Incidental finding of cornea verticillata or lamellar inclusions in kidney biopsy: measurement of lyso-Gb3 in plasma defines between Fabry disease and drug-induced phospholipidosis.

INTRODUCTION: Therapy with cationic amphiphilic drugs (Amiodarone or hydroxychloroquine) may result in biochemically and ultrastructurally similar lipid inclusions in many cells also affected by Fabry disease (FD). In addition, it often results in similar clinical manifestations such as cornea verticillata. This may lead to a FD misdiagnosis, especially when a complete medical history is not available to the ophthalmologist confronted with cornea verticillata or to the pathologist examining a kidney biopsy. When enzymatic/genetic test or pathological studies are not conclusive, a specific biomarker may help clarify this dilemma. The plasma globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3) assay has high sensitivity and specificity and is elevated above normal levels in FD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured plasma lyso-Gb3 levels in male patients receiving Amiodarone or hydroxychloroquine and compared it with male patients with classic and late onset variant of FD. RESULTS: In all Fabry patients (classic and late onset variant) α-GalA activity was deficient in dried blood spot and plasma lyso-Gb3 was above normal levels. Patients on treatment with Amiodarone or hydroxychloroquine had normal values for α-GalA activity and lyso-Gb3 in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Even when Amiodarone or hydroxychloroquine may decrease α-GalA activity in vitro or in cell culture, our results showed that in all patients lyso-Gb3 plasma levels remain normal with no evidence of reduction in α-GalA activity, confirming the specificity of this biomarker for the diagnosis of FD.

The value of repeat kidney biopsy in quiescent Argentinian lupus nephritis patients.

BACKGROUND: The duration of maintenance therapy after induction therapy for lupus nephritis has not been rigorously established. A common practice is to maintain immunosuppression for 1-2 years after complete remission, and longer for partial remission. The present work addresses whether a repeat kidney biopsy might be informative in deciding who should continue immunosuppression after complete or partial remission. METHODS: The practice in a large Buenos Aires nephrology unit is to repeat a kidney biopsy before finalizing the decision to withdraw or continue immunosuppression. This work reports on a cohort of 25 Hispanic patients that had two or more kidney biopsies, the last occurring after at least 24 months of clinically quiescent disease. RESULTS: Despite normalization of serum creatinine and reduction of proteinuria to <500 mg/d, 30% of patients still had significant activity at the last biopsy. Conversely, 60% of patients with ongoing proteinuria (500-1000 mg/d), or stable but abnormal serum creatinine, had no activity by biopsy. Univariate association analyses demonstrated that improvement in the activity index (AI) of the last biopsy was associated with choice of induction therapy (cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate), improvement in serum creatinine over the first six months of treatment, and improvement in complement component C4. By multivariate regression analyses, two AI prediction models emerged. Cyclophosphamide plus change in serum creatinine or cyclophosphamide plus change in C4 accounted for 50% of the improvement in AI. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a repeat biopsy may be useful in making the decision to withdraw or continue maintenance immunosuppression.