Impact of drinking water supplementation of a blend of peppermint, coneflower (Echinacea purpurea), thyme, propolis, and prebiotic on performance, serum constituents, and immunocompetence of broiler chickens.

Essential oils, extracts, their components, and other non-antibiotic beneficial additives are becoming increasingly popular as naturally occurring immunomodulatory agents. A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of a blend (hereafter refers to as ImmunoMax (IMX)) of peppermint, coneflower, thyme, propolis, and prebiotic on performance, immune response, hematological indices, and serum biochemistry of broiler chickens. A total of 300 day-old broiler male chicks were randomly assigned to 4 treatments: control (A) (not treated), 0.25 mL/L (B), 0.5 mL/L (C), and 1 mL/L (D) supplementing drinking water with IMX on alternate days, starting at day 21. The results demonstrated a higher body weight gain (BWG) and feed intake (FI) in groups B, C, and D (P < 0.05) with no significant difference in FCR. The results also revealed a superior immune response to NDV, IB, and IBD (P < 0.05), albeit no constant linear response. The largest portion of the heterophil, the smallest amount of the lymphocyte, and therefore the highest heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (H:L) were observed in the control group, while the lowest ratio belonged to groups B and C (P < 0.05). Hemoglobin content, hematocrit, total number of red blood cells (RBC), and white blood cells (WBC) were also affected by IMX, showing a significant rise compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Administering 0.25 mL/L of IMX resulted a higher thigh and breast yield as well as the smallest amount of abdominal fat (P < 0.05). The serum content of total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) was superior in groups receiving 0.25 and 0.5 mL/L of IMX; these treatments also yielded an inferior content of glucose (GLU), triglycerides (TG), cholesterol (CHOL), LDL, and VLDL, in addition to causing the highest content of HDL (P < 0.05). The results obtained in this study revealed the immunomodulatory efficacy of a standardized natural multidrug, IMX, thereby improving the performance and carcass yield of modern broiler chickens with the optimal dosages of 0.25 and 0.5 mL/L.

Research Note: Effect of corn silage and alfalfa meal as alternative induced molt methods to improving Salmonella Enteritidis resistance in laying hens.

This experiment was conducted to evaluate diets containing a high level of corn silage and alfalfa meal in inducing molt and reducing susceptibility to Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) colonization in laying hens. Thirty-two healthy hens were examined by cloacal swab samples to be free of Salmonella. Then they were weighed individually and distributed to 4 experimental groups containing 8 hens each, including Full-fed (control, FF); total feed withdrawal (positive control for molt induction, FW); 80% corn silage (CS) + 20% layer diet (CS80), and 80% alfalfa meal (AM) + 20% layer diet (AM80). The molting program was initiated at 71 wk of age. On d 4 of the experiment, all hens were inoculated with SE by oral gavage. All hens were first weighed at the ending molting period on d 10 and then euthanized by CO2 gas. The internal organs including the ovary, oviduct, liver, and spleen, were excised aseptically and weighed. Cloacal swab and feed samples at the beginning and organ samples (liver, ovary, spleen, and cecum) were collected from each hen at the end of the experiment and examined for SE colonies. Molted birds lost roughly 14 to 27%t of their body weight and had significantly lower organ weight and egg production compared to FF group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in the number of days to zero egg production between molted treatments. The SE positive organs did not significantly differ between CS80 and AM80 with FF treatment. Treatment CS80 had the lowest crop pH and differed substantially from treatment FW. In conclusion, results indicate that using corn silage and alfalfa meal, can improve resistance to salmonella Enteritidis during molt inducing compared to traditional feed withdrawal.