ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine reference urodynamic values for preoperative urodynamic studies in women undergoing surgery for pure or predominant stress urinary incontinence (SUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred fifty-five women with pure or predominant SUI were enrolled in a multicenter surgical trial and were randomized to undergo a Burch or autologous fascia sling procedure as part of the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN) Stress Incontinence Surgical Treatment Efficacy Trial (SISTEr). Preoperative free uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure flow studies were performed in all women using a standardized research protocol and standardized urodynamic interpretation guidelines. We define the normal range of urodynamic values in this population as the values that encompass 95% of the results. RESULTS: In 655 women undergoing filling cystometry in the standing position, baseline vesical and abdominal pressures were between 12 and 60 cm H(2)O. The upper limit of detrusor pressure increase during bladder filling to maximum cystometric capacity was 16 cm H(2)O. Ten percent of women who qualified for stress incontinence surgery with a positive cough stress test on physical exam did not demonstrate urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) and less than 10% of subjects in this study demonstrated detrusor overactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Results from a large cohort of women with SUI are now available for quantitative plausibility assessments or as reference values when interpreting urodynamic studies.
Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Urological/standards , Preoperative Care/standards , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/diagnosis , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Urodynamics , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Pressure , Quality Control , Reference Values , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/physiopathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common diagnosis in older men with lower urinary tract symptoms. However, these symptoms also can occur with interstitial cystitis. We determine whether the potassium sensitivity test is useful for distinguishing BPH from possible intersitial cystitis in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. We also test the hypothesis that patients with these symptoms who have a positive test will have urodynamic findings consistent with the diagnosis of interstitial cystitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The potassium sensitivity test was performed in 526 (95%) males and 25 (5%) females with lower urinary tract symptoms undergoing urodynamic testing. Urodynamic parameters in the positive and negative potassium sensitivity test groups were compared. % RESULTS: Of the patients 16% (89 of 551) had a positive potassium sensitivity test. Compared with patients who had a negative test, those who had a positive test were younger (61 versus 64 years, p = 0.03), had urgency at significantly lower volumes (108 versus 182 cc, p <0.0001), lower bladder capacity (343 versus 436 cc, p <0.0001) and lower post-void residual (49 versus 95 cc, respectively, p <0.001). Urodynamic parameters in the 24% (6 of 25) of women who had a positive potassium sensitivity test were similar to those in men who also had a positive test. CONCLUSIONS: Urodynamic findings in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms who have a positive potassium sensitivity test are significantly different from those in patients who have a negative test, and are similar to those findings characteristic of interstitial cystitis. Interstitial cystitis should be considered in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms who have a positive test. The potassium sensitivity and urodynamic tests may be a useful combination for screening men with lower urinary tract symptoms to identify those symptoms that may be due to interstitial cystitis versus BPH.
Subject(s)
Cystitis, Interstitial/diagnosis , Potassium , Prostatic Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction/diagnosis , Urodynamics , Administration, Intravesical , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Probability , Sensitivity and Specificity , Urologic Diseases/diagnosisABSTRACT
This article represents an overview of the evaluation and diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence. Lower urinary tract anatomy in women is reviewed with particular attention to the salient features contributing to stress incontinence. Also discussed is the relevance of the distinction between anatomic incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency in the classification of stress urinary incontinence. Various diagnostic techniques are described with emphasis on the importance of urodynamic evaluation in complex cases.
