ABSTRACT
Background: Acromioclavicular (AC) horizontal instability is a problem affecting not only young athletic patients after a trauma to the AC joint but also older patients who have undergone distal clavicle resection. It may cause pain and poor functional outcomes unless the reconstruction technique specifically addresses the horizontal instability of the clavicle, in addition to the well-known superior instability. Methods: Three cadaveric specimens underwent dissection of the AC joint capsule to determine the superior attachments of the AC joint capsule. These shoulders subsequently underwent distal clavicle resection and were loaded to a 7-kg weight in the horizontal plane. The horizontal displacement of the clavicle was measured and resection continued to the point of horizontal instability of the clavicle. Thereafter, the reverse coracoacromial ligament reconstruction technique was performed and recreation of horizontal stability assessed. Utilization of the reverse coracoacromial ligament transfer in two clinical cases will also be presented. Results: The AC joint capsule is continuous with trapezius and deltoid insertions. The average distance between the articular surface and insertion of the capsule on the clavicle is 10 mm and on the acromion is 14.8 mm. Horizontal clavicular translation increased from 2.3 mm when intact to 3.3 mm with capsular transection, 8.7 mm with 5 mm clavicle resection, and finally 15 mm with a 10-mm clavicle resection. Horizontal instability of the clavicle was demonstrated with a 10-mm clavicle resection. Conclusion: Horizontal instability of the clavicle is evident with distal clavicle resection of greater than 10 mm. A reverse coracoacromial ligament transfer may be a reasonable technique to address horizontal stability of the clavicle during AC joint reconstruction in the context of painful instability.
ABSTRACT
Background and purpose - Prosthetic-joint infection (PJI) is the most serious complication of arthroplasty, and accurate identification of a potentially responsible microorganism is essential for successful antibiotic treatment. We therefore determined the diagnostic accuracy of sonication and compared it with tissue culture as a screening tool in detecting prosthetic joint infection in revision arthroplasty. Patients and methods - 252 consecutive revision arthroplasty cases were enrolled. These cases were determined as being suspected or unsuspected of having infection according to standard criteria. Perioperatively, 6 periprosthetic interface tissue biopsies were obtained from each patient and the implants removed were sonicated. The sensitivity and specificity of periprosthetic tissue culture and sonication fluid cultures were determined. Results - Preoperatively, 75 revision cases were classified as having PJI (33 early and 42 late) and 177 were unsuspected of having infection. Compared with tissue culture, the sensitivity of the sonication fluid analysis was low: 0.47 (95% CI: 0.35-0.59) for sonication as compared to 0.68 (95% CI: 0.56-0.78) for tissue culture. The specificity of the sonication fluid analysis was higher than that for tissue culture: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.96-1.0) as compared to 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.86). Interpretation - Sonication is a highly specific test for diagnosis of PJI. However, due to the low sensitivity, a negative sonication result does not rule out the presence of PJI. Thus, sonication is not of value for screening of microorganisms during revision surgery.
