Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prev Vet Med ; 226: 106188, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38513566

ABSTRACT

Rabies, a globally distributed and highly lethal zoonotic neglected tropical disease, has a significant impact in South America. In Ecuador, animal rabies cases are primarily linked to livestock, and hematophagous bats play a crucial role in disease transmission. This study aims to identify temporal trends, spatial patterns, and risk factors for animal rabies in Ecuador between 2014 and 2019. Epidemiological survey reports from the official Animal Rabies Surveillance Program of the Phyto and Zoosanitary Regulation and Control Agency of Ecuador (AGROCALIDAD) were used. The Animal Rabies Surveillance Program from AGROCALIDAD consists of an official passive surveillance program that receives reports from farmers or individuals (both trained or untrained) who have observed animals with neurological clinical signs and lesions compatible with bat bites, or who have seen or captured bats on their farms or houses. Once this report is made, AGROCALIDAD personnel is sent for field inspection, having to confirm the suspicion of rabies based on farm conditions and compatibility of signs. AGROCALIDAD personnel collect samples from all suspicious animals, which are further processed and analyzed using the Direct Fluorescent Antibody (DFA) test for rabies confirmatory diagnosis. In this case, study data comprised 846 bovine farms (with intra-farm sample sizes ranging from 1 to 16 samples) located in different ecoregions of Ecuador; out of these, 397 (46.93%) farms tested positive for animal rabies, revealing six statistically significant spatial clusters. Among these clusters, three high-risk areas were identified in the southeast of Ecuador. Seasonality was confirmed by the Ljung-Box test for both the number of cases (p < 0.001) and the positivity rate (p < 0.001). The Pacific Coastal lowlands and Sierra regions showed a lower risk of positivity compared to Amazonia (OR = 0.529; 95% CI = 0.318 - 0.883; p = 0.015 and OR = 0.633; 95% CI = 0.410 - 0.977; p = 0.039, respectively). The breeding of non-bovine animal species demonstrated a lower risk of positivity to animal rabies when compared to bovine (OR = 0.145; 95% CI = 0.062 - 0.339; p < 0.001). Similarly, older animals exhibited a lower risk (OR = 0.974; 95% CI = 0.967 - 0.981; p < 0.001). Rainfall during the rainy season was also found to decrease the risk of positivity to animal rabies (OR = 0.996; 95% CI = 0.995 - 0.998; p < 0.001). This study underscores the significance of strengthening the national surveillance program for the prevention and control of animal rabies in Ecuador and other countries facing similar epidemiological, social, and geographical circumstances.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Chiroptera , Rabies virus , Rabies , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Chiroptera/physiology , Ecuador/epidemiology , Livestock , Rabies/epidemiology , Rabies/veterinary , Rabies/prevention & control , Risk Factors
2.
Animals (Basel) ; 9(10)2019 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31569506

ABSTRACT

The domestic cat (Felis catus) has become a worldwide threat to wildlife. The potential impact of owned cats on wildlife in Chile has not been documented at a large scale. The purpose of this study was to investigate the number and type of prey that owned cats bring back in Chile and its relation with responsible ownership practices. An online survey was distributed to 5216 households that included questions about the type of pet, responsible ownership practices, and in the case of cats, the type of prey they brought home. Descriptive statistics as well as univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were applied. The results showed that 94.3% of respondents had a pet, and from these, 49.9% had at least one cat. A total of 84.1% of owners reported that their cats had brought back prey. Birds were the most common type of prey, followed by mammals and insects. Not being registered with a microchip, not having a litter box, living in a house with access to a garden, not having a hiding place for the cats, and having free access to the outdoors significantly increased the odds of cats bringing back prey. Body condition score or providing ad libitum food to cats did not have an effect on bringing prey.

3.
Animals (Basel) ; 9(6)2019 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31248126

ABSTRACT

A ten-year database of food preference tests (n = 1021; period 2007-2017) was used to explore the feeding behavior of domestic cats. Principal component (PC) analysis and linear regression between food nutrients and preferences (for the most preferred diet of each test; Diet A) were performed. Intake and preference for Diet A were analyzed by intrinsic cats' variables and climate season. The PC1 (calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and ash), PC2 (lipids and ether extract) and PC4 (crude fiber; CF) had borderline significance (p < 0.06; ß = -1.42, ß = -1.56, and ß = 2.68, respectively). Ash and CF contents presented negative correlations with food preference (rho = -0.269, p = 0.031; rho = -0.338, p = 0.006, respectively), and Ca had borderline significance and negative correlation with food preference (rho = -0.241, p = 0.054). Body weight and sex influenced the intake of Diet A, being lower for females (ß = 11.758; p = 0.014) and heaviest cats (ß = -5.490; p < 0.001). However, only body weight affected food preferences, where the heaviest cats had greater preferences for Diet A. Hot season decreased food intake (ß = -2,117; p = 0.032), mostly in females (rho = -3.537; p = 0.002). Males had greater preferences for Diet A during hot seasons (ß = 10.216; p = 0.023) and females presented similar preferences throughout the year (p = 0.950). Mineral contents, body weight and sex affected food intake and preferences of cats under the influence of climate season, probably explained by adaptive changes in food detection.

4.
Animals (Basel) ; 9(5)2019 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31064159

ABSTRACT

A ten-year food preference database (2007-2017) was used to relate food selection in dogs to the nutritional components of diets by doing a principal component analysis (PCA) and a linear regression between components obtained and dogs' preferences. Intake and preference of preferred diets were analyzed by dogs' sex, breed, age, body weight, and the season of the year (hot or cold). The fourth component after PCA presented a relation with food preferences (OR = -2.699, p = 0.026), showing negative correlations with crude fiber (rho = -0.196; P = 0.038) and dry matter (rho = -0.184; p = 0.049). Weight (OR = -1.35; p < 0.001), breed, both Boxer (OR = 10.62; p = 0.003) and Labrador Retriever (OR = 26.30; p < 0.001), and season (hot season) (OR = -5.27; p < 0.001) all influenced animals' intake. Boxers presented a lower food preference compared to the other breeds (OR = -44.3; p < 0.001), while animals' weight influenced preferences only in Boxers (OR = 2.02; p < 0.001). Finally, age and sex did not affect dogs' preference or intake of preferred diets. Thus dry matter and fiber content have a negative impact on dogs' food choices. Dogs' weight, breed, and season affected food intake, but only breed affected dogs' preferences, which is probably explained by adaptive changes in the detection, metabolization, and learning of nutritive food cues.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...