Airway and Feeding Outcomes in Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Three Management Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains regarding optimal management of Pierre Robin sequence (PRS). The goal of this study was to compare airway and feeding outcomes in infants with PRS who underwent surgical intervention, specifically mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) or tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), or who had conservative management (CM) without surgery. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated for PRS at a pediatric academic medical center, with at least one year follow-up, were included. Patients who underwent tracheostomy as an index procedure were excluded. Patients were divided into those who underwent MDO, TLA or CM. Feeding status and data from initial and follow-up polysomnograms were collected. Comparisons between groups were made using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Mann-Whitney pairwise comparison with a Bonferroni correction, when appropriate. RESULTS: 67 neonates were included. 19 underwent TLA, 29 underwent MDO and 19 underwent CM. The proportions of syndromic patients were similar between groups. Patients undergoing CM had the lowest baseline AHI (9.1), but there were no significant differences between TLA (20.1) and MDO (25.4). At follow-up, the three groups had similar mean AHI (MDO 1.3, TLA 4.2, CM 4.5). A similar proportion of patients achieved AHI 5 or less (TLA 89.5%, MDO 96.6%, CM 84.2%). At one year, there were no significant differences in weight percentiles or in risk of failure-to-thrive between groups. One patient from the TLA group required a tracheostomy. CONCLUSION: The three treatment modalities achieved high airway and feeding success rates. All three modalities should have a place in the armamentarium of the craniofacial surgeon.

Patient Outcomes After Horizontal Cleavage Tear Repair: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical outcomes and survivorship of meniscal horizontal cleavage tear (HCT) repairs with hopes of guiding future treatment decisions. METHODS: Standard systematic review methodology was used. A comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted on June 1, 2019. The inclusion criteria were articles that were published in English, involved human subjects, and reported on at least 1 outcome after repair of HCTs. The exclusion criteria included technique guides and reviews, studies without full text available, and studies with HCT outcomes not separated from other repair groups. Effect heterogeneity was determined using the I2 measure. Forest plots were created in addition to a random-effects model to show the results. RESULTS: The systematic review yielded 19 studies evaluating 289 knees in a total of 273 patients. At most recent follow-up, there was a high probability of return to sport (93.1% [67 of 72]). Overall, 74% of patients (67 of 90) were symptom free at last follow-up, and 80% expressed satisfaction with their overall result (80 of 100). The most frequently reported subjective outcome was the Lysholm score, which improved from a preoperative study range of 48 to 79 (I2 = 20.7%, P = .283) to a postoperative study range of 56 to 99 (I2 = 49%, P = .081). The next most commonly reported was the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, which improved from a preoperative study range of 16 to 49 (I2 = 47.7%, P = .125) to a postoperative study range of 72 to 95 (I2 = 0%, P = .660). An overall 11.7% reported risk of reoperation was found, with most cases involving revision meniscectomy. Rates of complications beyond fixation failure were overall very low, with infrequent reports of septic arthritis and transitory dysesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: The short- to intermediate-term results of repair of HCTs are comparable to prior studies. Survivorship is comparable to repairs of other types of meniscal tears with high rates of return to sport and low complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.