Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 291: 61-69, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37832480

ABSTRACT

AIM: To conduct the first-ever systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the antihemorrhagic utility and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) versus misoprostol for management (prevention and/or treatment) of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). METHODS: Six databases were screened from inception until May 2023 and updated in September 2023. The RCTs were assessed for quality according to the Cochrane's risk of bias tool. The endpoints were summarized as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model. RESULTS: Ten RCTs with 2121 patients (TXA = 1061 and misoprostol = 1060) were analyzed. There was no significant difference between TXA and misoprostol groups regarding the mean intraoperative blood loss (n = 9 RCTs, MD = 17.32 ml, 95% CI [-40.43, 75.07], p = 0.56), mean change in hemoglobin (n = 6 RCTs, MD = 0.11 mg/dl, 95% CI [-0.1, 0.31], p = 0.30), mean hospital stay (n = 2 RCTs, MD = -0.3 day, 95% CI [-0.61, 0.01], p = 0.06), blood transfusion rate (n = 4 RCTs, RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.16, 1.47], p = 0.2), and rate of additional uterotonic agents (n = 4 RCTs, RR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.72, 1.53], p = 0.81). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed robustness of the results, and there was no evidence of publication bias. Regarding safety endpoints, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the rates of minor side effects, such as diarrhea, fever, nausea, and vomiting. No patient developed thromboembolic events in the TXA group. CONCLUSION: There was no significant antihemorrhagic efficacy between adjunct TXA and misoprostol for the management of PPH. The safety profile was comparable between both agents.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Hemostatics , Misoprostol , Postpartum Hemorrhage , Tranexamic Acid , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Misoprostol/adverse effects , Postpartum Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Postpartum Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects
2.
Clin Ther ; 45(10): e208-e216, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612170

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The results of meta-analyses regarding the effect of vitamin D on blood pressure are conflicting. The present umbrella meta-analysis was conducted to provide definite and conclusive results. METHODS: Systematically, Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases and Google Scholar were searched for relevant literature published up to July 2022. All meta-analyses of clinical trials addressing the effect of vitamin D on blood pressure were included. Random effects analysis was performed to obtain the overall effect size based on the standardized mean differences (SMDs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) separately. The quality of included meta-analyses was assessed by using the Measurement Tool for Assessing Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 questionnaire. FINDINGS: Overall, 21 meta-analyses were enrolled in the umbrella review. The results indicated that systolic blood pressure was significantly reduced after the intervention based on WMD effect size analysis (ESWMD = -0.69 mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.04 [P < 0.038]; I2 = 46.7%, P = 0.021); however, no considerable impact was observed based on analysis of SMD effect sizes (ESSMD = -0.05 mm Hg; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.14; P = 0.615). Also, vitamin D supplementation indicated a significant improvement in diastolic blood pressure based on WMD effect sizes (ESWMD = -0.66 mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.05 to -0.27 [P < 0.001]; I2 = 56.4%, P = 0.004) but not SMD analysis (ESSMD = -0.04 mm Hg; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.04 [P = 0.328]; I2 = 53.4%, P = 0.057). IMPLICATIONS: Based on obtained evidence, vitamin D could be considered an efficient adjuvant for improving blood pressure.


Subject(s)
Vitamin D , Vitamins , Humans , Blood Pressure , Vitamin D/pharmacology , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements
3.
Pharmacol Res ; 187: 106605, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36509315

ABSTRACT

Meta-analyses of interventional and observational studies investigating the efficacy and the relationship between vitamin D and depression provided inconsistent results. The current umbrella meta-analysis was conducted to assess the available evidence and provide a conclusive outcome in this regard. The following international databases were systematically searched till March 2022: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Random-effects model was carried out to calculate the pooled point estimates and their respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Ten meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) revealed significant reduction in depression symptoms comparing participants on vitmain D supplements to those on placebo (Pooled standardised mean difference: - 0.40; 95 % CI: - 0.60, - 0.21, p < 0.01: I2 = 89.1 %, p < 0.01). Four meta-analyses of cohort studies (with one having two subgroups) revealed that participants with lower levels of serum vitamin D were at increased odds of depression than those with higher levels of serum vitamin D (Pooled odds ratio: 1.60; 95 % CI: 1.08, 2.36, p < 0.01; I2 = 91.3 %, p < 0.01). The present umbrella meta-analysis confirms the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation and higher serum vitamin D levels in reducing the development and symptoms of depression.


Subject(s)
Vitamin D Deficiency , Vitamin D , Humans , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/prevention & control , Vitamins/therapeutic use , Dietary Supplements , Vitamin D Deficiency/drug therapy
4.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 276: 38-46, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35803111

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) in promoting cervical ripening during labour induction. METHODS: Six major databases were searched from inception until 22 April 2021. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Various endpoints (n = 21) were meta-analysed, and the endpoints were pooled as mean differences (MD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: In total, 23 RCTs were included in this review, comprising 26 intervention arms and a total of 4305 patients (2210 and 2095 patients were allocated to the IMN and control groups, respectively). Pertaining to obstetric-related maternal outcomes, the pooled analysis showed that admission to delivery time and rate of caesarean delivery were significantly reduced in the IMN group. Moreover, the mean Bishop score and the mean change in Bishop score were significantly increased in the IMN group. Pertaining to drug-related maternal side effect outcomes, the pooled analysis showed that the rates of headache, palpitations, nausea and flushing were significantly lower in the IMN group. Pertaining to neonatal outcomes, the pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal death, fetal distress, meconium-stained water, Apgar score < 7 at 1 and 5 min, and mean Apgar score at 1 and 5 min. CONCLUSION: IMN correlated with several obstetric-related maternal outcomes. IMN was not associated with adverse neonatal outcomes, but was associated with substantial drug-related maternal side effects.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Oxytocics , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Isosorbide Dinitrate/analogs & derivatives , Labor, Induced/adverse effects , Oxytocics/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
5.
Gulf J Oncolog ; 1(38): 86-89, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35156650

ABSTRACT

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are infrequent mesenchymal neoplasms. Primary uterine PEComas are extremely uncommon. To the best of knowledge, around 110 cases of uterine PEComas have been documented in the English-language literature thus far. Herein, we present the case of primary uterine PEComa in a 56-year-old Saudi woman who presented to clinical attention with a six-month history of left-sided abdominal pain. Gynecological examination showed a 5-cm solid mass involving the left adnexa. Tumor markers were normal. Computed tomography scan demonstrated a 4.2 x 4.4 x 3.4 cm superior left fundal exophytic mass. Patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Final histopathological examination demonstrated benign/uncertain malignant potential PEComa. No further adjuvant therapy was administered. At six-month follow up, the patient was asymptomatic without recurrence. In conclusion, uterine PEComas are rare. Histopathological assessment establishes the definitive diagnosis. Surgery remains the gold standard in the treatment of uterine PEComas and adjuvant therapy should be guided based on clinical and histopathological risk factors. Keywords: Uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumor; PEComa; Uterine sarcoma; hysterectomy.


Subject(s)
Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms , Uterine Neoplasms , Biomarkers, Tumor , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Middle Aged , Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Uterine Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...