Relationships between impact on employment, working conditions, socio-occupational categories and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder after the industrial disaster in Toulouse, France.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this paper were (1) to analyze the prevalence of symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (S-PTSD) in a population of workers 1 year after an industrial disaster; and (2) to assess the role of factors of vulnerability such as the occupational impact of a disaster and economic conditions. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey assessing the relationships between socio-occupational category, impact on employment and S-PTSD was conducted by the self-administered impact of event scale-revised. RESULTS: The prevalence of S-PTSD in workers in the peripheral zone (<3 km around the explosion site) was 12% in men and 18% in women. Factors significantly associated with S-PTSD in men were non-managerial socio-occupational category: employees (ORa = 4.3; [2.3; 7.8]), factory workers/laborers (ORa = 3.7; [1.8; 7.6]), intermediate professions (ORa = 3.3; [1.9; 5.9]), and artisans (ORa = 3; [1.3; 7.7]); and layoff (ORa = 2.6; [1.5; 4.5]) or unusable workplace after the explosion (ORa = 1.8; [1.1; 2.8]). In women, factors significantly associated with S-PTSD were the socio-occupational categories of employees and factory workers (ORa = 2.2; [1.4; 3.5]), artisans (ORa = 2.7; [1.3; 5.7]) and intermediate professions, (ORa = 1.5; [1; 2.3]) and reporting of an occupational accident (ORa = 1.5; [1.1; 2.2]). CONCLUSION: Impact on the workplace and socioeconomic conditions were associated with S-PTSD. The epidemiological approach in disaster situations needs to be improved, particularly in the social and occupational dimension when economically active populations are involved. Vulnerable subgroups, defined by occupational impact and low socioeconomic category, should be taken into account.

Psychosocial risk factors for depressive symptoms after the AZF chemical factory explosion in Toulouse, France.

BACKGROUND: On 21 September 2001, a huge explosion occurred in a chemical plant in Toulouse. The hypothesis of the study was that the level of depressive symptoms after an industrial disaster would be related to the intensity of exposure and the characteristics of the exposed population, as well as to the consequences of the disaster during the following months. METHODS: A random sample of the population living close to the plant at the time of the explosion was included in a cross-sectional study, and 811 persons aged > 18 years were interviewed at home. The depressive symptoms score was analysed by gender in relation to characteristics of the population before the explosion, immediate exposure to the explosion and post-trauma factors. RESULTS: The mean depressive symptoms scores (± SD) 18 months after the explosion were 17.8 (± 1) in women and 13.5 (± 1) in men. Age > 45 years and psychiatric treatment in the previous year; high immediate exposure (proximity to the site at the time of the explosion < 2500 m); and post-trauma factors such as financial difficulties or physical sequelae during the months after the disaster were related to a higher depressive symptoms score in both men and women. CONCLUSION: In the population living near the site of an industrial explosion, individual vulnerability, exposure and post-trauma factors were associated with depressive symptoms. All three sets of factors need to be taken into account when planning a response to a disaster and reducing the psychological aftermath.

Poor blood pressure control in general practice: in search of explanations.

BACKGROUND: Arterial hypertension is managed mainly by general practitioners. The blood pressure level of most patients treated in a general practice setting is greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg. AIMS: To understand why a blood pressure level greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg does not lead to a change of treatment. METHODS: Over a 2-week period, 479 hypertensive patients were included in a cross-sectional study by 27 general practitioners. Consultation data were collected, as were reasons why patients with a blood pressure level greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg did not have their treatment changed. RESULTS: Blood pressure level was greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg in 58% of patients; treatment was changed in 15% of these individuals. The lack of change in treatment was justified by the physicians as follows: the blood pressure measurements were not considered to be representative (about 30% of cases); the therapeutic result was considered to be satisfactory in the circumstances (about 30% of cases); change was not appropriate given the patient's specific context (the remaining third of cases). The proportion of uncontrolled hypertensive patients whose treatment remained the same was significantly higher among patients with a disease that affected their lifestyle or threatened their life expectancy. CONCLUSION: The disappointing therapeutic results observed in the management of arterial hypertension do not arise only from poor application of guidelines by general practitioners. Reluctance to rely on blood pressure measurements, a perception that guidelines are revised frequently and are not always clear, and consideration of the general practitioner's activity in the patient's specific context are the main factors involved.