Subtelomeric chromosome aberrations: still a lot to learn.

Subtelomeric chromosome aberrations: still a lot to learn.Cryptic subtelomeric chromosome aberrations are a significant cause of mental retardation (MR). More than 4000 patients have been investigated, and the mean overall prevalence of subtelomeric rearrangements has been found to be 5.2%. In order to contribute to knowledge on the clinical presentation of subtelomeric rearrangements, we retrospectively studied patients with unexplained MR who had been evaluated for subtelomeric abnormalities by different fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques. Hundred and two patients had an unexplained combination of MR with dysmorphism, congenital anomalies, and/or a positive family history and were investigated by total subtelomeric (TS) FISH (89/102), or by total painting (TP) in an obligate carrier in the case of familial MR (13/102). In 59 additional patients, a sequence-specific FISH was performed on clinical indication. In the 102 patients studied by TS or TP, six pathogenic aberrations (5.9%) were found in addition to one polymorphism. In total, eight clinically significant subtelomeric aberrations were found in the 161 index patients; four of these eight aberrations were familial. We report on the clinical presentation of all patients with an aberration and review the relevant literature. Factors complicating the interpretation of subtelomeric rearrangements are discussed, such as the occurrence of variants, clinical variability, and limited knowledge of the phenotype.

Sonographic genital ambiguity in a fetus due to a mosaic 45,X/46,X,idic(Y)(qter-p11.32::p11.32-qter) karyotype.

Nowadays, improved ultrasound techniques enable the detection of more subtle congenital abnormalities at an earlier stage of fetal development. Current cytogenetic techniques can characterize a chromosomal abnormality in greater detail. These advancements in both diagnostic possibilities have helped to answer many questions but have also created new issues and dilemmas in counselling. This is illustrated by this case report of a 35-year-old woman, who presented at the end of the second trimester of her first pregnancy. Sonographic examination indicated an abnormal external genital in a male fetus. A differential diagnosis of hypospadia was made. During follow-up, an amniocentesis was performed, and this showed a 45,X/46,X,idic(Y)(qter-p11.32::p11.32-qter) karyotype as the cause of the sonographic findings. Cytogenetic characterization of the isodicentric Y chromosome and pre- and post-natal findings in the child are reported. Cases with a similar karyotype reported in the literature are reviewed.

Mosaic trisomy (8)(p22 --> pter) in a fetus caused by a supernumerary marker chromosome without alphoid sequences.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterise a marker chromosome in cultured amniocytes of a fetus with a mos 47,XX,+mar[3]/46,XX[14] karyotype. METHODS: The indication for prenatal cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniocytes was advanced maternal age. Classic banding techniques (GTG- and C-banding) were performed. Microdissection combined with reverse painting was used to disclose the exact origin of the marker; the result was confirmed by chromosome painting and FISH with band-specific probes. RESULTS: Analysis of GTG-banded chromosomes showed a small marker chromosome in 3 of the 17 colonies analysed. Subsequently, C-banding showed no alphoid sequences, suggesting the presence of a neocentromere. The parent's karyotypes were normal. After normal ultrasound findings, the parents decided to continue the pregnancy. Chromosome analysis in peripheral blood after birth demonstrated that the marker chromosome was present in 50% of the lymphocytes. Using microFISH, the marker was further characterised and appeared to be derived from chromosome region (8)(p22 --> pter). CONCLUSION: Accurate identification of the marker chromosome was very important for prenatal counselling. Combining the results of GTG- and C-banding analysis with the results of the (micro)FISH, we concluded that the patient's karyotype is: mos 47,XX,+mar.rev ish der(8)(p22 --> pter)[50]/46,XX[50].

Familial insertion (3;5)(q25.3;q22.1q31.3) with deletion or duplication of chromosome region 5q22.1-5q31.3 in ten unbalanced carriers.

We report on the clinical and cytogenetic data of a large family with an unbalanced insertion translocation (3;5)(q25.3;q22.1q31.3). Analysis of GTG-banded chromosomes demonstrated that unbalanced inheritance of a parental insertion translocation caused either a partial deletion or duplication 5q in this family. The derivative chromosomes were characterized further using microdissection and FISH with band-specific probes. The clinical picture of the proband with a partial deletion of chromosome 5 was characterized by moderate psychomotor retardation, mild facial dysmorphism, cleft palate, and single transverse crease. The family members with a partial duplication of chromosome 5 were borderline intelligent, had mild facial dysmorphism, a cardiac anomaly, and a high-pitched voice. The unbalanced carriers were compared with patients reported in the literature with a duplication or deletion of chromosome region 5q22.1 --> 5q31.3.

A patient with a de novo 15q24q26.1 interstitial deletion, developmental delay, mild dysmorphism, and very blue irises.

We report on a patient with a de novo 15q24q26.1 interstitial deletion. She presented with developmental delay, behavioral characteristics, and mild dysmorphism with very blue irises. We review the limited literature of interstitial 15q deletions. There was no distinct phenotypic overlap between these two cases in literature and the present patient. Additional reports are necessary in order to establish a possible recognizable deletion 15q24q26.1 phenotype.

Characterization of a chromosome 8-derived minute marker chromosome using microdissection and FISH in a boy with growth retardation.

In a 9-year-old boy referred because of growth retardation, chromosome analysis showed the presence of a minute marker chromosome in 75% of the metaphases examined. The application of microdissection in combination with fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated that the marker was derived from the centromere region of chromosome 8, the karyotype being: mos 47,XY,+mar.ish der(8)(D8Z1+)[75]/46,XY[25]. The clinical and cytogenetical findings are compared with cases previously reported in the literature.