ABSTRACT
Background: The concept of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders began when medical and surgical interventions increased the possibility of resuscitation in dying patients. Healthcare providers should start to care more about the quality of life rather than quantity. The acceptance of signing DNR orders varies among physicians owing to different reasons and conceptions. Objective: The aim of this national survey was to evaluate the extent of physicians' knowledge and attitude towards do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in different hospitals and specialties in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia and other Arab Gulf countries between March 2019 and May 2021. Results: A total of 409 physicians completed the questionnaire (53.3% male, 47% of the participants were less than 30 years of age). Most participants had their residency medical training in Saudi Arabia (73.6%, n=281); 33.5% were emergency medicine (EM) physicians. Among 409 patients, 92.7% (n=379 ) were familiar with the DNR (do-not-resuscitate) ter. Half of the participants had never discussed a DNR status with the patient or family (n=215, 52.6%), however, only 38.4% had read the policy. A total of 275 (67.2%) participants were aware that their institute had a DNR policy, and a lack of patient/family understanding was the most common barrier for the majority to initiate DNR orders (53.9%, n=222). Most of the participants (65.8%, n=269) acknowledged a lack of training and understanding of the concepts of DNR orders. Conclusion: Most physicians who participated in this study were aware of the DNR order concept; however, half of them had never discussed or signed a DNR order. Patients and their families' misunderstandings were considered the main barriers. In addition, the lack of training in the concepts of DNR orders was considered a major obstacle.
Subject(s)
Physicians , Resuscitation Orders , Humans , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Quality of Life , PerceptionABSTRACT
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection is a major complication and the main cause of shunt failure, contributing to a high rate of morbidity and mortality among patients requiring prolonged hospitalization. Shunt infection-related complications are considered a global burden of hydrocephalus worldwide. In our hospital, King Fahad Hospital of the University, the rate of infections in similar cases reached 8% during the period from 1999 to 2001; an increase in this rate was observed in the past two years. This study analyzed the infections that occur after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in patients with hydrocephalus and related conditions during the period from January 2012 to April 2017. The objectives of this study were to analyze the rate of cerebrospinal fluid infections in different age groups at the King Fahd Hospital of the University and to identify the causative pathogens and methods of reducing the rate and consequences of such infections. In this retrospective study, the electronic medical records of 266 patients were reviewed and those of 131 patients were included and analyzed. We found that the prevalence rate of shunt-related infections was 24.4%, which indicates the importance of this problem. Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most commonly implicated microorganism. The most affected age groups were those of preschool children and infants. Individuals who were older than 74 years were the least affected. It was found that delayed infections were the most common type of VP shunt infection among the study population and there was no difference in the most common organisms between early, delayed, and late infections. The mean duration of antibiotic treatment used was 19.76 days. In conclusion, postoperative infections are significantly common in patients who undergo shunt-related surgeries.
ABSTRACT
Thyroid storm is a rare and a life-threatening condition, and serious complications could happen if not diagnosed and managed early. The typical clinical manifestations of hyperthyroidism are exaggerated in thyroid storm, particularly marked pyrexia and tachycardia, and altered mental status as agitation, delirium, or coma. Many precipitating factors contribute to the presentation of thyroid storm, and new recent factors like Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) could play a significant role. Serious and rare complications from the thyroid storm can increase the risk of mortality and morbidity up to 30% as fulminant hepatic failure, which is reported only a handful of times in the literature. Also, congestive heart failure can be part of the multiorgan dysfunction from the presentation, if associated with the thyroid storm. In this report, we present a case of thyroid storm precipitated by EBV and causing fast atrial fibrillation complicated by congestive heart failure and fulminant hepatic failure for 46-year-old Bangladeshi male not known to have any medical illness. He presented to the emergency department with 10-day history of an on and off subjective fever, associated with generalized abdominal pain and vomiting. He developed palpitation at the day of presentation. He was managed, stabilized, intubated, and shifted to the ICU as the patient started to be apneic after the conscious sedation for the cardioversion. During the admission anti-EBV viral capsid antigen IgM antibody was positive. The patient was discharged after five days in ICU and 14 days of overall hospital stay. Although the complication of thyroid storm as fulminant hepatic failure and congestive heart failure are rare, they should be considered in cases with thyroid storm. The pre-existing of EBV as a precipitating factor should always be considered, and more studies in these regards need to be done.
