Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 46(9): 790-799, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28869287

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection appears to be more common than previously thought. HEV seroprevalence in patients on maintenance haemodialysis (HD) is unclear with a range from 0% to 44%. In addition, risk factors of transmission of HEV in patients on haemodialysis are unknown. AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of HEV seroprevalence in HD patients compared with controls. METHODS: A systematic search of several databases identified all observational studies with comparative arms. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the methodological quality. A random-effects model was used for pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of positive anti-HEV IgG in both groups. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed with appropriate tests. RESULTS: We identified 31 studies from 17 countries between 1994 and 2016. Sixteen studies were judged to have adequate quality and 15 to have moderate limitations. HEV infection was more prevalent in patients on haemodialysis compared with controls (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.79-3.40, I2 = 75.2%, P < .01). We conducted several subgroup analyses without difference in results. Egger regression test did not suggest publication bias (P = .83). Specific risk factors of HEV transmission in patients on haemodialysis were not clearly identified. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis E virus infection is more prevalent in patients on haemodialysis compared with non-haemodialysis control groups. Further studies are needed to determine risk factors of acquisition, impact on health, and risk for chronic HEV especially among those patients going to receive organ transplantation.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis E/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Renal Dialysis , Hepatitis E/epidemiology , Hepatitis E virus/immunology , Humans , Prevalence , Seroepidemiologic Studies
2.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 28(10): 997-9, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11753559

ABSTRACT

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) results in considerable morbidity and mortality. No therapy has been shown to be uniformly effective. Several studies have highlighted the pivotal role of endothelial injury and the hemostatic system in the pathogenesis of HVOD. Charcoal hemofiltration has been shown to be effective for adsorbing circulating bilirubin and other protein-bound toxins and for supporting patients in hepatic failure. We describe two adult patients with severe, biopsy-proven HVOD (peak bilirubin levels, more than 50 mg/dl in both cases) after HSCT who were successfully treated with charcoal hemofiltration after other treatments failed (including defibrotide in one patient). Both patients were heavily treated before they underwent either autologous (melphalan and total body irradiation conditioning) or allogeneic (cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation conditioning) HSCT. Additional studies are warranted to confirm this preliminary observation and investigate the mechanism of action.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hemofiltration/methods , Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/therapy , Adult , Bilirubin/blood , Charcoal , Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
4.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 76(1): 67-74, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11155415

ABSTRACT

Acute renal failure (ARF) affects almost all medical specialties. Its occurrence seems to be increasing in hospitalized patients. A structured approach to the evaluation and management of ARF would facilitate rapid diagnosis and treatment in most patients. Appreciation for the multiple drugs that affect renal function is especially important. Exclusion of urinary outflow obstruction and administration of therapies that improve renal perfusion should be given top priority with respect to managing ARF. Dialytic intervention for ARF is required when otherwise irreversible pathophysiologic derangements of electrolyte homeostasis, fluid balance, and uremic solute control are imminent. This article provides a brief review and update on the clinical evaluation and management of ARF.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , Kidney Diseases/complications , Kidney Transplantation , Postoperative Complications , Renal Dialysis , Vascular Diseases/complications
5.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 75(11): 1141-7, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11075743

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate survival and renal recovery after dialysis in patients with acute renal failure with use of synthetic membranes compared with substituted cellulose membranes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied survival and recovery of renal function of 66 patients with acute renal failure who required intermittent hemodialysis. Patients were randomized to exclusive treatment with either cellulose acetate (CA) or polysulfone (PS) hemodialysis membranes. Additionally, markers of biocompatibility (complement, leukocyte counts, cytokine concentration) were measured at initiation and 1 hour after initiation of dialysis among 10 patients equally distributed between the CA and PS groups. RESULTS: The cohorts were indistinguishable with respect to age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, percentage in the intensive care unit (ICU), and adequacy of dialysis. Survival (76% CA, 73% PS; P=.78) and recovery of renal function at 30 days (58% CA, 39% PS; P=.14) were not statistically different in the 2 groups. Among 26 CA patients and 27 PS patients treated in the ICU, survival was not statistically different (73% CA, 67% PS; P=.61); however, the proportion of patients recovering renal function suggested a benefit favoring CA membranes (65% CA, 37% PS; P=.04). Additionally, markers of biocompatibility were not significantly different between groups among the 10 patients equally distributed between the CA and PS groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall clinical outcomes among patients with acute renal failure treated with CA hemodialysis membranes and those treated with PS membranes were not significantly different. The observed advantage favoring renal recovery among this ICU population treated with CA hemodialysis membranes warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Cellulose/analogs & derivatives , Membranes, Artificial , Polymers , Renal Dialysis , Sulfones , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Aged , Female , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis
6.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 36(3): E21, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10977814

ABSTRACT

Lithium intoxication is an important complication of its frequent use and narrow therapeutic index. Intermittent hemodialysis has been the treatment of choice when emergent extracorporeal lithium clearance is indicated, but postdialysis rebound elevations in lithium concentration with recurrent toxicity have been documented. We report a case of intentional acute on chronic lithium intoxication in which continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration was successfully used. This modality offers the advantage of slow sustained removal of lithium without hemodynamic instability or rebound elevations in lithium concentration.


Subject(s)
Antimanic Agents/poisoning , Hemofiltration/methods , Lithium Carbonate/poisoning , Antimanic Agents/blood , Drug Overdose/therapy , Female , Humans , Lithium Carbonate/blood , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...