[Comorbidity, anemia and response to erythropoiesis stimulating agents in chronic hemodialysis]. / Relación entre comorbilidad, anemia y respuesta a derivados eritropoyéticos en pacientes incluidos en programa de hemodiálisis periódicas.

INTRODUCTION: Patients treated with haemodialysis have a high prevalence of co-morbidity that induces a elevate mortality risk. On the other hand, these patients have anaemia whose treatment is based in erythropoiesis stimulating agents. To date there are not enough studies to determine if co-morbidity alters erythropoietin response and the relationship between co-morbidity, response to treatment of anaemia and resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. OBJECTIVES: We have the following objectives: i) to study the prevalence of associated diseases in patients treated with haemodialysis in our Hospital Unit and to evaluate the co-morbidity Charlson Index, ii) to know the degree of anaemia control, dose and response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and iii) to determine the relationship with co-morbidity and anaemia treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective study in stable haemodialysis treated patients. We calculated the Charlson co-morbidity index adjusted to age and we analysed levels of haemoglobin in the 6 months before study, dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and its resistance index defined as doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents/weight (kg)/week/haemoglobin (g/dL). The different variables included in Charlson index were considered as independent variables and the index to repose to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a dependent variable, using bivariant and multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: We included 58 patients (31 males and 27 females), median age of 69.5 years (range 24-88), mean haemodialysis 83.7 months. Mean Charlson index was 7.4 +/- 2.8 (range 2-13). Comorbidity-age Charlson index was 2 in 3.4% of patients; 10.3% had 3 or 4 points; 43.2% between 5 and 7 and 43,1% 8 or more. Mean haemoglobin levels was 11,7+/-1,2 g/dL. Mean erythropoiesis-stimulating agents dose was 163.7+/-114.5 IU/kg/week and resistance index 14.1+/-9.7. Most of patients (57%) had a IRE value higher than 10. Fourteen patients (24%) had haemoglobin less than 11 g/dL, and 3 of them (5.1%) received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents more than 300 IU/kg/week. Nine subjects (15.5%) was treated with high dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (>300 IU/kg/week): 3 of them had Hb>or=11 g/dL and 6 had Hb<11 g/dL. We did not found that the intensity of Charlson index is related with the degree of anaemia control or response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. CONCLUSIONS: Although the co-morbidity index is high and the response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents is inadequate. In our study there is not relationship between these conditions.

[CA-P control in haemodialysis and K/DOQI guidelines]. / Control del metabolismo calcio-fósforo en hemodiálisis y su adecuación a las guías K/DOQI 2003.

BACKGROUND: The publication in 2003 of the K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Bone Metabolism and Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease recommended targets levels for serum iPTH, Ca, P, and CaxP product. However, many patients do not achieved these target ranges. It is necessary to known the percentage of patients out of range in order to prevent the development of bone disease and to reduce mortality and morbidity. OBJECTIVES: To know the degree of control of Ca-P metabolism in haemodialysis patients in our haemodilalysis facilities and the achievement of target levels recommended by K/DOQI Guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have retrospectively investigated in 190 prevalent haemodialysis patients (males 58.2%, ratio M/F 1.4, mean age 70 years, range 17-87 years, at least 3 months in haemodialysis) the serum levels of Ca, albumin-corrected serum Ca, P, CaxP product and iPTH in all analitycal determinations performed in 2004. In each patient we have obtained the average (and median) of these serum markers. Cut-off levels were carried out following the recommendations of the K/DOQI Guidelines. RESULTS: The average of serum Ca and albumin-corrected serum Ca is normal (means +/- SD = 8.9 +/- 0.6 mg/dL and 9.2 +/- 0.7 mg/dL, respectively); however, 53.7% has normal values, 9.1% hypocalcemia and 37.1% hypercalcemia. The average of serum P is also normal (mean +/- SD = 5.0 +/- 1.3 mg/dL); however, only 57.2% has normal values, and 11.7% has hypophosphoremia and the remaining 31, 1% hyperphosphoremia. The CaxP product is normal (mean +/- SD = 46.3 +/- 13.3 mg2/mL2), 4.9% with low values and 23.4% with high values. The median of serum iPTH is 253 pg/mL, but only 31.1% of them have normal values, 25.1% low range values and 43.7% has hyperparathyroidism; 9.3% with iPTH higher than 800 pg/mL. The percentage of patients with hyperphosphoremia is higher in the group with iPTH higher than 300 pg/mL (23.3% vs. 40%, chi2, p= 0.006). In patients with PTHi in normal range, 3.6% have low CaxP product and the remaining 17.8% high CaxP product. Overall, only 25% of patients falls within recommended ranges for all indicators of mineral metabolism and 17% has all serum markers outside these recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of control of mineral metabolism in haemodyalisis patients if clearly insufficient and a large percentage of them do not achieved the recommended serum targets recommended by K/DOQI Guidelines. This groups of patients are exposed to a increased risk for oseous and cardiovascular morbimortality. The analysis of adequacy must be performed with percentage of patients out of range in order to apply new therapeutical strategies.

Calcificación coronaria en paciente en hemodiálisis / No disponible

No disponible