ABSTRACT
The use of unlicensed and "off-label" medicines in children is widespread. Between 50-80% of the medicines currently administered to children have neither been tested nor authorized for their use in the paediatric population which represents approximately 25% of the whole European population. On 26 January 2007, entered into force the European Regulation of Paediatric Medicines. It aims at the quality of research into medicines for children but without subjecting the paediatric population to unnecessary clinical trial. This article addresses ethical and legal issues arising from the regulation and makes recommendations for the framework conditions facilitating the development of clinical research with children.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/ethics , Biomedical Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics , Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Pediatrics/ethics , Pediatrics/legislation & jurisprudence , Child , Europe , HumansSubject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/etiology , Bone Marrow Examination , Humans , Infections/etiology , Infections/therapy , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/diagnosis , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/genetics , Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic/therapy , PrognosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In 1999, the Italian Society of Rheumatology started a project to determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of aggressive rheumatoid arthritis (ARA). METHODS: For 1 year, all patients with RA for > 5 years and referred to participating centers were entered in a registry and classified as having ARA if they fulfilled the following criteria: 10 swollen joints for at least 6 weeks, positive rheumatoid factor (RF), and at least one bone erosion (if disease duration of 2 years); (a) RF-positive and having 10 swollen joints or at least one newly eroded joint, or (b) if RF-negative, having 10 swollen joints and at least one newly eroded joint (if disease duration > 2 to < 5 years). RESULTS: The 94 participating centers enrolled 1218 patients with RA, 1130 of whom had enough data to be classified as ARA (29.0%) or non-ARA (71.0%). The frequency of ARA was 15% in the 2-year group and 63% in the > 2 to < 5-year group, but 35% of the patients in the 2-year group had erosions. Bone erosions were associated with disease duration, a Health Assessment Questionnaire value > 1.5, female sex, and RF positivity. Conditions other than RA were recorded in about 50% of the patients, and only 30% 40% were taking disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. CONCLUSION: In an Italian RA population, the GIARA (Gruppo Italiano Artrite Reumatoide Aggressiva) criteria for ARA were met by 15% of the patients with disease duration of 2 years, but erosions were seen in 35%. Upon referral, most of the RA patients were inadequately treated and had other conditions.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Registries , Adult , Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
There is not agreement about the best maintenance treatment for patients with diffuse lupus nephritis. This multicenter, randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine and azathioprine. Seventy-five patients with diffuse proliferative lupus were given three intravenous methylprednisolone pulses followed by prednisone and oral cyclophosphamide for a median of 90 d. Subsequently, patients were randomly assigned either to cyclosporine or to azathioprine for 2 yr (core study). Treatment continued for up to 4 yr (follow-up study). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of disease flares. Secondary end points were proteinuria per day, creatinine clearance, and adverse effects. Seven flares occurred in the cyclosporine group, and eight occurred in the azathioprine group. At the end of the core study, mean proteinuria decreased from 2.8 +/- 3.57 to 0.4 +/- 0.85 g/d (P < 0.0001) in the cyclosporine group and from 2.2 +/- 1.94 to 0.5 +/- 0.78 g/d (P < 0.0002) in the azathioprine group. After 4 yr, mean proteinuria was 0.2 +/- 0.24 and 0.3 +/- 0.33 g/d, respectively. At the core study end and at the follow-up completion, creatinine clearance and BP levels did not change significantly from baseline in either group. Five of 36 patients who were receiving cyclosporine and four of the 33 who were receiving azathioprine stopped the treatment because of adverse effects. For patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis, azathioprine or cyclosporine combined with corticosteroids demonstrated equal efficacy in the prevention of flares.
