for futility after the interim analysis, because the 95% CI of the difference of proportions was 3.13-24.27% in the intention-to-treat analysis and 3.33-26.47% in the per-protocol analysis, confirming the superiority of 4-L PEG preparation. CONCLUSIONS: After 3-day low-residue diet and oral bisacodyl before colonoscopy, colon cleansing with 4-L split-dose PEG was superior to 2-L split-dose PEG+Asc in patients with previous inadequate cleansing. (EUDRACT: 2013-002506-31, NCT02073552).

Plasma matrix metalloproteinase 9 as an early surrogate biomarker of advanced colorectal neoplasia / Metaloproteinasa 9 como biomarcador plasmático de neoplasia colorrectal avanzada

INTRODUCTION: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are overexpressed at different stages of colorectal carcinogenesis and could serve as early surrogate biomarkers of colorectal neoplasia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of plasma MMP2 and MMP9 levels in the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia and their correlation with tissue levels. METHODS: We analysed blood and tissue samples from patients with non-advanced adenomas (n = 25), advanced adenomas (n = 25), colorectal cancer (n = 25) and healthy controls (n = 75). Plasma and tissue gelatinase levels were determined by Luminex XMAP technology and gelatin zymography. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate the optimum cut-off for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia. RESULTS: Plasma MMP2 levels were similar between groups whatever the type of lesion. Plasma MMP9 levels were significantly higher in patients with neoplastic lesions than in healthy controls (median 292.3 ng/ml vs. 139.08 ng/ml, P < 0.001). MMP9 levels were also higher in colorectal cancer than in non-advanced adenomas (median 314.6 ng/ml vs. 274.3 ng/ml, P = 0.03). There was a significant correlation between plasma and tissue levels of MMP9 (r =0.5, P < 0.001). The plasma MMP9 cut-off range with the highest diagnostic accuracy was between 173 ng/ml and 204 ng/ml (AUC = 0.80 [95% CI: 0.72-0.86], P < 0.001; sensitivity, 80-86% and specificity, 57-67%). CONCLUSION: Plasma MMP9 could be a surrogate biomarker for the early detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia, although its diagnostic performance could be increased by combination with other biomarkers

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las metaloproteinasas (MMP) son proteínas que se sobreexpresan en diferentes etapas de la carcinogénesis colorrectal y podrían ser biomarcadores de neoplasia colorrectal. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la utilidad de MMP2 y MMP9 en plasma para detectar neoplasia colorrectal avanzada y su correlación con los niveles tisulares. MÉTODOS: Se analizaron muestras de sangre y tejido en pacientes con adenomas no avanzados (n = 25), adenomas avanzados (n = 25), cáncer colorrectal (n = determinaron mediante tecnología xMAP Luminex y zimografía con gelatina. Se utilizaron curvas ROC para calcular el punto de corte óptimo para neoplasia colorrectal avanzada. RESULTADOS: Los niveles de MMP2 fueron similares en las distintas lesiones. Los niveles de MMP9 fueron significativamente superiores en los pacientes con lesiones neoplásicas comparados con controles sanos (mediana de 292,3 ng/ml vs. 139,08 ng/ml; p < 0,001). Los niveles de MMP9 fueron más altos en los cánceres colorrectales que en adenomas no avanzados (mediana de 314,6 ng/ml vs. 274,3 ng/ml; p = 0,03). Se observó correlación entre los niveles plasmáticos y tisulares de MMP9 (r = 0,5; p < 0,001). El rango de MMP9 plasma con mayor precisión diagnóstica fue 173-204 ng/ml (AUC = 0,80 [IC 95%: 0,72-0,86], p < 0,001; sensibilidad 80-86% y especificidad 57-67%). CONCLUSIÓN: Los niveles en plasma de MMP9 podrían ser un biomarcador útil para detectar neoplasia colorrectal avanzada. La combinación con otros biomarcadores podría aumentar su rendimiento diagnóstico

Plasma matrix metalloproteinase 9 as an early surrogate biomarker of advanced colorectal neoplasia.

INTRODUCTION: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are overexpressed at different stages of colorectal carcinogenesis and could serve as early surrogate biomarkers of colorectal neoplasia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of plasma MMP2 and MMP9 levels in the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia and their correlation with tissue levels. METHODS: We analysed blood and tissue samples from patients with non-advanced adenomas (n=25), advanced adenomas (n=25), colorectal cancer (n=25) and healthy controls (n=75). Plasma and tissue gelatinase levels were determined by Luminex XMAP technology and gelatin zymography. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate the optimum cut-off for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia. RESULTS: Plasma MMP2 levels were similar between groups whatever the type of lesion. Plasma MMP9 levels were significantly higher in patients with neoplastic lesions than in healthy controls (median 292.3ng/ml vs. 139.08ng/ml, P<0.001). MMP9 levels were also higher in colorectal cancer than in non-advanced adenomas (median 314.6ng/ml vs. 274.3ng/ml, P=0.03). There was a significant correlation between plasma and tissue levels of MMP9 (r=0.5, P<0.001). The plasma MMP9 cut-off range with the highest diagnostic accuracy was between 173ng/ml and 204ng/ml (AUC=0.80 [95% CI: 0.72-0.86], P<0.001; sensitivity, 80-86% and specificity, 57-67%). CONCLUSION: Plasma MMP9 could be a surrogate biomarker for the early detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia, although its diagnostic performance could be increased by combination with other biomarkers.

Uptake of Colon Capsule Endoscopy vs Colonoscopy for Screening Relatives of Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is limited by suboptimal uptake. We compared screening uptake of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) vs colonoscopy in this population. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 329 asymptomatic FDRs of patients with CRC who were randomly assigned to groups examined by CCE (PillCam, second generation; n = 165) or colonoscopy (n = 164) at a tertiary hospital in Spain from July 2012 through December 2013. Crossover was permitted for patients who did not wish to undergo the assigned procedure. Subjects assigned to CCE who had a significant lesion (polyp ≥ 10 mm, >2 polyps of any size, or CRC) were invited to undergo colonoscopy. RESULTS: One hundred twenty subjects in the CCE group and 113 in the colonoscopy group were eligible for inclusion. In the intention-to-screen analysis, uptake was similar between groups (55.8% CCE vs 52.2% colonoscopy; odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.44; P = .57); 57.4% of subjects crossed over from the CCE group, and 30.2% crossed over from the colonoscopy group (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.51-6.41; P = .002). Unwillingness to repeat bowel preparation in the case of a positive result was the main reason that subjects assigned to the CCE group crossed over; fear of colonoscopy was the reason that most patients in this group crossed over. A significant lesion was detected in 14 subjects (11.7%) in the CCE group and 13 subjects (11.5%) in the colonoscopy group (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.45-2.26; P = .96). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, similar numbers of FDRs of patients with CRC assigned to undergo CCE or colonoscopy agreed to participate, but most preferred to undergo colonoscopy. CCE was as effective as colonoscopy in detecting significant lesions; it could be a valid rescue strategy for subjects who reject screening colonoscopy. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01557101.

Controles de calidad de la colonoscopia como requisito de las campañas de cribado del cáncer colorrectal / Colonoscopy quality control as a requirement of colorectal cancer screening

La colonoscopia es la prueba diagnóstica y terapéutica en la que culminan las estrategias utilizadas en los programas institucionales de cribado del cáncer colorrectal, por lo que la eficacia de los mismos depende, en buena parte, de la calidad con que se lleve a cabo este procedimiento. En la evaluación de la calidad deben considerarse fundamentalmente la calidad científico-técnica, la seguridad, la satisfacción del paciente y la accesibilidad a la prueba. Los indicadores de calidad permiten determinar la variabilidad de su cumplimiento entre hospitales, unidades de endoscopia o endoscopistas e identificar a aquellos que no alcanzan los niveles recomendados. En España, el grupo de trabajo de calidad de la colonoscopia de la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología y la Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva elaboraron recientemente una guía de práctica clínica que aporta la evidencia disponible en torno a la calidad en colonoscopia de cribado, así como los requisitos básicos que deben cumplir las unidades de endoscopia y los endoscopistas que realizan este procedimiento. La implementación de programas formativos y la instauración de controles de calidad sobre la colonoscopia de cribado son medidas muy recomendables para garantizar el éxito de los programas poblacionales de cribado del cáncer colorrectal

The strategies used in population-based colorectal screening strategies culminate in colonoscopy and consequently the success of these programs largely depends on the quality of this diagnostic test. The main factors to consider when evaluating quality are scientific-technical quality, safety, patient satisfaction, and accessibility. Quality indicators allow variability among hospitals, endoscopy units and endoscopists to be determined and can identify those not achieving recommended standards. In Spain, the working group for colonoscopy quality of the Spanish Society of Gastroenterology and the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have recently drawn up a Clinical Practice Guideline that contains the available evidence on the quality of screening colonoscopy, as well as the basic requirements that must be met by endoscopy units and endoscopists carrying out this procedure. The implementation of training programs and screening colonoscopy quality controls are strongly recommended to guarantee the success of population-based colorectal cancer screening

[Colonoscopy quality control as a requirement of colorectal cancer screening]. / Controles de calidad de la colonoscopia como requisito de las campañas de cribado del cáncer colorrectal.

The strategies used in population-based colorectal screening strategies culminate in colonoscopy and consequently the success of these programs largely depends on the quality of this diagnostic test. The main factors to consider when evaluating quality are scientific-technical quality, safety, patient satisfaction, and accessibility. Quality indicators allow variability among hospitals, endoscopy units and endoscopists to be determined and can identify those not achieving recommended standards. In Spain, the working group for colonoscopy quality of the Spanish Society of Gastroenterology and the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have recently drawn up a Clinical Practice Guideline that contains the available evidence on the quality of screening colonoscopy, as well as the basic requirements that must be met by endoscopy units and endoscopists carrying out this procedure. The implementation of training programs and screening colonoscopy quality controls are strongly recommended to guarantee the success of population-based colorectal cancer screening.

Effects of colon capsule endoscopy on medical decision making in patients with incomplete colonoscopies.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is an orally ingested colon imaging tool used to evaluate patients with colonic disease. We evaluated the efficacy of CCE in helping physicians make decisions about patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopies (ICCs). METHODS: In a prospective study, we analyzed data from 34 patients with nonocclusive ICC who were eligible for CCE between May 2010 and April 2011; patients with colectomy, occlusive lesions, or inadequate bowel cleansing for the colonoscopy were excluded. Two experienced observers who were blinded to colonoscopy findings analyzed the CCE data. Four months later, medical records were reviewed to determine the effects of CCE on medical decision making. CCE was considered conclusive when the findings facilitated a medical decision. RESULTS: Bowel cleanliness was good or excellent for 22 patients (64.7%). CCE exceeded the most proximal point reached by conventional colonoscopy in 29 patients (85.3%). CCE findings allowed formulation of a specific medical plan for 20 patients (58.8%); 12 (35.2%) had irrelevant or no lesions, so the study was concluded; 7 (20.5%) underwent polypectomy or surgery for advanced colorectal neoplasia; and 1 (3%) was treated for Crohn's disease. Inconclusive CCEs resulted from poor preparation of the bowel (n = 12) and excessively slow (n = 1) or rapid (n = 1) capsule transit. CONCLUSIONS: CCE might be an alternative procedure to complete colon examination in patients with nonocclusive ICC.

Uso de Internet entre los pacientes con enfermedades digestivas en un hospital general / Internet use among patients with gastrointestinal diseases in a general hospital

Introducción Internet ha supuesto un cambio radical en el acceso a la información médica. No se ha estudiado el acceso a webs médicas en los pacientes con enfermedades digestivas en nuestro medio. Objetivo Determinar el nivel de acceso y el uso de Internet como fuente de información médica de los pacientes con enfermedades digestivas en nuestro entorno. Material y métodos Se encuestaron 699 pacientes consecutivos, ingresados y de consultas externas intra y extrahospitalarias de Digestivo. Resultados Respondieron 671 pacientes (55% mujeres), rango de edad 18 a 88 años, media de 54 + 16. Usaban Internet el 36%. No hubo diferencias por sexos, pero sí por edad (86% los mayores de 30 años vs 6% los mayores de 70, p<0,005). Buscaron más información los pacientes del hospital que los extrahospitalarios (77 vs 54%, p<0,005). Los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria utilizaron más Internet que el resto (57 vs 33%, p>0,005, OR 2,710 IC 1,628-4,511). La información le pareció menos fiable que la del médico al 77% de los hombres y al 70% de las mujeres. Al 86% le gustaría usar el correo electrónico con su médico. El 89% consideraban Internet útil para resolver dudas, el 89% querían direcciones de salud y el 90% información periódica sobre su enfermedad. Los pacientes no universitarios demandaban más información periódica (p = 0,01) y sobre cómo buscar información médica (p = 0,03). Conclusiones Una tercera parte de los pacientes con enfermedades digestivas utilizan Internet para informarse acerca de su enfermedad. Los pacientes quieren mayor información de su médico sobre recursos de salud en Internet (AU)

Introduction The internet has provoked a radical change in access to medical information. Access to medical websites among patients with gastrointestinal diseases has not been studied in our environment. Objective To determine the level of access and use of internet as a source of medical information in patients with gastrointestinal diseases in our environment. Material and methods We surveyed 699 consecutive patients, who were admitted to hospital or who were from intra- and extrahospital outpatient gastroenterology clinics. Results Responses were obtained from 671 patients (55% women), aged from 18 to 88 years, (mean 54 +16). Thirty-six percent used the internet. There were no differences between men and women, but differences were found by age (86% >30 years vs 6%>70, p<0.005). More inpatients sought information than outpatients (77% vs 54%, p<0.005). Patients with inflammatory disease used the internet more than the remaining patients (57% vs 33%, p>0.005, OR 2.710 CI 1.628-4.511). Seventy-seven percent of men and 70% of women believed the information was less reliable than that provided by the physician. Eighty-six percent of patients would like e-mail contact with their physician. Eighty-nine percent thought the internet was useful to resolve doubts, 89% wanted the addresses of health sites and 90% wanted to receive periodic information on their disease. Patients without a university education wanted more periodic information (p = 0.01) and more information on how to search for medical information (p = 0.03).Conclusions One-third of patients with gastrointestinal diseases use the internet to obtain information on their disease. Patients require more information from their physician on internet health resources (AU)

[Internet use among patients with gastrointestinal diseases in a general hospital]. / Uso de Internet entre los pacientes con enfermedades digestivas en un hospital general.

INTRODUCTION: The internet has provoked a radical change in access to medical information. Access to medical websites among patients with gastrointestinal diseases has not been studied in our environment. OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of access and use of internet as a source of medical information in patients with gastrointestinal diseases in our environment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We surveyed 699 consecutive patients, who were admitted to hospital or who were from intra- and extrahospital outpatient gastroenterology clinics. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 671 patients (55% women), aged from 18 to 88 years, (mean 54 +16). Thirty-six percent used the internet. There were no differences between men and women, but differences were found by age (86% >30 years vs 6%>70, p<0.005). More inpatients sought information than outpatients (77% vs 54%, p<0.005). Patients with inflammatory disease used the internet more than the remaining patients (57% vs 33%, p>0.005, OR 2.710 CI 1.628-4.511). Seventy-seven percent of men and 70% of women believed the information was less reliable than that provided by the physician. Eighty-six percent of patients would like e-mail contact with their physician. Eighty-nine percent thought the internet was useful to resolve doubts, 89% wanted the addresses of health sites and 90% wanted to receive periodic information on their disease. Patients without a university education wanted more periodic information (p = 0.01) and more information on how to search for medical information (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with gastrointestinal diseases use the internet to obtain information on their disease. Patients require more information from their physician on internet health resources.

Use of sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a nationwide survey in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal endoscopy causes discomfort and pain in patients. Sedation reduces anxiety and pain. Its use, however, continues to be a controversial issue and it varies greatly from one country to another. The use of sedation in Spanish gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) units is unknown. AIM: To determine the use of sedation in Spanish GIE units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 24-question survey on the use of sedation was distributed among 300 Spanish GIE units. RESULTS: Surveys were answered by 197 GIE units (65%), which had performed 588,326 endoscopies over the past 12 months. Sedation was used in more than 20% of gastroscopies performed at 55% of the GIE units, and more than 20% of colonoscopies were sedated at 71% of the units; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is almost always performed under sedation. The most common drugs were midazolam for gastroscopy and midazolam and pethidine for colonoscopy and ERCP; propofol is used by anesthetists; pulse oximetry is used at 77% of GIE units; 42% of the GIE units fill in a nursing record; 52% of GIE units have recovery rooms and 91% have a cardiac arrest trolley. CONCLUSION: The use of sedation in endoscopy varies greatly in Spain. It is seldom used in gastroscopy; it is more frequent in colonoscopy, and in ERCP it is the norm. In most GIE units sedation is controlled by the endoscopist with pulse oximetry. The most commonly used drugs are benzodiazepines, on their own for gastroscopy and combined with opioids for colonoscopy and ERCP.