Are routine, daily chest radiographs (CXR) necessary following (VATS and RATS) lobectomies?

Background: Consensus guidelines regarding the amount and necessity of post-operative imaging in thoracic surgery are lacking. The efficacy of daily chest radiographs (CXR) following video-assisted (VATS) and robotic-assisted (RATS) thoracoscopic surgery in directing management has not been previously studied. We hypothesize that abnormal clinical findings, rather than abnormal imaging findings, better predict post-operative complications in patients undergoing VATS/RATS lobectomies. Methods: A retrospective review of VATS and RATS lobectomy patients were performed at a tertiary referral center from 1/1/2019-12/31/2021. Demographics, hospital course, and imaging were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, Chi-Square test, Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Our outcomes were post-operative complications requiring a procedure and extended length of stay (LOS) (>2 days post-operatively). Results: Out of 362 VATS/RATS lobectomy patients, 15 patients had post-operative complications requiring a procedure. Almost all patients who required a procedure had abnormal clinical signs and symptoms (14/15; p < 0.001) while 70 % had expected post-operative day (POD) one CXR findings (11/15; p = 0.463). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated clinical signs and symptoms independently predicted procedural requirement (odds ratio [OR] = 48, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]:8.5-267) while abnormal POD one imaging did not. For extended LOS, a positive smoking history (OR = 4.4, 95 % CI:1.4-14.1), number of CXRs (OR = 2.4, 95 % CI:1.8-3.2) and thoracostomy tubes (OR = 5.3, 95 % CI:1.0-27.3) were independent predictors while clinical signs and symptoms was not. Conclusion: Abnormal clinical findings may guide management more predictably than abnormal CXRs after VATS/RATS. Routine CXR in the post-operative setting may be unnecessary in those without clinical signs or symptoms. Key message: There are no consensus guidelines regarding the efficacy of routine, post-operative diagnostic studies after major thoracic lobar resections. The presence of abnormal signs or symptoms after minimally invasive lobectomies may better predict those who will require additional procedures better than the presence of abnormal routine, post-operative chest radiographs.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine computed tomography angiography (CTA) for lower extremity penetrating trauma.

BACKGROUND: Routine evaluation with CTA for patients with isolated lower extremity penetrating trauma and normal ankle-brachial-indices (ABI) remains controversial. While prior literature has found normal ABI's (≥0.9) and a normal clinical examination to be adequate for safe discharge, there remains concern for missed injuries which could lead to delayed surgical intervention and unnecessary morbidity. Our hypothesis was that routine CTA after isolated lower extremity penetrating trauma with normal ABIs and clinical examination is not cost-effective. METHODS: We performed a decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of obtaining a CTA routinely compared to clinical observation and ABI evaluation in hemodynamically normal patients with isolated penetrating lower extremity trauma. Our base case was a patient that sustained penetrating lower extremity trauma with normal ABIs that received a CTA in the trauma bay. Costs, probability, and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were generated from published literature. RESULTS: Clinical evaluation only (no CTA) was cost-effective with a cost of $2056.13 and 0.98 QALYs gained compared to routine CTA which had increased costs of $7449.91 and lower QALYs 0.92. Using one-way sensitivity analysis, routine CTA does not become the cost-effective strategy until the cost of a missed injury reaches $210,075.83. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with isolated, penetrating lower extremity trauma with normal ABIs and clinical examination do not warrant routine CTA as there is no benefit with increased costs.

Differences in outcomes by race/ethnicity after thoracic surgery in a large integrated health system.

Background: Disparities exist throughout surgery. We aimed to assess for racial/ethnic disparities among outcomes in a large thoracic surgery patient population. Methods: We reviewed all thoracic surgery patients treated at our integrated health system from January 1, 2016-December 31, 2020. Post-operative outcomes including length of stay (LOS), 30-day return to the emergency department (30d-ED), 30-day readmission, 30- and 90-day outpatient appointments, and 30- and 90-day mortality were compared by race/ethnicity. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Our multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, surgery type, neighborhood deprivation index, insurance, and home region. Results: Of 2730 included patients, 59.4 % were non-Hispanic White, 15.0 % were Asian, 11.9 % were Hispanic, 9.6 % were Black, and 4.1 % were Other. Median (Q1-Q3) LOS (in hours) was shortest among non-Hispanic White (37.3 (29.2-76.1)) and Other (36.5 (29.3-75.4)) patients followed by Hispanic (46.8 (29.9-78.1)) patients with Asian (51.3 (30.7-81.9)) and Black (53.7 (30.6-101.6)) patients experiencing the longest LOS (p < 0.01). 30d-ED rates were highest among Hispanic patients (21.3 %), followed by Black (19.2 %), non-Hispanic White (18.1 %), Asian (13.4 %), and Other (8.0 %) patients (p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, Hispanic ethnicity (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.43 (95 % CI 1.03-1.97)) and Medicaid insurance (OR 2.37 (95 % CI 1.48-3.81)) were associated with higher 30d-ED rates. No racial/ethnic disparities were found among other outcomes. Conclusions: Despite parity across multiple surgical outcomes, disparities remain related to patient encounters within our system. Health systems must track such disparities in addition to standard clinical outcomes. Key message: While our large integrated health system has been able to demonstrate parity across many major surgical outcomes among our thoracic surgery patients, race/ethnicity disparities persist including in the number of post-operative return trips to the emergency department. Tracking outcome disparities to a granular level such as return visits to the emergency department and number of follow up appointments is critical as health systems strive to achieve equitable care.

The impact of minimally-invasive esophagectomy operative duration on post-operative outcomes.

Background: Esophagectomy, an esophageal cancer treatment mainstay, is a highly morbid procedure. Prolonged operative time, only partially predetermined by case complexity, may be uniquely harmful to minimally-invasive esophagectomy (MIE) patients for numerous reasons, including anastomotic leak, tenuous conduit perfusion and protracted single-lung ventilation, but the impact is unknown. This multi-center retrospective cohort study sought to characterize the relationship between MIE operative time and post-operative outcomes. Methods: We abstracted multi-center data on esophageal cancer patients who underwent MIE from 2010 to 2021. Predictor variables included age, sex, comorbidities, body mass index, prior cardiothoracic surgery, stage, and neoadjuvant therapy. Outcomes included complications, readmissions, and mortality. Association analysis evaluated the relationship between predictor variables and operative time. Multivariate logistic regression characterized the influence of potential predictor variables and operative time on post-operative outcomes. Subgroup analysis evaluated the association between MIE >4 h vs. ≤4 h and complications, readmissions and survival. Results: For the 297 esophageal cancer patients who underwent MIE between 2010 and 2021, the median operative duration was 4.8 h [IQR: 3.7-6.3]. For patients with anastomotic leak (5.1%) and 1-year mortality, operative duration was elevated above the median at 6.3 h [IQR: 4.8-8.6], p = 0.008) and 5.3 h [IQR: 4.4-6.8], p = 0.04), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression, each additional hour of operative time increased the odds of anastomotic leak and 1-year mortality by 39% and 19%, respectively. Conclusions: Esophageal cancer is a poor prognosis disease, even with optimal treatment. Operative efficiency, a modifiable surgical variable, may be an important target to improve MIE patient outcomes.

A clinical review of spontaneous pneumomediastinum.

Primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum is a rare, often benign and self-limited condition defined by air within the mediastinum. However, correctly distinguishing primary spontaneous pneumomediastinum from secondary causes, especially esophageal perforation, remains a diagnostic challenge. There is significant debate regarding the balance of completing a thorough but not overly invasive and costly diagnostic workup. This clinical review aims to gather the limited data regarding spontaneous pneumomediastinum management from case series and retrospective cohort studies, and presents an evaluation algorithm and treatment plan stratified by clinical history. Understanding specifically if the patient presents with coughing versus forceful vomiting is critical to help elucidate the etiology and guide management of pneumomediastinum. Patients who present with forceful vomiting or retching should be considered with higher degree of suspicion for secondary causes of pneumomediastinum, specifically esophageal perforation. However, especially in children, aggressive diagnostic workup is not warranted in every case. After ruling out other etiologies of pneumomediastinum, spontaneous pneumomediastinum can be commonly treated with symptomatic management without the aggressive use of antibiotics or diet restriction. Hospital length of stay may also be minimized on a case-by-case basis. Overall, recurrence of spontaneous pneumomediastinum is rare and outpatient follow up may be safely limited to those at highest risk of recurrence.

Early Abnormal Vital Signs Predict Poor Outcomes in Normotensive Patients Following Penetrating Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Because trauma patients in class II shock (blood loss of 15%-30% of total blood volume) arrive normotensive, this makes the identification of shock and subsequent prognostication of outcomes challenging. Our aim was to identify early predictive factors associated with worse outcomes in normotensive patients following penetrating trauma. We hypothesize that abnormalities in initial vital signs portend worse outcomes in normotensive patients following penetrating trauma. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed from 2006 to 2021 using our trauma database and included trauma patients presenting with penetrating trauma with initial normotensive blood pressures (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg). We compared those with a narrow pulse pressure (NPP ≤25% of systolic blood pressure), tachycardia (heart rate ≥100 beats per minute), and elevated shock index (SI ≥ 0.8) to those without. Outcomes included mortality, intensive care unit admission, and ventilator use. Chi-squared, Mann-Whitney tests, and regression analyses were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 7618 patients with penetrating injuries and normotension on initial trauma bay assessment. On univariate analysis, NPP, tachycardia, and elevated SI were associated with increases in mortality compared to those without. On multivariable logistic regression, only NPP and tachycardia were independently associated with mortality. Tachycardia and an elevated SI were both independently associated with intensive care unit admission. Only an elevated SI had an independent association with ventilator requirements, while an NPP and tachycardia did not. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate trauma bay NPP and tachycardia are independently associated with mortality and adverse outcomes and may provide an opportunity for improved prognostication in normotensive patients following penetrating trauma.

Multiple Casualty Incidents at a Level I Trauma Center: A 15-year Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Limited evidence regarding multiple casualty outcomes exists. Given resource strain with increasing patient load, we hypothesized that patients involved in a multiple casualty incident have worse outcomes compared to standard trauma patients. METHODS: Multiple casualty victims from 2006 to 2021 at our institution were identified; admission data and trauma outcomes were then compared to standard trauma patients. Chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed for categorical and non-normal continuous data, respectively. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations with mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: We identified 39,924 patients, of which 612 were multiple casualty patients (1.5%). Multiple casualty involvement was associated with younger age (29 y versus 44 y, P < 0.001) and higher rates of penetrating trauma (26.1% versus 21.4%; P < 0.001). Multiple casualty involvement was associated with higher injury severity score (ISS) (11.6 versus 7.9, P < 0.001), mortality (2.4% versus 1.5% P < 0.005), and ICU admission (17% versus 13%, P < 0.005). On logistic regression analysis, age, ISS, shock index, presence of the COVID-19 pandemic, and mechanism all independently predicted mortality (P ≤ 0.003), while multiple casualty involvement did not (P = 0.302). CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple casualty incidents are associated with patient factors that increase hospital resource strain, when controlling for age, ISS, shock index, presence of the COVID-19 pandemic, and trauma mechanism, involvement in multiple casualty incident was not independently associated with ICU admission or mortality. Improved understanding of the impact of high-volume trauma may allow us to improve our care of this at-risk population.

Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Curative Intent Esophageal Cancer Resection Patients: Real-World Experience within an Integrated Health System.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant immunotherapy has been shown in clinical trials to prolong the survival of patients with esophageal cancer. We report our initial experience with immunotherapy within an integrated health system. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed reviewing patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy at our institution between 2017 and 2021. The immunotherapy cohort was assessed for completion of treatment, adverse effects, and disease progression, with emphasis on patients who received surgery in 2021 and their eligibility to receive nivolumab. RESULTS: There were 39 patients who received immunotherapy and 137 patients who did not. In logistic regression, immunotherapy was not found to have a statistically significant impact on 1-year overall survival after adjusting for age and receipt of adjuvant chemoradiation. Only seven patients out of 39 who received immunotherapy successfully completed treatment (18%), with the majority failing therapy due to disease progression or side effects. Of the 17 patients eligible for nivolumab, 13 patients received it (76.4%), and three patients completed a full course of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite promising findings of adjuvant immunotherapy improving the survival of patients with esophageal cancer, real-life practice varies greatly from clinical trials. We found that the majority of patients were unable to complete immunotherapy regimens with no improvement in overall 1-year survival.

Case report on the role of aggressive palliative surgery in lung NUT carcinoma after induction chemoimmunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: NUT (nuclear protein in testis) carcinoma of the lung is an aggressive, poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma that has a poor prognosis. Currently, there are no recommended guidelines with limited literature regarding the management of primary NUT carcinoma of the lung. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old male presented with 2 weeks of intractable chest pain and shortness of breath and was found to have Stage IV pleural NUT carcinoma. After 2 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, the patient's symptoms persisted with worsening functional status. Palliative surgery was performed via an extrapleural pneumonectomy with significant improvement in symptoms and activities of daily living. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: With no current treatment guidelines, we demonstrate the benefit of surgical resection of advanced pleural NUT carcinoma to improve quality of life. Prognosis is poor with a median survival around 7 months and 3 months with an associated mass. The patient presented pre-operatively with intractable pleuritic chest pain and shortness of breath, limiting activities of daily living that persisted despite chemoimmunotherapy. Our surgical goal was to improve the patient's respiratory status and mitigate pain symptoms via extensive surgical debulking. The patient was able to achieve a higher quality of life and survived longer than the median average, passing away 1 year after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The management of NUT carcinoma of the lung remains challenging. The role of surgical resection for palliation in advanced tumors has not been previously described and may provide improved quality of life in carefully selected patients.

Reduced opioid utilization and post-operative pain in Asian vs. Caucasian populations after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy with liposomal bupivacaine-based intercostal nerve blockade.

BACKGROUND: Regional analgesia, such as intercostal nerve blockade (INB), is a viable modality for postoperative pain control in thoracic surgery patients. Asian patients have historically been underrepresented in studies of pain responses and pain medication requirements based on race. In this study, we examined the postoperative opioid medications used by Asian and Caucasian patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy who received different bupivacaine-based INB. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing VATS lobectomy who received standard bupivacaine (SB), liposomal bupivacaine (LB), or liposomal bupivacaine mixed with standard bupivacaine (MIX). Length of stay (LOS), postoperative pain scores, postoperative opioid use (in intravenous morphine equivalents) were evaluated. The Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables; Student's t-test for normally distributed variables; and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for non-normally distributed variables. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess opioid use in Asians compared to Caucasians. RESULTS: Of the 239 patients in the cohort, 212 received LB or MIX and 27 received SB. In the LB/MIX group, 48 (22.6%) were Asian and 164 (77.4%) were Caucasian. In the SB group, 7 (25.9%) were Asian and 20 (74.1%) were Caucasian. There were no differences in height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) between the SB and LB/MIX groups, but there was a significant difference in weight and BMI between Asian and Caucasian patients. The median LOS was comparable between the SB and LB/MIX groups. The average 24-hour postoperative pain score in the LB/MIX group was 2.5, and 2.0 and 2.7 in the Asian and Caucasian subgroups, respectively (P<0.01). The median opioid use in the LB/MIX group was 27.2 mg, and 16.9 and 31.1 mg in the Asian and Caucasian subgroups, respectively (P<0.01). On multivariable linear regression analysis adjusting for sex, age, BMI, and bupivacaine type, we found Asians used 25.5 mg less opioids compared to Caucasians (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: INB with LB or liposomal-standard bupivacaine mix resulted in statistically significant decreased postoperative pain scores and opioid use in Asians compared to Caucasians. There was no difference in LOS between the LB/MIX and SB groups.