Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: The Current Status of Disease Management.

BACKGROUND: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare genetic disease of autosomal dominant inheritance, with an estimated prevalence of 3-20/100 000. Its main feature is neuroendocrine neoplasia in the parathyroid glands, the endocrine pancreas, the duodenum, and the pituitary gland. In this article, we review the diagnostic and therapeutic options for MEN1-associated tumors. METHODS: We present an analysis and evaluation of retrospective case studies retrieved from PubMed, guidelines from Germany and abroad, and our own experience. RESULTS: The disease is caused by mutations in the MEN1 gene. Mutation carriers should participate in a regular, specialized screening program from their twenties onward. The early diagnosis and individualized treatment of MEN1-associated tumors can prevent the development of life-threatening hormonal syndromes and prolong the expected life span of MEN1 patients from 55 to 70 years, as well as improving their quality of life. Surgical treatment is based on the location, size, growth dynamics, and functional activity of the tumors. The evidence for treatment strategies is derived from retrospective studies only (level III evidence) and the optimal treatment is often a matter of debate. This is a further reason for treatment in specialized centers. CONCLUSION: MEN1 is a rare disease, and, consequently, the evidence base for its treatment is limited. Carriers of disease-causing mutations in the MEN1 gene should be cared for in specialized interdisciplinary centers, so that any appreciable tumor growth or hormonal activity can be detected early and organ-sparing treatment can be provided.

[Individualized approach for MEN1-associated duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms]. / Individualisiertes Vorgehen bei MEN1-assoziierten duodenopankreatischen neuroendokrinen Neoplasien.

BACKGROUND: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)-associated duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (dpNEN) represent the most frequent syndrome-associated cause of death, but the adequate treatment is sometimes considered controversial. OBJECTIVE: Presentation of possible diagnostic and therapeutic options for MEN1-associated dpNENs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this review article retrospective case studies, expert recommendations, national and international guidelines as well as personal experiences were analyzed and evaluated. RESULTS: Due to early detection programs and the use of the most modern imaging techniques, dpNEN are nowadays diagnosed much earlier. Nonfunctional pNENs currently represent the most frequent dpNENs with about 70%, followed by gastrinomas and insulinomas. Regardless of their functional activity, dpNENs with a size of > 2 cm are generally an indication for surgery. The choice of the optimal treatment strategy, however, in most cases remains the subject of controversial discussions, although nowadays surgery should always be performed in an organ-preserving and minimally invasive way when feasible. Recurrences or new dpNENs are expected in more than 60% of cases, necessitating a reoperation in up to 40% of these cases. Duodenopancreatic resections and reoperations can be carried out safely by experienced practitioners and with an acceptable level of risk. CONCLUSION: The planning of treatment requires careful consideration of the suitable timing, the extent of the operation, the risk of recurrence and potential morbidities. Furthermore, preserving pancreatic function and the quality of life is of utmost importance. In view of the complexity of the disease, MEN1 patients should be treated in specialized centers.

Regional Growth Velocity and Incidence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasias in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (pNENs) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 are predominantly found in the dorsal anlage. Whether their growth velocity and incidence might be related to their location in the pancreas has not been investigated yet. METHODS: We studied 117 patients using endoscopic ultrasound. RESULTS: Growth velocity could be calculated for 389 pNENs. Increase of largest tumor diameter (% per month) was 0.67 (standard deviation [SD], 2.04) in the pancreatic tail (n = 138), 1.12 (SD, 3.00) in the pancreatic body (n = 100), 0.58 (SD, 1.19) in the pancreatic head/uncinate process-dorsal anlage (n = 130), and 0.68 (SD, 0.77) in the pancreatic head/uncinate process-ventral anlage (n = 12). Comparing growth velocity of all pNENs in the dorsal (n = 368, 0.76 [SD, 2.13]) versus ventral anlage, no significant difference was detected. Annual tumor incidence rate was 0.21 in the pancreatic tail, 0.13 in the pancreatic body, 0.17 in the pancreatic head/uncinate process-dorsal anlage, 0.51 dorsal anlage together, and 0.02 in the pancreatic head/uncinate process-ventral anlage. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 pNENs are unequally distributed between ventral (low prevalence and incidence) and dorsal anlage. However, there are no regional differences in growth behavior.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasias in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 Are Predominantly Located in the Dorsal Anlage: An Endoscopic Ultrasound Study.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (pNENs) frequently occur in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Their distribution referring to embryology, that is, the pancreatic anlagen, has not been investigated yet. METHODS: In the time between 1998 and 2019, we studied the distribution of pNENs in MEN1 concerning the embryologic origin of the pancreas, that is, the dorsal versus ventral anlage using endoscopic ultrasound in 117 MEN1 patients: 56 women, 61 men; aged 40 years (standard deviation, 14 years) at first endoscopic ultrasound. RESULTS: In 105 patients, a total of 628 pNENs were detected. They were located in the pancreatic tail: 231; pancreatic body: 177; pancreatic head/uncinate process: 220. Of the latter, 22 were located in the ventral anlage, 176 in the dorsal anlage, and 22 remained undefined. In summary, just 3.5% of all detected pNENs were located in the ventral anlage, 93.0% in the dorsal anlage, and 3.5% could not be assigned. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the vast majority of pNENs in MEN1 is located in the dorsal anlage, whereas the ventral anlage of the pancreas seems to be to a large extend spared from pNENs. Implications for new surgical strategies might be considered.

Gastric enterochromaffin-like cell changes in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

BACKGROUND: Gastric enterochromaffin-like cell (ECL) tumours can occur in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), especially in those affected by Zollinger Ellison syndrome (ZES). Since the prevalence of ECL lesions is not well defined yet, the present study evaluated the presence and extent of ECL lesions in MEN1 patients with and without ZES. METHODS: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 patients being part of a regular screening program (2014-2018) underwent gastroduodenoscopies with biopsies of the stomach and determination of serum gastrin and chromogranin A levels. Haematoxylin- and immunostaining with chromogranin A, gastrin and VMAT I and II (vesicular monoamine transporter I and II) of the biopsies were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight MEN1 patients, of whom 16 (42%) were diagnosed and treated earlier for ZES, were analysed. In ten of 16 (62.5%) ZES patients, a locally scattered, mixed image of diffuse, linear and micronodular mild hyperplasia was present. In addition, two of these patients (13%) showed small (max 1.5 mm in size) intramucosal ECL tumours. Neither ECL changes, nor tumours were found in MEN1 patients without ZES (n = 22). In MEN1/ZES patients, the median serum gastrin level was significantly elevated compared to MEN1 patients without ZES (206 pg/ml vs. 30.5 pg/ml, p < .001). A subgroup analysis of the serum gastrin and chromogranin A levels of MEN1/ZES patients with or without ECL hyperplasia did not show significant differences (gastrin level: p = .302, chromogranin A: p = .464). CONCLUSION: Enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia and gastric carcinoids occur only in MEN1 patients with ZES, but less frequently than reported.

Complications of surgery for gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias.

PURPOSE: Surgery is recommended for most patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (GEP-NENs). Rates of complications and perioperative mortality have been reported in few mostly retrospective single-center series, but there has been no detailed analysis on risk factors for perioperative complications and mortality to date. METHODS: Data of patients with GEP-NENs operated between January 2015 and September 2018 were retrieved from EUROCRINE©, a European online endocrine surgical quality registry, and analyzed regarding rate and risk factors of surgical complications. Risk factors were assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Some 376 patients (211 female, 167 male; age median 63, range 15-89 years) were included. Most NENs were located in the small intestine (SI) (n = 132) or pancreas (n = 111), the rest in the stomach (n = 34), duodenum (n = 30), appendix (n = 30), colon, and rectum (n = 22), or with unknown primary (n = 15). Of the tumors, 320 (85.1%) were well or moderately differentiated, and 147 (39.1%) of the patients had distant metastases at the time of operation. Severe complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥ 3) occurred in 56 (14.9%) patients, and 4 (1.1%) patients died perioperatively. Severe complications were more frequent in surgery for duodenopancreatic NENs (n = 31; 22.0%) compared with SI-NENs (n = 15; 11.4%) (p = 0.014), in patients with lymph node metastases operated with curative aim of surgery (n = 24; 21.4%) versus non-metastasized tumors or palliative surgery (n = 32; 12.1%) (p = 0.020), and in functioning tumors (n = 20; 23.0%) versus non-functioning tumors (n = 30; 13.5%) (p = 0.042). Complication rates were not significantly associated with tumor stage or grade. CONCLUSIONS: Severe complications are frequent in GEP-NEN surgery. Besides duodenopancreatic tumor location, curative resection of nodal metastases and functioning tumors are risk factors for complications.

Gender Differences in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: Implications for Screening?

BACKGROUND: Some gender-related differences have been reported in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), although not all reports are conclusive. This systematic review with analysis of the own MEN1 cohort evaluates gender differences and potential consequences for screening. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature between 1990 and 2019 with the search terms "MEN1" or "multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1" and "gender" or "sex" was performed. In addition, the prospectively collected data of a genetically confirmed MEN1 cohort of the Philipps University Marburg were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Review of the literature identified five retrospective case series with original data of 1,057 MEN1 patients. One series suggested a higher frequency of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), especially gastrinomas, in men (61 vs. 54%) and a higher frequency of pituitary tumors in women (47 vs. 30%), but others did not. Only thymic NEN occurred predominantly in men throughout all studies. Women with MEN1 were found to have an increased risk of breast cancer. In the own series consisting of 116 MEN1 patients (male = 58, female = 58), thymic lesions were also more frequently detected in male patients (male = 5, female = 1). No gender difference was found with regard to the other manifestations. CONCLUSION: Regarding the typical MEN1 tumor manifestations, gender-adapted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches cannot be recommended. Female MEN1 patients should be encouraged to participate in breast cancer screening programs.

Single gland excision for MEN1-associated primary hyperparathyroidism.

IMPORTANCE: Guidelines advocate subtotal parathyroidectomy (SPTX) or total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation (TPTX) with bilateral cervical thymectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). However, both procedures are associated with a significant risk of permanent hypoparathyroidism. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to compare long-term results of either single gland excision (SGE, 1-2 glands), SPTX and TPTX for the treatment of MEN1-associated pHPT. DESIGN AND SETTING: Data of genetically confirmed MEN1 patients who underwent surgery for pHPT between 1987 and 2017 were retrieved from a prospective database and were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-nine MEN1 patients underwent either TPTX (n = 38, 42.7%), SPTX (n = 23, 25.8%) or SGE (n = 28, 31.5%). The rate of disease persistence after initial surgery was 2.6%, 0% and 14.2% in the TPTX, SPTX and SGE groups, respectively. After median follow-up of 112 (range 7-411) months, the rate of recurrent pHPT was significantly higher in the SGE group (n = 19, 21.3%) compared with the TPTX (n = 4, 4.4%, P = .001) and the SPTX (n = 9, 10.1%, P = .03) groups. Analysis of the recurrence-free time among the surgical groups revealed a significant difference (P = .036). The median time to recurrence was significantly shorter after SGE (101, range 3-301 months) than after SPTX (139, range 28-278 months, P = .018) and TPTX (204, range 75-396 months, P = .049). Twelve (32%) patients who underwent TPTX developed permanent hypoparathyroidism compared with only 4 (17%, P = .06) in the SPTX and 0 in the SGE group (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Given the high rate of postoperative permanent hypoparathyroidism after TPTX and SPTX, SGE is a valid option for the treatment of MEN1-associated pHPT.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thyroid Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic central neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma is controversial. Sentinel node biopsy might be an adjunct to optimize surgical treatment for these patients. Earlier studies reported inconsistent detection rates and diagnostic value of this technique, and the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thyroid cancer needs to be established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a single-center prospective interventional study between 2010 and 2017, sentinel lymph node biopsy using 99mTc-nanocolloidal albumin tracer was performed on patients undergoing thyroid surgery for suspected thyroid cancer by fine needle aspiration cytology. All eligible patients without clinical lymph node involvement were invited to participate. Central neck dissection was performed on all patients after the detection of sentinel lymph nodes. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients participated in the study. The detection rates of the sentinel node were 67% and 45% by scintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe, respectively. The detection rate was not associated with Bethesda score, malignancy, or presence of lymph node metastases. Sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 80%, 97%, and 98%, respectively, for the sentinel node to represent the status of lymph node metastasis in the central neck compartment. The false negative rate was 20%. CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy had a low detection rate and only moderate sensitivity in patients with suspected thyroid carcinoma and is not a useful adjunct to surgery in the context of current treatment concepts.

Contemporary surgical management of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

About 30% of patients with MEN1 develop a Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Meanwhile it is well established that the causative gastrinomas are almost exclusively localized in the duodenum and not in the pancreas, MEN1 gastrinomas occur multicentric and are associated with hyperplastic gastrin cell lesions and tiny gastrin-producing micro tumors in contrast to sporadic duodenal gastrinomas. Regardless of the high prevalence of early lymphatic metastases, the survival is generally good with an aggressive course of disease in only about 20% of patients. Symptoms can be controlled medically. The indication, timing, type, and extent of surgery are highly controversial and are discussed in detail in this article by a thorough and critical review of literature. More radical procedures, like partial pancreaticoduodenectomy, are weighed against less aggressive local excision of gastrinomas and the pros and cons of both approaches are discussed in terms of long-term morbidity, biochemical cure, and survival.

Results of Duodenopancreatic Reoperations in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the outcome of duodenopancreatic reoperations in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). METHODS: MEN1 patients who underwent reoperations for duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (dpNENs) were retrieved from a prospective database and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Twelve of 101 MEN1 patients underwent up to three reoperations, resulting in a total of 18 reoperations for dpNEN recurrence. Patients initially underwent either formal pancreatic resections (n = 7), enucleations (n = 3), or duodenotomy with lymphadenectomy for either NF-pNEN (seven patients), Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES, three patients), organic hyperinsulinism (one patient) or VIPoma (one patient). Six patients had malignant dpNENs with lymph node (n = 5) and/or liver metastases (n = 2). The indication of reoperations was NF-pNEN (five patients), ZES (five patients), organic hyperinsulinism (one patient), and recurrent VIPoma (one patient). Median time to first reoperation was 67.5 (range 6-251) months. Five patients required a second duodenopancreatic reoperation for 60-384 months after initial surgery, and one patient underwent a third reoperation after 249 months. The rate of complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) was 28%. Four patients required completion pancreatectomy. Six patients developed pancreoprivic diabetes. After a median follow-up of 18 (6-34) years after initial surgery, ten of 12 patients are alive, one died of metastatic pancreatic VIPoma, and one died of metastatic thymic NEN. CONCLUSION: Reoperations are frequently necessary for dpNEN in MEN1 patients, but are not associated with an increased perioperative morbidity in specialized centers. Organ-sparing resections should be preferred as initial duodenopancreatic procedures to maintain pancreatic function and avoid completion pancreatectomy.

Chemoprevention with Enalapril and Aspirin in Men1(+/T) Knockout Mouse Model.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (pNEN) are the most common cause of death in adult patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). So far, only few chemopreventive strategies (e.g., with somatostatin analogues) have been evaluated for MEN1 associated pNENs. In this experimental study on 75 Men1(+/T) knockout mice, the effect of aspirin (n = 25) and an inhibitor of angiotensin-I converting enzyme (enalapril, n = 25) compared to controls (n = 25) were evaluated as single chemopreventive strategies for pNENs after 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 months. After each study period, mice were sacrificed and the resected pancreata were evaluated by histopathological analysis, immunostaining, and real-time PCR. PNEN size and number was measured. Aspirin and enalapril lead to a pNEN size reduction of 80% (167,518 vs. 838,876 µm2, p < 0.001) and 79% (174,758 vs. 838,876 µm2, p < 0.001) compared to controls. Furthermore, aspirin and enalapril treatment resulted in a significant reduction of the number of pNENs by 33%, (p = 0.04) and 41% (p = 0.002) respectively. The apoptosis marker caspase 3 revealed a higher positive expression in pNEN of treated Men1(+/T) mice. Immunostaining of VEGF in pNEN detected a downregulation of its expression in treated Men1(+/T) mice compared to the control group. REL A transcript was significantly downregulated in 18-months treated enalapril Men1(+/T) mice, but not in aspirin-treated Men1(+/T) mice. There was no significant difference in the Ki-67 index. Using a transgenic mouse model that imitates human MEN1, this study provides first evidence that aspirin and enalapril are effective chemopreventive agents that aid in the progression of pNENs.

The future: diagnostic and imaging advances in MEN1 therapeutic approaches and management strategies.

Prospective randomized data are lacking, but current clinical expert guidelines recommend annual screening examinations, including laboratory assessments and various imaging modalities (e.g. CT, MRI, scintigraphy and EUS) for patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Routine screening is proposed to detect and localize neuroendocrine manifestations as early as possible. The goal is timely intervention to improve quality of life and to increase life expectancy by preventing the development of life-threatening hormonal syndromes and/or metastatic disease. In recent years, some studies compared different and new imaging methods regarding their sensitivity and utility in MEN1 patients. This present article reviews the proposed diagnostic tools for MEN1 screening as well as potential future perspectives.

Is Routine Screening of Young Asymptomatic MEN1 Patients Necessary?

BACKGROUND: Recent clinical practice guidelines recommend that routine screening of MEN1 mutation carriers should start at the age of 5 years. The occurrence of clinically relevant MEN1 organ manifestations in children (≤18 years) was evaluated. METHODS: Two prospective collected databases of MEN1 patients (n = 166) who underwent annual screening were retrospectively analyzed for organ manifestations in MEN1 patients ≤18 years. The follow-up was based on the most recent screening examination until December 2015. RESULTS: Twenty [11 females, 9 males, (12%)] of 166 MEN1 patients were diagnosed with at least one organ manifestation at age ≤18 years. The most frequent manifestation was mild asymptomatic pHPT (n = 9, 45%, age range 8-18 years). Eight (40%) young patients had pNENs (three non-functioning pNENs, five insulinomas, age range 9-18 years). All five insulinomas were diagnosed based on hypoglycemic symptoms. The other organ manifestations were asymptomatic pituitary adenomas in six patients (30%, age range 15-18 years) and a bronchial carcinoid in one 15-year-old patient. Only six (30%) patients ≤18 years had clinically relevant organ manifestations. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic or severe manifestations in MEN1 patients rarely occur below the age of 16 years. With regard to psychological burden and cost-effectiveness, routine screening of asymptomatic MEN1 patients should be postponed at least until the age of 16 years.

Limited Value of Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT in Routine Screening of Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.

BACKGROUND: Routine screening is recommended for patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) to enable early detection and treatment of associated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). Gallium68-DOTATOC-Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT) is a very sensitive and specific imaging technique for the detection of sporadic neuroendocrine tumors. The present study evaluated the value of Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT in routine screening of patients with MEN1. METHODS: Between January 2014 and March 2016, all MEN1 patients underwent Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT in addition to conventional imaging (computed tomography of the thorax, magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pituitary, endoscopic ultrasonography). The diagnostic yield of conventional imaging and Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT was prospectively documented and compared, and treatment changes caused by the addition of Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT were recorded. RESULTS: Conventional imaging detected 145 NENs, mainly pancreaticoduodenal NENs (n = 117, 81%), in 31 of 33 MEN1 patients. Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT detected 55 NENs in 23 of the 33 patients (p = 0.0001). Ninety (62%) NENs detected by conventional imaging were missed by DOTATOC-PET-CT. The majority of missed lesions were pNEN (n = 68; 74%). The sensitivity of Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT for NENs <5, 5-9, 10-19 and ≥20 mm was 0, 29, 81 and 100%, respectively. However, Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT detected more liver and lymph node metastases in patients with known metastatic disease, which did not lead to a change of patients' management. In one patient (3%), Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT was the only imaging modality that detected a small intestine NEN and led to potentially curative surgery. CONCLUSION: Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET-CT cannot be recommended for routine screening of MEN1 patients. It might provide important additional information in patients with suspected or known metastatic disease.

An unusual phenotype of MEN1 syndrome with a SI-NEN associated with a deletion of the MEN1 gene.

UNLABELLED: We report about a young female who developed an unusual and an aggressive phenotype of the MEN1 syndrome characterized by the development of a pHPT, malignant non-functioning pancreatic and duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasias, a pituitary adenoma, a non-functioning adrenal adenoma and also a malignant jejunal NET at the age of 37 years. Initial Sanger sequencing could not detect a germline mutation of the MEN1 gene, but next generation sequencing and MPLA revealed a deletion of the MEN1 gene ranging between 7.6 and 25.9 kb. Small intestine neuroendocrine neoplasias (SI-NENs) are currently not considered to be a part of the phenotype of the MEN1-syndrome. In our patient the SI-NENs were detected during follow-up imaging on Ga68-Dotatoc PET/CT and could be completely resected. Although SI-NENs are extremely rare, these tumors should also be considered in MEN1 patients. Whether an aggressive phenotype or the occurrence of SI-NENs in MEN1 are more likely associated with large deletions of the gene warrants further investigation. LEARNING POINTS: Our patient presents an extraordinary course of disease.Although SI-NENs are extremely rare, these tumors should also be considered in MEN1 patients, besides the typical MEN1 associated tumors.This case reports indicate that in some cases conventional mutation analysis of MEN1 patients should be supplemented by the search for larger gene deletions with modern techniques, if no germline mutation could be identified by Sanger sequencing.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatic Surgery in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.

OBJECTIVE: The role of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is not well defined. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of minimally invasive versus open pancreatic resections in patients with MEN1. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data of MEN1 patients who underwent a primary distal pancreatic resection and/or enucleation for non-functioning pNENs or insulinoma were retrospectively analyzed regarding the outcome of minimally invasive or open pancreatic resections. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent primary pancreatic resection for either organic hyperinsulinism (n = 9, 27 %) or non-functioning pNENs >1 cm in size (n = 24, 73 %) between 1987 and 2015. 21 (64 %) patients underwent an open surgical (group 1) and 12 patients (36 %) a minimally invasive approach, either laparoscopic (n = 8) or robotic assisted (n = 4) (group 2). Both groups were comparable regarding age, gender, number, and size of pancreatic tumors. In both groups, the hyperinsulinism of all patients (9/9,100 %) could be cured and all NF-pNENs >1 cm could be resected. Group 2 had a significant shorter operative time (200 vs. 260 min; p = 0.036), less intraoperative blood loss (120 vs. 280 ml; p < 0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (11 vs. 15.5 days; p = 0.034). The rate of patients with postoperative complications, especially postoperative pancreatic fistulas, was not different between groups (62 % group 1 vs. 67 % group 2, p = 0.74). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive distal pancreatic resections and enucleations are feasible and safe in MEN1 patients with insulinoma or non-functioning pNENs.

Bronchopulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Their Precursor Lesions in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence and clinical behavior of bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (bNET) associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) are not well defined. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, potential precursor lesions and prognosis of bNET in patients with MEN1. METHODS: A database of 75 prospectively collected MEN1 cases was retrospectively analyzed for bNET. Patient characteristics, imaging and treatment were evaluated. Resection specimens of operated patients were reassessed by two specialized pathologists. Available CT scans of the whole cohort were reviewed to determine the prevalence of bronchopulmonary nodules. RESULTS: Five of the 75 MEN1 patients (6.6%; 2 male, 3 female) developed histologically confirmed bNET after a median follow-up of 134 months. The median age at diagnosis of bNET was 47 years (range 31-67), and all patients were asymptomatic. Four patients underwent anatomic lung resections with lymphadenectomy; the remaining patient with multiple lesions had only a wedge resection of the largest bNET. Tumor sizes ranged from 7 to 32 mm in diameter, and all bNET were well differentiated. Two patients had lymph node metastases. Two of 4 reevaluated resection specimens revealed multifocal bNET, and 3 specimens showed tumorlets (up to 3) associated with multifocal areas of a neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia within the subsegmental bronchi. One bNET-related death (1.3%) occurred during long-term follow-up. Review of the available CT scans of the patients without proven bNET revealed small bronchopulmonary lesions (≥3 mm) in 16 of 53 cases (30.2%). CONCLUSIONS: bNET in MEN1 might be more common than previously recognized. Their natural course seems to be rather benign. Multifocal tumorlets and multifocal neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia might represent their precursor lesions.

Dermal metastases in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Dermal metastases in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck are rare. The purpose of this study was to evaluate incidence, site, prognostic significance, and treatment modalities of dermal metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher exact test, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with dermal metastases were evaluated. Dermal metastases were located in the neck, face, chest wall, and upper extremities. The median time from diagnosis of the primary tumor to the occurrence of dermal metastases was 16 months. Survival after manifestation of dermal metastases ranged from 1 to 65 weeks. Localization and treatment of dermal metastases did not significantly correlate with survival. CONCLUSION: Dermal metastases indicate the terminal phase of disease. No positive effect of certain therapy modalities could be validated. Therefore, invasive therapies should be abandoned in favor of best supportive care.