IMPROvE-CED Trial: Intracoronary Autologous CD34+ Cell Therapy for Treatment of Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) causes angina/ischemia in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD). Patients with CED have decreased number and function of CD34+ cells involved in normal vascular repair with microcirculatory regenerative potential and paracrine anti-inflammatory effects. We evaluated safety and potential efficacy of intracoronary autologous CD34+ cell therapy for CED. METHODS: Twenty NOCAD patients with invasively diagnosed CED and persistent angina despite maximally tolerated medical therapy underwent baseline exercise stress test, GCSF (granulocyte colony stimulating factor)-mediated CD34+ cell mobilization, leukapheresis, and selective 1×105 CD34+ cells/kg infusion into left anterior descending. Invasive CED evaluation and exercise stress test were repeated 6 months after cell infusion. Primary end points were safety and effect of intracoronary autologous CD34+ cell therapy on CED at 6 months of follow-up. Secondary end points were change in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class, as-needed sublingual nitroglycerin use/day, Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores, and exercise time at 6 months. Change in CED was compared with that of 51 historic control NOCAD patients treated with maximally tolerated medical therapy alone. RESULTS: Mean age was 52±13 years; 75% were women. No death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred. Intracoronary CD34+ cell infusion improved microvascular CED (%acetylcholine-mediated coronary blood flow increased from 7.2 [-18.0 to 32.4] to 57.6 [16.3-98.3]%; P=0.014), decreased Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class (3.7±0.5 to 1.7±0.9, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P=0.00018), and sublingual nitroglycerin use/day (1 [0.4-3.5] to 0 [0-1], Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P=0.00047), and improved all Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores with no significant change in exercise time at 6 months of follow-up. Historic control patients had no significant change in CED. CONCLUSIONS: A single intracoronary autologous CD34+ cell infusion was safe and may potentially be an effective disease-modifying therapy for microvascular CED in humans. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03471611.

Intravascular Volume Profiles in Patients With Class I and II Systolic Heart Failure: Heterogeneity and Volume Overload Are Common Even in Mild Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Although volume overload is a commonly described clinical feature of advanced heart failure (HF), less is known regarding volume profiles of patients with less severe class I and II HF. METHODS: Intravascular volume was quantitated by radiolabeled-albumin indicator-dilution technique in clinic outpatients. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (age 61 ± 13years, left ventricular ejection fraction 30 ± 8%) were prospectively evaluated with 28 undergoing repeat evaluations at 1 year. There was no difference in averaged total blood volume (TBV) at baseline between class I (N = 26) and II (N = 20) patients (5.6 ± 1.6vs 6.0 ± 1.3 L, P = .368) and at 1-year of follow-up. However, there was marked heterogeneity in plasma volume (-13% to +69% of normal) and red cell mass (RBCM -31% to +50%) profiles with TBV expansion identified in 46% of the cohort, whereas only 48% had a normal TBV. RBCM deficit (true anemia) was common (39%), but a low hemoglobin concentration was accurate in identifying anemia in only 11% of the cohort. RBCM excess (polycythemia) also was identified in 20% of the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Marked heterogeneity in plasma volume and RBCM volume profiles is present even in mild HF, and identifying volume overload, which was common in early HF, has the potential to help guide therapy in the reduction of HF progression. Intravascular volume as a modifiable risk factor in early HF warrants further study.