PPH-01 versus PPH-03 to perform STARR for the treatment of hemorrhoids associated with large internal rectal prolapse: a prospective multicenter randomized trial.

PURPOSE: This multicenter randomized study was designed to compare the clinical and functional results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) performed with 2 staplers (PPH-01 vs. PPH-03) in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease associated with a large internal rectal prolapse. METHODS: From a total of 937 patients, referred for hemorrhoidal disease in the 20 centers involved in the study, 425 (45.3%) with prolapsed hemorrhoids associated with a large internal rectal prolapse were randomized to undergo STARR with PPH-01 or PPH-03. Postoperative evaluation was made at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The incidence of bleeding at the stapled line was significantly lower in the PPH-03 group than in the PPH-01 group (58/207 [28.0%] vs. 145/201 [72.1%]; P < .0001); the mean number of hemostatic stitches was significantly higher in the PPH-01 than in the PPH-03 group (3.2 ± 0.1 vs. 1.8 ± 0.8; P < .0001). The mean operative time was 25.1 ± 11.5 minutes in the PPH-03 group and 38.1 ± 15.7 minutes in the PPH-01 group (P < .0001). No major complications occurred in either of the groups. At 12-month follow-up, the success rate in the 2 groups was 94.5% in the PPH01 group and 94.2% in the PPH03 group. CONCLUSION: STARR performed for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease associated with a large rectal prolapse is a safe and effective procedure. The use of the PPH-03 stapler instead of the PPH-01 guarantees a statistically significant reduction of intraoperative bleeding and a significant decrease of the operative time.

[Preservative surgery of the kidney for haemorrhagic angiomyolipoma: a report of two cases]. / Chirurgia conservativa del parenchima renale per angiomiolipoma emorragico: due casi clinici.

Renal angiomyolipomas are very rare benign tumours (3% of renal tumours) that may present as isolated tumours or tumours associated with other pathologies, particularly tuberous sclerosis (40%), neurofibro-matosis, or Sturge-Webers disease. Clinically, renal angiomyolipoma is asymptomatic until the tumour becomes larger than 4 cm, causing urinary symptoms such as pain, infection, and microhaematuria. Rarely, in cases of large hypervascularised lesions, the clinical picture at onset may consist in spontaneous haemorrhage due to vessel rupture. The therapy consists in non-operative treatments for small tumours (< 4 cm) and surgical treatment, probably preservative, for larger tumours. In complicated haemorrhagic cases, an angiographic approach or surgical treatments, possibly conservative, are possible, offering the opportunity for further elective treatment. On the basis of case reports starting with haemorrhage and treated in urgency and of a review of the literature, we conclude that it is possible and mandatory to perform emergency preservative treatments of the kidney with an angiographic or surgical approach, and to ensure haemostasis. Treatment of the disease can be postponed when clinical and environmental conditions are better. Furthermore, we stress the need, once the clinical urgency/emergency is over, to submit the patient to suitable examinations to detect possible associated pathologies (tuberous sclerosis, neurofibromatosis, Sturge-Webers disease) in other parts of the body.