Predictive value of arm circumference (AC) and arm muscle circumference (AMC) with cardiovascular risk in healthy and diabetic males.

OBJECTIVE: The predictive value of body simplified indices needs to be evaluated properly for cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to assess and compare the relative relationship of arm circumference (AC), arm muscle circumference (AMC), body mass index (BMI), and waist-hip ratio (WHR) with Ultra-Sensitive C-Reactive Protein (US-CRP) in healthy male subjects and with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed the study at the department of Physiology, College of Medicine & King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It was a cross-sectional study with 93 healthy male subjects and 112 type 2 diabetic male patients who underwent body composition analysis by BIA and fasting venous blood samples were collected. US-CRP and body composition were determined for all subjects. RESULTS: US-CRP is correlated positively with AC (0.378) and BMI (0.394) more than AMC (0.282) and WHR (0.253) which have lower correlation both in control and DM group. BCM has the lowest correlation with US-CRP (0.105). The association between US-CRP and AC, AMC, Body Fat Percent (BFP), and body fat mass (BFM) are statistically significant except for BFP in DM group. In control group, AC is noticed to be a better predictor for US-CRP, with area under curve (AUC) 64.2% (p=0.019), WHR with AUC 72.6% (p<0.001), and BMI with AUC 65.4% (p=0.011) but AMC is not a good predictor in control group with AUC 57.5% (p=0.213). In DM group, AC is noticed to be a better predictor for US-CRP, with AUC 71.5% (p<0.001), WHR with AUC 67.4% (p=0.004), BMI with AUC 70.9% (p=0.001), and AMC with AUC 65.2% (p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Simplified muscle mass body indices like AC and AMC have significant predictive value for assessing cardiovascular risk in both healthy population and patients with T2DM. Therefore, AC could be used as a future predictor for cardiovascular disease in healthy and DM patients. Further investigations are needed to confirm its applicability.

Knowledge, attitude and practices of schoolteachers toward epilepsy and students with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate and evaluate teachers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward students with epilepsy and to determine the association between selected demographic factors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was approved by the ethical committee of King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted at the department of physiology, King Saud University, from October 2020 until October 2021. The data was collected through anonymous online self-administered 44-item questionnaires. The sampling technique used was Snowball sampling from ten randomly selected schools in Riyadh. RESULTS: The total sample size was 456 participants. The mean age of the respondents was 41.5 ± 8.52, and a male to female ratio of 1.4:1. The mean years of experience of the respondents is 16.14 ± 8.85. Almost all teachers knew that epilepsy is a neurological disorder (97.8%). However, females were more likely to know the cause of epilepsy (p=0.003). The majority of public-school teachers (80.2%) thought that epileptic students have normal intelligence (p=0.004). A considerable proportion of public-school teachers (82.8%) do not mind having a student with epilepsy in their classes (p=0.012). The vast majority of schoolteachers (95.4%) have not had any training on how to deal with an epileptic student during a seizure. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that schoolteachers have very good knowledge about epilepsy but poor practice towards it. Well-directed training programs are needed to qualify teachers in providing first aid to epileptic students during seizures.