Ovarian stimulation does not influence the uterine immune environment in healthy infertile women.

RESEARCH QUESTION: There is some controversy regarding the impact of ovarian stimulation on immune cells in women undergoing IVF. The study's aim was to determine whether ovarian stimulation affected immune uterine cells in healthy women undergoing IVF. DESIGN: This prospective cohort study included 28 patients undergoing IVF and 47 healthy oocyte donors. Endometrial biopsies were taken in a natural cycle and after ovarian stimulation. All participants had a normal karyotype, pelvic ultrasound and cervical cytology results and thyroid-stimulating hormone concentration, as well as normal glucose and insulin concentrations and inherited and acquired thrombophilia test results. Screening tests including human papillomavirus were normal. Immune cells were analysed using three techniques: fluorescence-activated cell sorting, immunohistochemistry and gene expression. A human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-C tetramer was used as an 'artificial embryo'. The expression of genes including those for tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin-10 (IL-10) was analysed. RESULTS: A comparison was made of the percentage and gene expression of CD56brightCD16- uterine natural killer (uNK), CD56dimCD16+ natural killer cells, CD56-CD16+ natural killer cells and TregCD25+CD4+FoxP3+ cells, uNK binding to the HLA-C tetramer, and TNF-α and IL-10 expression. No between- or within-group differences were observed in natural versus ovarian stimulation cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian stimulation does not affect the uterine immune cell population or HLA-C binding in healthy women undergoing ovarian stimulation. Further studies are underway to find out if different responses might be seen in women with previous autoimmune disorders.

Maternal KIR haplotype influences live birth rate after double embryo transfer in IVF cycles in patients with recurrent miscarriages and implantation failure.

STUDY QUESTION: In patients with recurrent miscarriages (RM) or recurrent implantation failure (RIF), does the maternal killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) haplotype have an impact on live birth rates per cycle after embryo transfer with the patient's own or donated oocytes? SUMMARY ANSWER: After double embryo transfer (DET) in patients with the maternal KIR AA haplotype, a significantly increased early miscarriage rate was observed when the patient's own oocytes were used, and a significantly decreased live birth rate per cycle after embryo transfer was observed when donated oocytes were used. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Interactions between fetal HLA-C and maternal KIR influence placentation during human pregnancy. There is an increased risk of RM, pre-eclampsia or fetal growth restriction in mothers with the KIR AA haplotype when the fetus has more HLA-C2 genes than the mother. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: Between 2010 and 2014, we performed a retrospective study that included 291 women, with RM or RIF, who had a total of 1304 assisted reproductive cycles. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rates per cycle after single or DET, categorized by the origin of the oocytes and the presence of maternal KIR haplotypes, were studied. KIR haplotype regions were defined by the presence of the following KIR genes: Cen-A/2DL3; Tel-A/3DL1 and 2DS4; Cen-B/2DL2 and 2DS2; as well as Tel-B/2DS1 and 3DS1. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Higher rates of early miscarriage per cycle after DET with the patient's own oocytes in mothers with the KIR AA haplotype (22.8%) followed by those with the KIR AB haplotype (16.7%) compared with mothers with the KIR BB haplotype (11.1%) were observed (P = 0.03). Significantly decreased live birth rates per cycle were observed after DET of donated oocytes in mothers with the KIR AA haplotype (7.5%) compared with those with the KIR AB (26.4%) and KIR BB (21.5%) haplotypes (P = 0.006). No statistically significant differences were observed for pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rates per cycle among those with maternal KIR AA, AB and BB haplotypes after single embryo transfer (SET) with the patient's own or donated oocytes. The large number of cases studied strengthens the results and provides sufficient power to the statistical analysis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: During the IVF procedure, DET induces the expression of more than one paternal HLA-C and the oocyte-derived maternal HLA-C in the oocyte-donation cycles probably behaves like paternal HLA-C. Because this was a retrospective study, we did not have data about the HLA-C of the parent, donor, chorionic villi, or infant, which is a limitation because we cannot show differences according to paternal or oocyte donor HLA-C1 and HLA-C2. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These new insights could have an impact on the selection of SET in patients with RM or RIF, and a KIR AA haplotype. Also, it may help in oocyte and/or sperm donor selection by HLA-C in patients with RM or RIF and a KIR AA haplotype. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No funding was received for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Outcomes of splenectomy in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID): a survey of 45 patients.

Splenectomy has been used in patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID), mainly in the context of refractory autoimmune cytopenia and suspected lymphoma, but there are understandable concerns about the potential of compounding an existing immunodeficiency. With increasing use of rituximab as an alternative treatment for refractory autoimmune cytopenia, the role of splenectomy in CVID needs to be re-examined. This retrospective study provides the largest cohesive data set to date describing the outcome of splenectomy in 45 CVID patients in the past 40 years. Splenectomy proved to be an effective long-term treatment in 75% of CVID patients with autoimmune cytopenia, even in some cases when rituximab had failed. Splenectomy does not worsen mortality in CVID and adequate immunoglobulin replacement therapy appears to play a protective role in overwhelming post-splenectomy infections. Future trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of rituximab and splenectomy are needed to provide clearer guidance on the second-line management of autoimmune cytopenia in CVID.

Sublingual therapeutic immunization with a polyvalent bacterial preparation in patients with recurrent respiratory infections: immunomodulatory effect on antigen-specific memory CD4+ T cells and impact on clinical outcome.

Recurrent respiratory tract infections (RRTIs) are common clinical conditions in individuals with alterations of the immune function. A prospective open pilot study in a cohort of patients with RRTIs has been performed to assess whether sublingual immunization with a polyvalent bacterial vaccine could exert an immunomodulatory effect on the antigen-specific immunological responses and have an impact on the clinical outcome. Seventeen patients with RRTIs were recruited. An oral polyvalent bacterial preparation (Bactek®) was administered to all patients daily for 6 months. Immunological assessment was performed at baseline and at the end of immunization. Immunological measurements included: T cell-specific proliferations of CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ to Bactek® antigens, total immunoglobulin levels, antibodies to pneumococcal polysaccharide and tetanus toxoid and B, T and natural killer (NK) cell subsets. There was a significant increase in the proliferative capacity of CD3+CD4+ T cells specific to Bactek® antigens at month 6 in comparison to baseline (P < 0·0001). A significant increase in total CD3+ T cells was also observed (P < 0·05). No significant differences were observed between baseline and month 6 in levels of total immunoglobulins, specific antibodies and B, T or NK cell subsets. A significant reduction in the patient's rate of RRTIs was observed compared with 1 year prior to initiation of therapy (P < 0·0001). The results demonstrate that long-term administration of a sublingual polyvalent bacterial preparation in patients with RRTIs exerts an immune stimulating effect on CD4+ T helper cell responses to bacterial antigens which could be associated with clinical benefit.

[Introduction to biological drugs]. / Introducción a los fármacos biológicos.

Biological therapies have revolutionized the treatment of chronic systemic diseases in which the immune system disorders form a part of the disease mechanism. In these diseases, the patients follow different drug treatments for long periods of time that causes serious adverse reactions and often obtain unsatisfactory efficacy results. Due to the research conducted in the last 10 years, biological drugs have been introduced into the treatment that are aimed against specific targets, such as inflammatory and immunopathological responses that give rise to tissue injury. The new biological therapies have improved the currently available treatments due to greater efficacy, fast action and greater tolerability. The present work aims to provide a global and up-dated view on the biological agents used most in the usual clinical practice and their importance in the management of the chronic immunologically based inflammatory diseases.

Introducción a los fármacos biológicos / Introduction to biological drugs

Las terapias biológicas han revolucionado el tratamiento de las patologías crónicas sistémicas en las que las alteraciones del sistema inmunológico forman parte de los mecanismos de la enfermedad. En estas enfermedades los pacientes siguen diversos tratamientos farmacológicos durante largo tiempo, lo que produce reacciones adversas serias y, en muchas ocasiones, resultados de eficacia poco satisfactorios. Debido a las investigaciones de los últimos 10 años se han introducido en la clínica fármacos biológicos que están dirigidos contra dianas específicas, como las respuestas inflamatorias e inmunopatológicas que dan lugar a la lesión tisular. Las nuevas terapias biológicas han mejorado los tratamientos actualmente disponibles debido a su mayor eficacia, rapidez de acción y mejor tolerancia. El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo presentar una visión global y actualizada de los agentes biológicos más empleados en la práctica clínica habitual y su importancia en el manejo de las patologías inflamatorias crónicas de base inmunológica (AU)

Biological therapies have revolutionized the treatment of chronic systemic diseases in which the immune system disorders form a part of the disease mechanism. In these diseases, the patients follow different drug treatments for long periods of time that causes serious adverse reactions and often obtain unsatisfactory efficacy results. Due to the research conducted in the last 10 years, biological drugs have been introduced into the treatment that are aimed against specific targets, such as inflammatory and immunopathological responses that give rise to tissue injury. The new biological therapies have improved the currently available treatments due to greater efficacy, fast action and greater tolerability. The present work aims to provide a global and up-dated view on the biological agents used most in the usual clinical practice and their importance in the management of the chronic immunologically based inflammatory diseases (AU)