Sources of Health Information and Their Impacts on Medical Knowledge Perception Among the Saudi Arabian Population: Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Having a reliable source for health information is vital to build a strong foundation of knowledge, especially with the current revolution of the internet and social media, which raises many concerns regarding harmful effects on the health of the public. However, there are no studies on how the Saudi Arabian population seeks health information. Details about the most used and trusted sources of health information among the public will help health authorities and public awareness accounts on social media to effectively disseminate health information. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the types of sources accessed by the Saudi Arabian population while seeking health information, as well as their level of trust in the sources and to assess the impact of these sources on their perception of medical knowledge and health decision-making. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to meet the objectives. The study population included both men and women who were aged 16 years or more and visited primary care clinics at King Khalid University Hospital. Four hundred and thirteen participants were sampled using the simple random method, and a self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, USA). RESULTS: A total of 413 participants were included in this study, and of these, 99 (24.0%) were males and 206 (49.9%) had a bachelor's degree. Doctors were chosen as the first source of information by 87.6% (283/323) of the participants, and they were completely trusted by most of the population (326/411, 79.3%). The second most commonly used source was pharmacists (112/194, 57.7%), and they were partially trusted by 41.4% (159/384) of the participants. Internet searches, social media, and traditional medicine were not prioritized by most of the participants as the first or second source of health information. The majority of the participants did not trust information obtained from social media, and WhatsApp was the most untrusted source. Almost half of the respondents (197/413, 47.7%) acknowledged that various sources of information can often help them understand their health problems. However, the majority disagreed on substituting a doctor's prescription with information obtained from the internet or a friend or relative. CONCLUSIONS: Although physicians were preferred and highly trusted, internet sources appeared to impact the medical knowledge of the population. The population still preferred to use internet search to obtain health information prior to a doctor's visit.

Clinical spectrum of neurofibromatosis type 1 among children in a tertiary care center.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the clinical and neuroradiological features of neurofibromatosis type 1 and the risk of malignancy in a pediatric age group. METHODS: This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, for the patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 who were seen and had follow up from January 2000 to January 2019. RESULTS: A total of 50 children were included. Approximately 90% of patients presented with cafe-au-lait macules, and 34% had skin-fold freckling. Moreover, 42% of the participants had a first-degree relative with neurofibromatosis type 1, and about a quarter presented with associated epilepsy. About 90% of the neuroradiological features were consistent with those of neurofibromatosis type 1. About 52% of the patients had one or multiple types of tumors, and 34% presented with optic pathway glioma. CONCLUSION: This study described clinical spectrum of neurofibromatosis type 1 among children. It showed also a higher percentage of tumors than previous studies.