Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Environ Res ; 83(3): 311-21, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10944075

ABSTRACT

In a program coordinated by the Italian Ministry of Works, we tested in vitro four pesticides widely employed in a developed agricultural region of central Italy. The four commercial agents were chosen on the basis of their diffusion in agricultural practice, knowledge of their active principle(s), and scant availability of data concerning their toxic and genotoxic activity. The agents were Cirtoxin, Decis, Tramat Combi (TC), and Lasso Micromix (LM). All substances were tested in three in vitro systems: Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, a metabolically competent hamster cell line (Chinese hamster epithelial liver; CHEL), and root tips of Vicia faba (VF). The cytotoxic and genotoxic end points challenged were micronuclei and root tip length (RTL) in VF and mitotic index (MI), proliferation index (PI), cell survival (CS), cell growth (CG), cell cycle length (CCL), sister chromatid exchanges, chromosomal aberrations, and single-cell gel electrophoresis, or comet assay, in CHEL and CHO cells. Tested doses ranged from the field dose up to 200x the field dose to take into account accumulation effects. On the whole, tested agents appear to induce genotoxic damage only at subtoxic or toxic doses, indicating a low clastogenic risk. MI, PI, CS, CG, RTL, and CCL appear to be the less sensitive end points, showing no effects in the presence of a clear positive response in some or all of the other tests. Using cytogenetic tests, we obtained positive results for TC and LM treatments in CHO but not in CHEL cells. These data could be accounted for by postulating a detoxifying activity exerted by this cell line. However, cytogenetic end points appear to be more sensitive than those referring to cytotoxicity.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle/drug effects , Pesticides/toxicity , Agriculture , Animals , CHO Cells , Cell Line , Cell Survival , Comet Assay , Cricetinae , DNA Damage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Liver/cytology , Liver/drug effects , Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective , Mitotic Index , Mutagenicity Tests , Plant Roots/drug effects , Sister Chromatid Exchange
2.
Mutat Res ; 429(2): 239-48, 1999 Oct 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10526208

ABSTRACT

Among other targets, DNA demethylating agents are known to affect the sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequency in mammalian cells in vitro. The SCE increase appears to be maintained for many (10-16) cell cycles after the end of the pulse in a given cell population, unlike SCEs induced by DNA damaging agents. Yet, epigenetic changes (such as demethylation) would not be expected to affect SCE at all. In the present report we challenge the working hypothesis of a relation between SCEs and demethylation by comparing SCE induction during different rounds of replication when the parental strands were normally methylated or demethylated. Azacytidine (AZA), ethionine (ETH), mitomycin-C (MMC), UV-irradiation (UV) and hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) were tested for SCE induction in a Chinese hamster ovary cell line after a single pulse, one or two cell cycles before fixation. Whereas MMC, UV and H(2)O(2) induce SCE in both protocols, AZA and ETH show an effect on SCEs only if administered two cycles before fixation. Because two cell cycles are needed in order to achieve demethylation of the parental DNA strand, the data reported here support our working hypothesis that demethylation in the parental DNA strand, at the level of the replication fork (i.e., the region where SCEs are formed), is responsible for an increase in mistaken ligations of processed damage, eventually yielding an increase in SCEs.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage/genetics , DNA Methylation , Mutagens/pharmacology , Sister Chromatid Exchange/genetics , Animals , Azacitidine/pharmacology , Bromodeoxyuridine , CHO Cells , Cell Cycle , Cricetinae , Ethionine/pharmacology , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , Mitomycin/pharmacology , Ultraviolet Rays
3.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 49(3): 125-32, 1997 Sep.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9432734

ABSTRACT

Among the various dermatologic abnormalities that can be associated with advanced chronic renal failure and dialysis therapy, pruritus is certainly the most disturbing disorder. Pruritus is an unpleasant, vexing sensation that provokes an intense desire to scratch. In the past the pruritus was considered from the neurophysiologic point of view as a submodality of pain, but more recent research showed that pain and pruritus are sensations which are carried through different populations of primary sensory neurons. The causes of pruritus in uremic patients are still unknown: xerosis, intradermic microprecipitation of divalent ions, hyperparathyroidism, peripheral neuropathy, allergic reactions and hypersensitivity, histamine and others have been considered as pathogenetic factors. The uncertainty on the causes is in part responsible for the different approach and results, unsatisfactory in many cases. In this paper we will review the neurophysiology, the pathogenesis and the possible therapeutic approaches to uremic pruritus.


Subject(s)
Pruritus/etiology , Uremia/complications , Cations/metabolism , Diagnosis, Differential , Histamine Release , Humans , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/etiology , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Ichthyosis/etiology , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Prevalence , Pruritus/diagnosis , Pruritus/epidemiology , Pruritus/physiopathology , Pruritus/therapy , Vitamin A/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...