Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ther Drug Monit ; 45(2): 200-208, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36622029

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Antimicrobial stewardship programs are important for reducing antimicrobial resistance because they can readjust antibiotic prescriptions to local guidelines, switch intravenous to oral administration, and reduce hospitalization times. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) empirically based prescriptions and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) programs are essential for antimicrobial stewardship, but there is a need to fit protocols according to cost benefits. The cost benefits can be demonstrated by reducing toxicity and hospital stay, decreasing the amount of drug used per day, and preventing relapses in infection. Our aim was to review the data available on whether PK-PD empirically based prescriptions and TDM could improve the cost benefits of an antimicrobial stewardship program to decrease global hospital expenditures. METHODS: A narrative review based on PubMed search with the relevant studies of vancomycin, aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, and voriconazole. RESULTS: TDM protocols demonstrated important cost benefit for patients treated with vancomycin, aminoglycosides, and voriconazole mainly due to reduce toxicities and decreasing the hospital length of stay. In addition, PK-PD strategies that used infusion modifications to meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, and cefepime, such as extended or continuous infusion, demonstrated important cost benefits, mainly due to reducing daily drug needs and lengths of hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: TDM protocols and PK-PD empirically based prescriptions improve the cost-benefits and decrease the global hospital expenditures.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Vancomycin , Humans , Aminoglycosides , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ceftazidime , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Monitoring , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Voriconazole
2.
Microb Drug Resist ; 25(9): 1266-1274, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216222

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aims of the study are to evaluate the activity of sulbactam, meropenem, and polymyxin B alone and in combination against six isolates of extremely drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and to determine dosing regimens that achieve a sufficient joint probability of target attainment (PTA) based on combination antimicrobial pharmacodynamics. Materials and Methods: The combinations were evaluated by the checkerboard method and were considered synergistic when the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) ≤0.5. Pharmacodynamic analyses were carried out by evaluating dosing regimens that achieve ≥90% joint PTA at the percentage of time over a 24-h period wherein the free drug concentration is above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT> MIC) of 40% and 60% for meropenem and sulbactam, respectively, and 20 for the ratio of the area under the free drug concentration-time curve over MIC (fAUC/MIC) for polymyxin B. Results: For both polymyxin B-resistant and susceptible isolates, the addition of sulbactam in combination with meropenem and subinhibitory concentration of polymyxin B showed important synergistic activity (five isolates; FICI ≤0.281); the recommended dosing regimens were 2/4 g meropenem/sulbactam q8 hours and 0.5 mg/kg polymyxin B q12 hours. Conclusion: This in vitro study showed that sulbactam can significantly improve the action of meropenem and polymyxin B in OXA-producing A. baumannii isolates, especially when there are no new treatment options available for infections caused by these microorganisms.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Meropenem/pharmacology , Polymyxin B/pharmacology , Sulbactam/pharmacology , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Combinations , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Drug Synergism , Humans , Meropenem/administration & dosage , Meropenem/pharmacokinetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymyxin B/administration & dosage , Polymyxin B/pharmacokinetics , Sulbactam/administration & dosage , Sulbactam/pharmacokinetics
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30910903

ABSTRACT

Fosfomycin combined with other antimicrobials has shown good efficacy against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in both in vitro and clinical studies; however, the activity of fosfomycin combined with other antimicrobials against metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains has not been tested. The objective of this study was to determine the synergism and optimal intravenous dosing regimens of fosfomycin with meropenem against MDR and MBL-producing P. aeruginosa strains. The MICs of both antimicrobials were determined by the checkerboard method and analyzed by two synergism tests with 19 clones of P. aeruginosa isolates, 10 of which were MBL producers. A pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis was performed for meropenem (administered at 1 g every 8 h [q8h], 1.5 g every 6 h [q6h], and 2 g q8h) and fosfomycin (administered at 4 g q8h, 4 g q6h, 6 g q8h, and 8 g q8h) regimens with a dose reduction for renal impairment by determining the probability of target attainment (PTA) for target PD indices of meropenem (the percentage of the time in a 24-h duration at which the free drug concentration remains above the MIC [fT>MIC], ≥40%) and fosfomycin (the ratio of the area under the free drug concentration-versus-time curve over 24 h and the MIC [fAUC/MIC], ≥40.8). The combination reduced the MIC50 and MIC90 by 8-fold. Seven (44%) isolates with MICs in the intermediate or resistant ranges became sensitive to meropenem. For the MBL-producing isolates, the combination resulted in 40% of isolates becoming sensitive to meropenem. The meropenem regimens reached a PTA of ≥90% (MIC = 4 µg/ml) in 6 (32%) isolates when they were used as monotherapy and 13 (68%) isolates when they were combined with fosfomycin. None of the fosfomycin monotherapy regimens reached the PTA of ≥90% (MIC = 16 µg/ml). When combined with meropenem, the fosfomycin regimens reached the PTA of ≥90% in 14 (74%) isolates. The increase in pharmacodynamic activities resulting from the synergistic action of meropenem with fosfomycin demonstrates the potential relevance of this combination to fight infections caused by MDR and MBL-producing P. aeruginosa strains.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Meropenem/pharmacology , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Adult , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzymology
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28607025

ABSTRACT

Fosfomycin is widely used for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI), and it has recently been recommended that fosfomycin be used to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli. Whether urine acidification can improve bacterial susceptibility to fosfomycin oral dosing regimens has not been analyzed. The MIC of fosfomycin for 245 Gram-negative bacterial isolates, consisting of 158 Escherichia coli isolates and 87 Klebsiella isolates which were collected from patients with urinary tract infections, were determined at pH 6.0 and 7.0 using the agar dilution method. Monte Carlo simulation of the urinary fosfomycin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) after a single oral dose of 3,000 mg fosfomycin and the MIC distribution were used to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA). Fosfomycin was effective against E. coli (MIC90 ≤ 16 µg/ml) but not against Klebsiella spp. (MIC90 > 512 µg/ml). Acidification of the environment increased the susceptibility of 71% of the bacterial isolates and resulted in a statistically significant decrease in bacterial survival. The use of a regimen consisting of a single oral dose of fosfomycin against an E. coli isolate with an MIC of ≤64 mg/liter was able to achieve a PTA of ≥90% for a target pharmacodynamic index (AUC/MIC) of 23 in urine; PTA was not achieved when the MIC was higher than 64 mg/liter. The cumulative fractions of the bacterial responses (CFR) were 99% and 55% against E. coli and Klebsiella spp., respectively, based on simulated drug exposure in urine with an acidic pH of 6.0. A decrease of the pH from 7.0 to 6.0 improved the PTA and CFR of the target pharmacodynamic index in both E. coli and Klebsiella isolates.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Fosfomycin/therapeutic use , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella/drug effects , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Area Under Curve , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Klebsiella/isolation & purification , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology
5.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(7): 4128-39, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27139468

ABSTRACT

KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae causes serious infections associated with high death rates worldwide. Combination therapy consisting of fosfomycin and a carbapenem is better than monotherapy to combat multidrug-resistant microorganisms, but no dosages for the combination have been defined. The MICs of meropenem and fosfomycin were evaluated against 18 clinical isolates of KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae The activities of combination antimicrobials were also determined by the checkerboard method. The MIC50 and MIC90 of each agent alone and in combination were challenged against short (1.5-h) or prolonged (3-h) infusion regimens of meropenem (1 g every 8 h [q8h], 1.5 g q6h, 2 g q8h) and fosfomycin (4 g q8h, 6 g q6h, 8 g q8h) by Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate the time above the MIC of the free drug concentration as a percentage of the dosing interval (fT>MIC). The monotherapy MIC50s and MIC90s were 32 and 256 mg/liter for meropenem and 64 and 512 mg/liter for fosfomycin, respectively. Antimicrobial combination increased bacterial susceptibility to 1/4 the MIC50s and to 1/8 to 1/16 the MIC90s of monotherapy. The antimicrobial combination demonstrated a synergistic effect for at least two-thirds of the isolates. In combination therapy, fosfomycin regimens of 6 g q6h and 8 g q8h as a 3-h infusion against the MIC50 and MIC90 had better chances of achieving ≥90% probability of target attainment (PTA) of 70% fT>MIC. Meropenem regimens of 1.5 g q6h and 2 g q8h in prolonged infusion can achieve close to 90% PTA of 40% fT>MIC for MIC50 but not MIC90 The significant reduction in the MIC values and the achievement of appropriate PTA demonstrated that regimens containing fosfomycin with meropenem can be effective against KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , Thienamycins/pharmacology , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Meropenem , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Monte Carlo Method , beta-Lactamases/genetics
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(11): 1374-1380, 2016 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27156198

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: First detected in the United States in 1996, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) has spread internationally among gram-negative bacteria, especially K pneumoniae. These microorganisms can cause serious infections in hospitalized patients, and there are few therapeutic options, culminating in increased mortality. The objective of this study was to describe the occurrence of outbreaks that were caused by KPC-producing K pneumoniae, emphasizing the interventions that were implemented to contain the outbreaks. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Literatura Latino Americana em Ciências da Saúde databases were searched for articles that were published between 2001 and 2012 according to the recommendations of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. RESULTS: Of the 586 studies identified, 13 were selected for the final sample. Most studies showed that the containment of KPC outbreaks is possible in hospital settings through several actions, particularly use of surveillance cultures and the establishment of contact precautions. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that limiting the cross-transmission of these and other KPC-producing bacteria is possible in a hospital setting. However, such isolates need to be detected early with the aid of culture surveillance and contained early using appropriate actions immediately to prevent an outbreak.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Global Health , Humans , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella Infections/prevention & control , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification
7.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 47(5): 380-5, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27068675

ABSTRACT

In this study, the activity of meropenem (MEM), fosfomycin (FOF) and polymyxin B (PMB), alone and in combination, was analysed. In addition, optimisation of the pharmacodynamic index of MEM and FOF against six isolates of OXA-23-producing Acinetobacter baumannii (including three resistant to PMB) that were not clonally related was assessed. Antimicrobial combinations were evaluated by chequerboard analysis and were considered synergistic when the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was ≤0.5. Pharmacodynamic analyses of the MEM and FOF dosing schemes were performed by Monte Carlo simulation. The target pharmacodynamic index (%ƒT>MIC) for MEM and FOF was ≥40% and ≥70%, respectively, and a probability of target attainment (PTA) ≥0.9 was considered adequate. Among the PMB-resistant isolates, combinations of PMB+MEM and PMB+FOF+MEM showed the highest synergistic activity (FICI ≤0.125); isolates that were previously PMB-resistant were included in the susceptible category using CLSI interpretive criteria. Pharmacodynamic evaluation found that for a FOF minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤16µg/mL, treatment both by bolus dosing and prolonged infusion achieved adequate PTA, whilst for MIC=32µg/mL only infusion achieved adequate PTA. For a MEM MIC of 4µg/mL, only the bolus treatment scheme with 1.5g q6h and the infusion schemes with 1.0g q8h, 1.5g q6h and 2.0g q8h achieved PTA ≥0.9. Results of antimicrobial and pharmacodynamic analyses can assist in treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. However, in vivo clinical studies are essential to evaluate the true role of these compounds, including intravenous antimicrobial FOF therapy.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Drug Synergism , Fosfomycin/pharmacology , Polymyxin B/pharmacology , Thienamycins/pharmacology , Acinetobacter Infections/drug therapy , Acinetobacter Infections/microbiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Fosfomycin/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Meropenem , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Monte Carlo Method , Polymyxin B/pharmacokinetics , Thienamycins/pharmacokinetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...