Methods of Hemostasis in Cranial Neurosurgery: An Anatomy-Based Stepwise Review.

BACKGROUND: Hemostasis is crucial in preventing hemorrhage during cranial neurosurgical procedures and maintaining visualization of the surgical field. There is significant variation in the availability of hemostatic methods across different settings and hemostatic techniques are being continuously developed over the decades of practicing neurosurgery. The aim of this article is to provide an outline of the potential methods to achieve hemostasis based on the sequential operative anatomy of a cranial operation. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed database was searched from inception of the database to July 18, 2023. A total of 64 studies were identified fulfilling predefined inclusion criteria, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. RESULTS: Seventy-one hemostatic agents, techniques, tools, and devices were identified, which were then categorized according to the operative phase for which they are indicated. Nine operative anatomic targets were addressed in the sequence in which they are involved during a cranial procedure. For each anatomic target, the following number of hemostatic techniques/agents were identified: 11 for scalp, 3 for periosteum, 10 for skull bone, 11 for dura mater, 9 for venous sinuses, 5 for arteries, 6 for veins, 12 for brain parenchyma, and 4 for cerebral ventricles. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the phase of the surgery and the anatomic structure involved, the selection of the appropriate hemostatic method is determined by the source of bleeding. Surgeon awareness of all the potential techniques that can be applied to achieve hemostasis is paramount, especially when faced with operative nuances and difficult-to-control bleeding during cranial neurosurgical procedures.

Regional and seasonal variations in functional abdominal pain and functional constipation prevalence among Saudi children.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate functional abdominal pain disorders and functional constipation prevalence in the central region of Saudi Arabia, and compare it to that of the western region. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using online questionnaires targeting the general population of Riyadh region of Saudi Arabia. Subjects were randomly selected by sharing links on social media groups. Any parent with a 3-18-year-old child was included, and children with chronic medical illnesses or symptoms of organic GI disorders were excluded. Results: Three hundred nineteen subjects were included in the final analysis; the prevalence of functional abdominal pain disorders overall was 6.2% and the prevalence of functional constipation was 8.1%. Conclusions: Functional constipation diagnosis seems to be affected by life stressors or a previous viral illness. Seasonal variations had minimal effect on functional abdominal pain disorder and functional constipation symptom frequency and severity.

Outcome measures in neurosurgery: Is a unified approach better? A literature review.

Background: Accurate assessment and evaluation of health interventions are crucial to evidence-based care. The use of outcome measures in neurosurgery grew with the introduction of the Glasgow Coma Scale. Since then, various outcome measures have appeared, some of which are disease-specific and others more generally. This article aims to address the most widely used outcome measures in three major neurosurgery subspecialties, "vascular, traumatic, and oncologic," focusing on the potential, advantages, and drawbacks of a unified approach to these outcome measures. Methods: A literature review search was conducted by using PubMed MEDLINE and Google scholar Databases. Data for the three most common outcome measures, The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), were extracted and analyzed. Results: The original objective of establishing a standardized, common language for the accurate categorization, quantification, and evaluation of patients' outcomes has been eroded. The KPS, in particular, may provide a common ground for initiating a unified approach to outcome measures. With clinical testing and modification, it may offer a simple, internationally standardized approach to outcome measures in neurosurgery and elsewhere. Based on our analysis, Karnofsky's Performance Scale may provide a basis of reaching a unified global outcome measure. Conclusion: Outcome measures in neurosurgery, including mRS, GOS, and KPS, are widely utilized assessment tools for patients' outcomes in various neurosurgical specialties. A unified global measure may offer solutions with ease of use and application; however, there are limitations.