Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 119
Filter
1.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 23(11): 537-45, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15625780

ABSTRACT

Airborne mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP) was studied for acute airway effects using a bioassay with BALB/c mice. Concentration- and time-dependent effects were obtained by continuous monitoring of the breathing pattern during exposure to 0.3-43.6 mg/m3 MEHP for 60 min. Additionally, inflammatory effects of MEHP were studied from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. MEHP showed no upper airway irritating effect. Lower airway irritation was apparent from a concentration-dependent decrease in tidal volume (shallow respiration) with a no-observed effect level (NOEL) of 0.3 mg/m3. The respiratory rate reached a maximum at about 8 mg/m3, demonstrating a rapid shallow breathing pattern. At concentrations above 4.9 mg/m3, the time of pause, another marker of lung irritation, increased concentration-dependently, resulting in a decrease in respiratory rate at high exposure levels. BAL fluid obtained from 0 to 72 hours after a 60 min exposure to 30 mg/m3 MEHP showed that the number of macrophage reached maximum about 16 hours after exposure. The NOEL was 1.7 mg/m3. BAL content of neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils and epithelial cells was normal after exposure to 30 or 1.7 mg/m3 MEHP. Based on worst case inhalation scenario in the general population, no airway irritation is expected from non-occupational levels of MEHP originating from DEHP.


Subject(s)
Diethylhexyl Phthalate/analogs & derivatives , Diethylhexyl Phthalate/toxicity , Irritants/toxicity , Lung/drug effects , Administration, Inhalation , Animals , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/cytology , Diethylhexyl Phthalate/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Irritants/administration & dosage , Lung/pathology , Lung/physiopathology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Respiratory Function Tests
2.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol ; 280(3): L565-73, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11159041

ABSTRACT

A method for the noninvasive measurement of airway responsiveness was validated in allergic BALB/c mice. With head-out body plethysmography and the decrease in tidal midexpiratory flow (EF(50)) as an indicator of airway obstruction, responses to inhaled methacholine (MCh) and the allergen ovalbumin were measured in conscious mice. Allergen-sensitized and -challenged mice developed airway hyperresponsiveness as measured by EF(50) to aerosolized MCh compared with that in control animals. This response was associated with increased allergen-specific IgE and IgG1 production, increased levels of interleukin-4 and interleukin-5 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and eosinophilic lung inflammation. Ovalbumin aerosol challenge elicited no acute bronchoconstriction but resulted in a significant decline in EF(50) baseline values 24 h after challenge in allergic mice. The decline in EF(50) to MCh challenge correlated closely with simultaneous decreases in pulmonary conductance and dynamic compliance. The decrease in EF(50) was partly inhibited by pretreatment with the inhaled beta(2)-agonist salbutamol. We conclude that measurement of EF(50) to inhaled bronchoconstrictors by head-out body plethysmography is a valid measure of airway hyperresponsiveness in mice.


Subject(s)
Bronchial Hyperreactivity/etiology , Bronchial Hyperreactivity/physiopathology , Hypersensitivity/complications , Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate , Tidal Volume , Administration, Inhalation , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/pharmacology , Albuterol/pharmacology , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Bronchial Hyperreactivity/chemically induced , Bronchitis/physiopathology , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/chemistry , Bronchoconstrictor Agents , Cytokines/analysis , Female , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunoglobulins/blood , Lung Compliance , Methacholine Chloride , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Plethysmography/methods , Pulmonary Gas Exchange , Respiration , Time Factors
3.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 19(8): 457-66, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11125716

ABSTRACT

The effects of airborne R-(+)- and S-(-)- limonene were studied in conscious BALB/c mice by continuous monitoring respiratory rate (f), tidal volume (VT) and mid-expiratory flow rate (VD) during an exposure period of 30 min. Both enantiomers decreasedf from a trigeminal reflex, i.e., due to sensory irritation. The exposure concentration decreasing f by 50% (RD50) in the first 10 min of the exposure period was estimated to be 1,076 ppm for R-(+)-limonene and 1,467 ppm for S-(-)-limonene. Results for sensory irritation of R-(+)-limonene in BALB/c mice and humans are in close agreement. The reported sensory irritation threshold is above 80 ppm in humans while the no-observed-effect level was estimated to be 100 ppm in mice. The enantiomers were devoid of pulmonary irritation or general anesthetic effects with R-(+)-limonene < or =1,599 ppm and S-(-)-limonene < or =2,421 ppm. R-(+)-limonene did not influence VT below 629 ppm. S-(-)-limonene increased VT above 1,900 ppm. Both enantiomers induced a mild bronchoconstrictive effect above 1,000 ppm.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Respiratory System/drug effects , Terpenes/toxicity , Administration, Inhalation , Animals , Atmosphere Exposure Chambers , Cyclohexenes , Humans , Limonene , Male , Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate/drug effects , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Respiration/drug effects , Respiratory System/physiopathology , Sensory Thresholds , Stereoisomerism , Terpenes/administration & dosage , Tidal Volume/drug effects
4.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 121(1): 57-67, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10686510

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mouse models have been established mirroring key features of human bronchial asthma including airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Acute airway obstruction in response to an allergen challenge, however, remains to be demonstrated in these models. OBJECTIVE: A mouse model of allergic lung inflammation was employed to analyze the development of specific (allergen-induced) and nonspecific (methacholine-induced) airway obstruction. METHODS: Mice were sensitized to ovalbumin (OVA) and challenged with OVA aerosol twice each week during four weeks. Changes in lung functions were determined by noninvasive head-out body plethysmography. The development of acute airway obstruction after OVA challenge and AHR after methacholine aerosol application were assessed by a decrease in the mid-expiratory flow rate (EF(50)). RESULTS: Two airway challenges were sufficient to induce AHR (5.7 vs. 15 mg/ml methacholine). Further OVA challenges reduced the baseline EF(50) from 1.85 to 1.20 ml/s (4th week) and induced acute airway obstruction. The OVA-induced obstruction was maximal in the 4th week (EF(50) = 0.91 ml/s). CONCLUSION: The development of acute airway obstruction in allergen-sensitized mice was demonstrated by means of head-out body plethysmography. In our model, AHR was observed before the development of airway obstruction.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/physiopathology , Asthma/physiopathology , Bronchial Hyperreactivity/physiopathology , Airway Obstruction/chemically induced , Airway Obstruction/immunology , Airway Resistance , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Asthma/chemically induced , Asthma/immunology , Bronchial Hyperreactivity/chemically induced , Bronchial Hyperreactivity/immunology , Bronchial Provocation Tests , Disease Models, Animal , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Immunoglobulin E/analysis , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate , Methacholine Chloride , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Ovalbumin/immunology , Plethysmography, Whole Body , Tidal Volume
5.
Arch Environ Health ; 54(5): 347-52, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10501152

ABSTRACT

The authors investigated the ability/potencies of 3 microbial volatile organic compounds and a mixture of 5 microbial volatile organic compounds to cause eye and upper respiratory tract irritation (i.e., sensory irritation), with an animal bioassay. The authors estimated potencies by determining the concentration capable of decreasing the respiratory frequency of mice by 50% (i.e., the RD50 value). The RD50 values for 1-octen-3-ol, 3-octanol, and 3-octanone were 182 mg/m3 (35 ppm), 1359 mg/m3 (256 ppm), and 17586 mg/m3 (3360 ppm), respectively. Recommended indoor air levels calculated from the individual RD50 values for 1-octen-3-ol, 3-octanol, and 3-octanone were 100, 1000, and 13000 microg/m3, respectively-values considerably higher than the reported measured indoor air levels for these compounds. The RD50 value for a mixture of 5 microbial volatile organic compounds was also determined and found to be 3.6 times lower than estimated from the fractional concentrations and the respective RD50s of the individual components. The data support the conclusion that a variety of microbial volatile organic compounds may have some synergistic effects for the sensory irritation response, which constrains the interpretation and application of recommended indoor air levels of individual microbial volatile organic compounds. The results also showed that if a particular component of a mixture was much more potent than the other components, it may dominate the sensory irritation effect. With respect to irritation symptoms reported in moldy houses, the results of this study indicate that the contribution of microbial volatile organic compounds to these symptoms seems less than previously supposed.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Air Pollution, Indoor , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Respiration/drug effects , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced , Air Microbiology , Animals , Biological Assay , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Fungi/metabolism , Irritants/adverse effects , Ketones/adverse effects , Male , Mice , Octanols/adverse effects
6.
Hum Exp Toxicol ; 18(6): 400-9, 1999 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10413245

ABSTRACT

1. Concentration and time-effect relationships of formaldehyde and ozone on the airways were investigated in BALB/c mice. The effects were obtained by continuous monitoring of the respiratory rate, tidal volume, expiratory flow rate, time of inspiration, time of expiration, and respiratory patterns. 2. With concentrations up to 4 p.p.m., formaldehyde showed mainly sensory irritation effects of the upper airways that decrease the respiratory rate from a trigeminal reflex. The no-effect level (NOEL) was about 0.3 p.p.m. This value is close to the human NOEL, which is about 0.08 p.p.m. 3. Ozone caused rapid, shallow breathing in BALB/c mice. Later on, the respiratory rate decreased due to another vagal response that indicated an incipient lung oedema. The NOEL in mice was about 1 p.p.m. during 30 min of ozone exposure. No major effect occurs in resting humans at about 0.4 p.p.m. 4. Thus, the upper airway irritant, formaldehyde, and the deep lung irritant, ozone, showed the same types of respiratory effects in humans and in BALB/c mice. Also, the sensitivity was nearly identical. Continuous monitoring of respiratory effects in BALB/c mice, therefore, may be a valuable method for the study of effects of other environmental pollutants, which, however, should be confirmed in further studies.


Subject(s)
Bronchi/drug effects , Formaldehyde/toxicity , Inhalation Exposure , Irritants/toxicity , Oxidants, Photochemical/toxicity , Ozone/toxicity , Animals , Bronchoconstriction/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Formaldehyde/pharmacokinetics , Irritants/pharmacokinetics , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Oxidants, Photochemical/pharmacokinetics , Ozone/pharmacokinetics , Respiration/drug effects
7.
J Toxicol Environ Health A ; 57(2): 89-114, 1999 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10344226

ABSTRACT

The standard mouse bioassay was used for obtaining the RD50 (i.e., the concentration that causes a 50% decrease in respiratory frequency) and for estimating the irritation properties of d-delta3-carene (i.e., (+)-delta3-carene) and commercial turpentine. The chemicals studied possess mainly sensory irritation properties similar to the previously studied monoterpenes, pinenes. The irritation potency of d-delta3-carene (RD50 = 1345 ppm) was almost equal to that of d-pinenes. Thus, d-delta3-carene was about four times more potent as a sensory irritant than I-beta-pinene, whereas the difference with I-alpha-pinene was more marked; as a sensory irritant, I-alpha-pinene is almost inactive. Based on sensory irritation potency and physicochemical and structural properties of pinenes and delta3-carene, the potency of a closely related monoterpene, limonene, is discussed. For commercial turpentine, a mixture of monoterpenes (mainly d-delta3-carene, I-beta-pinene, alpha-pinenes, and limonenes), the RD50 (1173 ppm) was the same order of magnitude as those of d-pinenes and d-delta3-carene. Apparently, d-monoterpenes are responsible for the sensory irritation caused by turpentine. In the wood industry and in the indoor air of nonindustrial environments, monoterpenes are thought to be one of the causative agents for irritation symptoms. The occupational exposure limit (OEL) of turpentine (100 ppm in Finland and the United States) is also used for individual monoterpenes, excluding limonene. Using results from this and our previous study, proposed OELs and recommended indoor levels (RILs) for selected monoterpenes and turpentine were determined based on their RD50 values. According to our studies, the present OEL of turpentine (100 ppm; 560 mg/m3) in Finland and in the United States seems to be suitable only for I-pinenes. For d-monoterpenes and turpentine, an OEL about three times lower is suggested. Our results show that recommended indoor levels (RILs) for monoterpenes are high compared to the concentrations measured indoors in nonindustrial environments. Thus, it is very unlikely that monoterpenes alone can cause irritation symptoms in homes or offices under normal conditions.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects , Irritants/toxicity , Monoterpenes , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Terpenes/toxicity , Turpentine/toxicity , Air/analysis , Anesthesia , Animals , Bicyclic Monoterpenes , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Lung/pathology , Lung/physiopathology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred Strains , Models, Molecular , Respiratory Mechanics/drug effects
8.
Pharmacol Toxicol ; 83(6): 270-9, 1998 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9868746

ABSTRACT

The Ferguson principle has been widely used in toxicology to separate or indicate possible mechanisms for acute toxic effects of chemicals. However, this principle has never been adequately tested because of the lack of a database containing a sufficient number of both types of chemicals, non-reactive and reactive, that the Ferguson principle purports to separate. Such a database is now available. In this report a theoretical framework for the Ferguson principle is presented, regarding one of the acute toxicological effects of volatile airborne chemicals: sensory irritation. Previously obtained results on series of non-reactive and reactive chemicals are then used to demonstrate that the Ferguson principle can be extended to reactive chemicals by adding chemical reactivity descriptors to the physicochemical descriptors required by the Ferguson principle. This approach can be successful, provided that specific chemical reactivity mechanisms can be identified for the reactive chemicals of concern. The findings suggest that it is possible to replace the empirical Ferguson principle by formal mechanistic equations which will provide a better foundation for the understanding of the mechanisms by which airborne sensory irritants exert their action.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/pharmacology , Irritants/pharmacology , Models, Chemical , Respiration/drug effects , Animals , Mathematics , Mice
9.
Arch Toxicol ; 72(8): 514-23, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9765067

ABSTRACT

To clarify the existence of a receptor protein for sensory irritants in trigeminal nerve endings, D- [i.e. (+)] and L- [i.e. (-)] enantiomers of alpha- and beta-pinene as models of nonreactive chemicals were evaluated for their potency in outbred OF1 and NIH/S mice using ASTM E981-84 bioassay. All pinenes possess sensory irritation properties and also induced sedation and signs of anaesthesia but had no pulmonary irritation effects. According to the ratio of RD50 (i.e. concentration which causes a 50% decrease in respiratory rate,f) and vapour pressure (Po), all pinenes are nonreactive chemicals. For nonreactive chemicals, Po and olive oil-gas partition (Loil) can be used to estimate their potency as sensory irritant. Thus, for enantiomers with identical physicochemical properties, the estimated RD50 values are the same. In addition, although alpha- and beta-pinene do not have identical Po and Loil values, their estimated potencies are quite close. However, the experimental results showed that D-enantiomers of pinenes were the most potent as sensory irritants and a difference in potency also exists between alpha- and beta-pinene. RD50 for D-enantiomers of alpha- and beta-pinene were almost equal, 1053 ppm and 1279 ppm in OF1 strain and 1107 ppm and 1419 ppm in NIH/S strain, respectively. Values differed by a factor of approximately 4 to 5 from L-beta-pinene for which the RD50 was 4663 ppm in OF1 and 5811 ppm in NIH/S mice. RD50 could not be determined for L-alpha-pinene; this pinene was almost inactive. D-alpha-pinene seems to best fit the receptor because its experimental RD50 was one-half of the estimated value while for D-beta-pinene those values were equal. On the contrary, L-beta-pinene was about 3 to 4 times less potent than estimated. L-alpha-pinene was only slightly active although it was estimated to be as potent as D-alpha-pinene. The remarkable difference in potency between L-enantiometers is most likely due to a structural difference between alpha- and beta-pinene: the more flexible beta-pinene can bend to fit into the receptor better than the rigid alpha-pinene. The results showed that the commonly used physicochemical descriptors cannot fully explain the potency of these chemicals; their three-dimensional structure should also be considered. Because of the stereospecificity of pinenes, a target site for nonreactive sensory irritants is most likely a receptor protein containing a chiral lipophilic pocket.


Subject(s)
Irritants/toxicity , Monoterpenes , Receptors, Drug/chemistry , Terpenes/toxicity , Animals , Bicyclic Monoterpenes , Lung/metabolism , Lung/pathology , Lung Diseases/chemically induced , Lung Diseases/pathology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred Strains , Models, Molecular , Receptors, Drug/drug effects , Respiratory Mechanics/drug effects , Sensory Receptor Cells/drug effects , Stereoisomerism , Terpenes/chemistry , Thermodynamics , Time Factors
10.
Arch Toxicol ; 72(5): 277-82, 1998 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9630013

ABSTRACT

We expanded a previously described rule-based computerized method to recognize the sensory irritating effect of airborne chemicals. Using 2-chlorobenzylchloride (CBC) as a sensory irritant, characteristic modifications of the normal breathing pattern of exposed mice were evaluated by measuring the duration of braking (TB) after inspiration and the resulting decrease in breathing frequency. From the measurement of TB, each breath was then classified as normal (N) or sensory irritation (S). Using increasing exposure concentrations, the classification S increased from < or = 2% (equivalent to sham-exposure) to 100% within a narrow exposure concentration range. The potency of CBC was then evaluated by calculating the concentration necessary to produce 50% of the breaths classified as S, i.e., S50. This approach is easier to use than obtaining RD50 (decrease in respiratory frequency by 50%) when high exposure concentrations are difficult to achieve. Detection limits were also established for this bioassay and experiments were conducted to obtain a level of response just around these limits, in order to delineate the practicality of using this bioassay at low exposure concentrations. Using this approach, sensory irritation was the only effect induced by CBC at low exposure concentrations. However, bronchoconstriction and pulmonary irritation were superimposed on this effect at higher exposure concentrations.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Benzyl Compounds/adverse effects , Irritants/adverse effects , Respiratory Mechanics/drug effects , Software , Air Pollutants/analysis , Animals , Benzyl Compounds/analysis , Biological Assay , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Irritants/analysis , Linear Models , Male , Mice
11.
Arch Toxicol ; 72(3): 125-40, 1998 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9520136

ABSTRACT

We used a database of 145 volatile organic chemicals for which the sensory irritation potency (RD50) has been reported in mice. Chemicals were first separated into two groups: nonreactive and reactive, using Ferguson's rule. This rule suggests that nonreactive chemicals induce their effect via a physical (p) mechanism (i.e., weak forces or interactions between a chemical and a biological receptor). Therefore, appropriate physicochemical descriptors can be used to estimate their potency. For reactives, a chemical (c) mechanism (i.e., covalent bonding with the receptor) would explain their potency. All chemicals were also separated on the basis of functional groups and subgroups into 24 classifications. Our results indicated that the potency of nonreactive chemicals, regardless of their chemical structure, can be estimated using a variety of physicochemical descriptors. For reactive chemicals, we identified five basic reactivity mechanisms which explained why their potency was higher than that estimated from physicochemical descriptors. We concluded that Ferguson's proposed rule is adequate initially to classify two separate mechanisms of receptor interactions, p vs c. Several physicochemical descriptors can be used to estimate the potency of p chemicals, but chemical reactivity descriptors are needed to estimate the potency for c chemicals. At present, this is the largest database for nonreactive-reactive chemicals in toxicology. Because of the wide variety of c chemicals presented, a semi-quantitative estimate of the potency of new, or not previously evaluated, c chemicals can be arrived at via comparison with those presented and the basic chemical reactivity mechanisms presented.


Subject(s)
Hazardous Substances/toxicity , Irritants/toxicity , Acetates/toxicity , Alcohols/toxicity , Aldehydes/toxicity , Amines/toxicity , Animals , Databases, Factual , Gases/toxicity , Irritants/chemistry , Irritants/classification , Ketones/toxicity , Mice , Structure-Activity Relationship , Volatilization
12.
J Toxicol Environ Health ; 50(3): 217-63, 1997 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9055874

ABSTRACT

In recent years, several regulatory agencies and professional societies have recommended an occupational exposure limit (OEL) for formaldehyde. This article presents the findings of a panel of experts, the Industrial Health Foundation panel, who were charged to identify an OEL that would prevent irritation. To accomplish this task, they critiqued approximately 150 scientific articles. Unlike many other chemicals, a large amount of data is available upon which to base a concentration-response relationship for human irritation. A mathematical model developed by Kane et al. (1979) for predicting safe levels of exposure to irritants based on animal data was also evaluated. The panel concluded that for most persons, eye irritation clearly due to formaldehyde does not occur until at least 1.0 ppm. Information from controlled studies involving volunteers indicated that moderate to severe eye, nose, and throat irritation does not occur for most persons until airborne concentrations exceed 2.0-3.0 ppm. The data indicated that below 1.0 ppm, if irritation occurs in some persons, the effects rapidly subside due to "accommodation." Based on the weight of evidence from published studies, the panel found that persons exposed to 0.3 ppm for 4-6 h in chamber studies generally reported eye irritation at a rate no different than that observed when persons were exposed to clean air. It was noted that at a concentration of 0.5 ppm (8-h TWA) eye irritation was not observed in the majority of workers (about 80%). Consequently, the panel recommended an OEL of 0.3 ppm as an 8-h time-weighted average (TWA) with a ceiling value (CV) of 1.0 ppm (a concentration not to be exceeded) to avoid irritation. The panel believes that the ACGIH TLV of 0.3 ppm as a ceiling value was unnecessarily restrictive and that this value may have been based on the TLV Committee's interpretation of the significance of studies involving self-reported responses at concentrations less than 0.5 ppm. The panel concluded that any occupational or environmental guideline for formaldehyde should be based primarily on controlled studies in humans, since nearly all other studies are compromised by the presence of other contaminants. The panel also concluded that if concentrations of formaldehyde are kept below 0.1 ppm in the indoor environment (where exposures might occur 24 h/d) this should prevent irritation in virtually all persons. The panel could not identify a group of persons who were hypersensitive, nor was there evidence that anyone could be sensitized (develop an allergy) following inhalation exposure to formaldehyde. The panel concluded that there was sufficient evidence to show that persons with asthma respond no differently than healthy individuals following exposure to concentrations up to 3.0 ppm. Although cancer risk was not a topic that received exhaustive evaluation, the panel agreed with other scientific groups who have concluded that the cancer risk of formaldehyde is negligible at airborne concentrations that do not produce chronic irritation.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Irritant/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Formaldehyde , Occupational Exposure , Animals , Humans , Maximum Allowable Concentration
13.
Arch Toxicol ; 70(9): 567-78, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8831907

ABSTRACT

We have attempted to define a just detectable effect (JDE) for three different types of reactions along the respiratory tract: (a) sensory irritation of the upper airways (S), (b) airflow limitation along the conducting airways (A), and (c) pulmonary irritation at the alveolar level (P1 or P). Each type of reaction, S, A, P1 or P, was recognized by analyzing the breathing pattern of unanesthetized mice held in body plethysmographs. A rule-based computer program analyzed each breath during a period of 3.75 h and classified each breath as normal (N) or falling in any of the above categories (i.e., S, A, P1 or P). Eight groups of four mice were used for sham exposures: exposed to water vapor. These data sets were used, as sham exposure data, to define the variation which can occur with time in order to define an expected range of normal variation. Once this range was established, we defined JDE values for each type of effect and used such values to evaluate the results obtained in exposed animals. Eight groups of four mice were exposed to a mixture of airborne chemicals, machining fluid G (MFG), at concentrations from 0.17 to 55 mg/m3. Data sets for individual animals and for each group of animals exposed to MFG were analyzed to determine if and when a particular effect occurred. It was possible to recognize the effects of low exposure concentrations on groups of exposed animals or individual animals within each group. This procedure will be valuable when investigating the effect of airborne chemicals and when it is impossible to generate high exposure concentrations to define concentration-response relationships.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/toxicity , Respiratory System/drug effects , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Male , Mice , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Oils/toxicity
14.
Arch Toxicol ; 70(6): 319-28, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8975630

ABSTRACT

Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) have suggested the importance of hydrogen bonding in relation to activation of the sensory irritant receptor by nonreactive volatile organic chemicals. To investigate this possibility further, three model compounds with different hydrogen bond acidity, trifluoroethanol, hexafluoroisopropanol and methyl hexafluoroisopropyl ether, were selected for study. The potency of each chemical is obtained from the concentration necessary to reduce respiratory rate in mice by 50% (RD50). The RD50 values obtained were: methyl hexafluoroisopropyl ether (> or = 160,000 ppm), trifluoroethanol (11,400-23,300 ppm), and hexafluoroisopropanol (165 ppm). QSAR showed that trifluoroethanol and methyl hexafluoroisopropyl ether behaved as predicted as nonreactive sensory irritants, whereas hexafluoroisopropanol was much more potent than predicted. The higher than predicted potency of hexafluoroisopropanol could be due to a coupled reaction, involving both strong hydrogen bonding and weak Brönsted acidity. A concerted reaction could thus be more efficient in activation of the receptor. Hydrogen bonding properties and concerted reactions may be important in the activation of the sensory irritant receptor by nonreactive volatile organic chemicals.


Subject(s)
Irritants/toxicity , Methyl Ethers/toxicity , Propanols , Trifluoroethanol/toxicity , 1-Propanol/toxicity , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred Strains , Models, Chemical , Respiration/drug effects
15.
SAR QSAR Environ Res ; 5(3): 151-65, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9114512

ABSTRACT

This article describes the possibility of estimating whether or not a mixture of nonreactive volatile organic chemicals (NRVOC) is likely to elicit complaints of sensory irritation in humans. For this estimation we rely on: a) the sensory irritating potency of individual NRVOC can be estimated from a variety of physicochemical properties of these chemicals, b) at low exposure concentrations, the additivity rule can be applied using the potency of each chemical in a mixture and c) a threshold concentration exists below which no sensory irritation will occur. We used this estimating approach and we compared the results obtained with those obtained experimentally in humans exposed to a well defined mixture. The approach presented can be used to arrive at a decision as to whether or not exposure to a mixture of NRVOC is likely to result in sensory irritation complaints by humans, either in the general indoor air situation or for industrial workers.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , Irritants/adverse effects , Animals , Environmental Exposure , Humans , Hydrocarbons/adverse effects , Hydrocarbons/chemistry , Hydrocarbons/pharmacokinetics , Hydrogen Bonding , Irritants/chemistry , Irritants/pharmacokinetics , Lethal Dose 50 , Mice , Regression Analysis , Skin Absorption/drug effects , Skin Absorption/physiology , Structure-Activity Relationship , Volatilization
16.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol ; 134(1): 92-9, 1995 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7676461

ABSTRACT

This article presents the correlations obtained between the results on the potency of nonreactive airborne chemicals as sensory irritants and several of their physicochemical properties. The potency of airborne sensory irritants obtained from a reflexively induced decrease in respiratory frequency has been measured in the past using mice. Typically, their potency has been expressed as the exposure concentration necessary to decrease respiratory frequency by 50% (RD50). A large database of RD50 values is now available and such values are highly correlated with occupational exposure guidelines such as threshold limit values (TLVs). We used the nonreactive volatile organic chemicals from this database, for which relevant physicochemical variables are available or can be calculated. These variables were vapor pressure (P) or Ostwald gas-liquid partition coefficients (L). The liquids used for L values were n-hexadecane, octanol, N-formylmorpholine, tri-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphate, and olive oil. Excellent correlations were found between log RD50 and log P, as well as between log RD50 and log L16, log L(Oct), log L(NFM), log L(EHP), or log L(Oil). It follows that as an alternative to the bioassay, these physicochemical variables can be used to estimate RD50 of nonreactive volatile organic chemicals. Appropriate exceptions to general estimation of RD50 values from physicochemical variables are also presented, as well as the most appropriate estimates which can be obtained within homologous series.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/toxicity , Animal Testing Alternatives , Hydrocarbons/chemistry , Hydrocarbons/toxicity , Respiration/drug effects , Animals , Databases, Factual , Lethal Dose 50 , Male , Mice , Physical Phenomena , Physics , Regression Analysis , Species Specificity
17.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 21(3): 165-78, 1995 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7481604

ABSTRACT

This review outlines the effects of pollutants on the lungs. Mechanisms and effects relevant to the assessment of indoor-air risk are especially dealt with. Important mediators have also been considered. Concentration-effect relationships exist for toxic reactions, sensitization reactions, and neurogenic effects. If Harber's Law is used for extrapolations from higher concentrations to the lower indoor-air levels, the indoor-air risk estimate may exceed the real risk. Additivity seems to apply to toxic and neurogenic effects of low doses. Only already sensitized subjects and possible subjects with a profound alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency appear to be extremely sensitive, and a safety factor of 10 seems adequate for the protection of other groups. Thus combining occupational exposure limits (OEL), Harber's Law, and the safety factor suggests that no direct lung effects should be expected from a substance if the exposure level does not exceed 1/40.OEL.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced , Adult , Aged , Animals , Asthma/chemically induced , Asthma/immunology , Child , Female , Humans , Lung/drug effects , Lung/innervation , Lung/physiopathology , Macrophage Activation , Macrophages, Alveolar/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Tract Diseases/immunology , Respiratory Tract Diseases/physiopathology , Risk Assessment
18.
Arch Toxicol ; 69(9): 579-89, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8660134

ABSTRACT

We expanded a previously published (Vijayaraghavan et al. 1994) computerized system to analyze the breathing pattern of unanesthetized mice in order better to recognize and quantify the effects of an airborne mixture of chemicals at three different levels of the respiratory tract. The airborne chemical mixture used was a machining fluid. Such fluids are widely used in industry and a large number of workers are exposed to these airborne mixtures. We found this mixture to be capable of inducing three types of effects on the respiratory tract: sensory irritation of the upper respiratory tract (S), airflow limitation along the conducting airways (A) and pulmonary irritation (P). Depending upon the exposure concentration, mainly S or P effects were obtained but an A effect was also identified. The three types of effects occurred at various times during the exposures and, furthermore, within a group of exposed animals some exhibited one type of effect while others exhibited another type. In order to analyze such complex data sets, two statistical methods for smoothing polynomial splines were utilized: the maximum likelihood (ML) method and generalized cross validation (GCV) method. The results indicated the previous methods used to characterize a single effect of airborne chemicals can now be extended to evaluate mixtures likely to induce multiple types of effects. However, statistical analysis methods, either the ML or GCV methods, or other appropriate methods are needed to evaluate the responses obtained due to the complex effects that a mixture can induce in comparison to single chemicals.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/toxicity , Respiratory Function Tests/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory System/drug effects , Software , Aerosols , Air Pollutants/analysis , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Male , Mice , Respiratory Function Tests/methods
19.
J Pharm Sci ; 83(5): 680-8, 1994 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8071821

ABSTRACT

The Ferguson principle, that Pnar/PO (Pnar is the partial pressure of a series of compounds giving rise to a particular effect on a given system by a physical mechanism, and PO is the saturated vapor pressure of the liquid narcotic) is constant for a series of nonreactive narcotics or toxicants in a given system, is examined and shown to have no thermodynamic basis, contrary to the position of Brink and Posternak. Conditions under which Pnar/PO might be expected to be roughly constant, as an empirical observation, are set out and it is shown that such an observation is consistent with a receptor area in which the liquid narcotic solubilities are roughly constant. An interpretation of relationships between agonist descriptors and biological effects is carried out with three simple biological models. It is shown that the biological potency of nonreactive gases and vapors can be controlled either by an equilibrium between the agonist in the gas phase and the agonist in a receptor or by an equilibrium between the agonist in the gas phase and the agonist in a receptor phase. It is further shown that with the solvation equation of Abraham, solvents can be chosen that mimic the chemical properties of the receptor or receptor phase. For the example of upper respiratory tract irritation of male Swiss OF1 mice, such solvents include N-formylmorpholine, a trialkylphosphate, and wet octanol, but not water itself.


Subject(s)
Chemistry, Physical/methods , Gases/chemistry , Gases/toxicity , Inert Gas Narcosis/etiology , Kinetics , Mathematical Computing , Partial Pressure , Solubility , Solutions , Thermodynamics
20.
Arch Toxicol ; 68(7): 434-43, 1994.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7979960

ABSTRACT

Inhalation exposure to toluene diisocyanate (TDI) can result in a variety of airway diseases. Concern has been expressed that a putative carcinogenic potential of TDI exists as a result of the formation of toluenediamine (TDA) by hydrolysis of the isocyanate in the body. Results from long-term bioassays (TDI inhalation versus gavage in rats and mice) are contradictory and discrepancies do exist concerning the interpretation of adverse effects. This study was performed to analyze the distribution and reactivity of radioactively-labeled TDI using vapor exposure in a rat model system. Rats were exposed to 14C-TDI vapors at concentrations ranging from 0.026 to 0.821 ppm for 4 h. All tissues examined showed detectable quantities of radioactivity, with the airways, gastrointestinal system and blood having the highest levels which increased with exposure concentration. The concentration of radioactivity in the bloodstream after exposure was linear with respect to dose. The majority (74-87%) of the label associated with the blood was recovered in the plasma, and of this, 97-100% of the 14C existed in the form of biomolecular conjugates. Analysis of stomach contents shows that the majority of the label is also associated with high (> 10 kDa) molecular weight species. While a larger percentage (28%) of the label is found in the low molecular weight fraction relative to blood, this low molecular weight labeled material represents at least eight different components. Thus, over the vapor exposure concentrations and time tested, it appears that conjugation is the predominant reaction and that free TDA is not a primary in vivo reaction product under the conditions tested.


Subject(s)
Toluene 2,4-Diisocyanate/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Inhalation , Animals , Carbon Radioisotopes , Chromatography, Affinity , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Gastrointestinal Contents/chemistry , Male , Molecular Weight , Rats , Rats, Inbred F344 , Tissue Distribution , Toluene 2,4-Diisocyanate/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...