Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Tob Control ; 18(3): 245-8, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19168475

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adolescents living in parental homes where smoking is banned are more likely to move into smoke-free living quarters when they leave home. METHODS: We analysed data on 693 youths from a 4-year, three-wave prospective study of a representative sample of Massachusetts adolescents (aged 12-17). All youths resided in independent living quarters at follow-up. The primary outcome was presence of a smoking ban in the living quarters at follow-up. The primary predictor was presence of a household smoking ban in the parental home, assessed 2 years before the outcome. Generalised linear mixed effects models examined the effect of a parental household smoking ban on the odds of moving into smoke-free living quarters at follow-up overall and stratified by smoking status at follow-up. RESULTS: Youths leaving home had much higher odds of moving to smoke-free living quarters if their parental household had had a smoking ban (odds ratio (OR) = 12.70, 95% CI, 6.19 to 26.04). Other independent predictors included moving into a school or college residence (OR = 3.88, 95% CI 1.87 to 8.05), and not living with smokers at follow-up (OR = 3.91, 95% CI 1.93 to 7.92). CONCLUSIONS: A household smoking ban in the parental home appears to lead youths to prefer smoke-free living quarters once they leave home.


Subject(s)
Independent Living/psychology , Parenting/psychology , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Adolescent , Air Pollution, Indoor , Child , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Odds Ratio
2.
Tob Control ; 14(5): 300-6, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16183980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While smoke-free restaurant laws are intended to protect the public from secondhand smoke exposure, they may also discourage smoking among adolescents. There is no evidence from longitudinal studies to test this hypothesis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of local restaurant smoking regulations on progression to established smoking among adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: A cohort of 2623 Massachusetts youths, ages 12-17 years at baseline, was interviewed via random digit dial telephone survey in 2001-2002 and followed up two years later. A generalised estimating equations (GEE) logistic regression analysis was used and controlled for potential individual, household, and town level confounding factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Progression to established smoking during the two year follow up period (defined as having smoked 100 or more cigarettes in one's life). RESULTS: Compared to youths living in towns with weak regulations, those living in towns with strong regulations (complete restaurant smoking bans) had less than half the odds of progression to established smoking (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 0.66). The association was stronger for youths in towns with strong regulations in effect for two or more years (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.37), although it was still present for those in towns with strong regulations in effect for less than two years (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.90). No relationship was found between living in a town with a medium restaurant smoking regulation (restriction of smoking to enclosed, separately ventilated areas) and rates of progression to established smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Local restaurant smoking bans may be an effective intervention to prevent youth smoking.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior , Restaurants/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Air Pollution, Indoor/legislation & jurisprudence , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control
3.
Tob Control ; 13(4): 347-55, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15564617

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between strength of local restaurant smoking regulations and smoking related social norms among youths and adults. DESIGN: We used generalised estimating equations logistic regression analysis to examine the relation between regulation strength and youths' and adults' perceptions of adult smoking prevalence and the social acceptability of smoking in their town, while controlling for baseline anti-smoking sentiment in the town. SETTING: Each of the 351 Massachusetts towns were classified as having strong (complete smoking ban), medium (restriction of smoking to enclosed, separately ventilated areas), or weak (all others) restaurant smoking regulations. SUBJECTS: 1147 Massachusetts youths ages 12-17 years and 2116 adults who reported that they often or always eat out in their own town, drawn from a random digit dial survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceived adult smoking prevalence and perceived social acceptability of smoking in restaurants, in bars, or in general. RESULTS: Compared to youths from towns with weak regulations, youths from towns with strong regulations were more likely to perceive lower adult smoking prevalence (odds ratio (OR) 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 2.84) and social unacceptability of adult smoking (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.08) in their town. Adults from towns with strong regulations were not more likely to perceive lower adult smoking prevalence, but had more than twice the odds of perceiving that smoking was unacceptable in restaurants (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.02) or bars (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.90 to 3.31). CONCLUSIONS: Strong local restaurant smoking regulations are associated with favourable smoking related social norms among youths and adults.


Subject(s)
Restaurants/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude to Health , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Prevalence , Regression Analysis , Smoking/epidemiology , Social Behavior , Social Perception
4.
Tob Control ; 13(4): 403-8, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15564626

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To document the nature and prevalence of tobacco promotions in bars and clubs in a major US city. DESIGN: We conducted systematic observations in a representative sample of 38 establishments in the Boston area, half of which had been advertised in a tobacco company ad. We also observed seven events in six additional clubs hosting Camel Casbah promotions. Telephone interviews were later completed with club managers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Use of branded give-away items, distribution of free cigarette samples, managers' reports of costs and benefits of hosting promotions. RESULTS: The majority of the 38 clubs were observed to use bar paraphernalia including matchbooks with tobacco brand logos, regardless of their history of appearing in tobacco sponsored ads. Free cigarette samples were not observed at any of the sampled clubs, but were a feature of every Casbah event. Managers of clubs in the advertised group were somewhat more likely to report having hosted promotions, but 44% of managers of non-advertised clubs indicated that tobacco promotions had occurred in their establishments in the past. Approximately one third of club managers viewed public links with a tobacco company as a negative feature of hosting promotions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on managers' reports, tobacco promotions occurred in more than 50% of the Boston area entertainment venues frequented by young adults. Cigarette companies should be required to inform the attorney general of plans to conduct promotions in adult-only venues to facilitate monitoring of compliance with the Master Settlement Agreement. The negative health and business consequences of hosting promotions should be communicated to bar owners.


Subject(s)
Marketing/methods , Smoking , Tobacco Industry/methods , Adult , Advertising/methods , Age Factors , Attitude to Health , Boston , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Marketing/economics , Music
5.
Child Dev ; 72(6): 1794-813, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11768146

ABSTRACT

Researchers have renewed an interest in the harmful consequences of poverty on child development. This study builds on this work by focusing on one mechanism that links material hardship to child outcomes, namely the mediating effect of maternal depression. Using data from the National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, we found that maternal depression and poverty jeopardized the development of very young boys and girls, and to a certain extent, affluence buffered the deleterious consequences of depression. Results also showed that chronic maternal depression had severe implications for both boys and girls, whereas persistent poverty had a strong effect for the development of girls. The measures of poverty and maternal depression used in this study generally had a greater impact on measures of cognitive development than motor development.


Subject(s)
Child Development , Depression/psychology , Mothers/psychology , Poverty , Adolescent , Adult , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...