Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 50(6): 68-70, 01 nov. 2022. ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-211526

ABSTRACT

Temporary henna tattoos have become increasingly popular, particularly among children and teenagers. The word “henna” is of Persian origin, and it is prepared from the plant Lawsonia inermis belonging to the family Lythraceae. Concerning allergic reactions, natural henna paste is rarely responsible for contact dermatitis, which is more frequent if paraphenylenediamine (PPD) is added to the paste. The authors present a case of female child with erythematous exanthems that appeared after the application of black henna tattoo. A diagnosis of contact dermatitis to black henna tattoo was hypothesised. Epicutaneous tests were performed at the Immunoalergology Department of the Coimbra University Hospital using standard European battery and natural henna paste. The tests revealed positive reaction to PPD (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Child, Preschool , Coloring Agents/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Phenylenediamines/adverse effects , Tattooing/adverse effects
4.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 54(6): 265-276, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33944544

ABSTRACT

Summary: Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) is a procedure performed when no alternative drug is considered equally effective. The aim of our study is to describe the experience with RDD to cytostatics in patients being treated for gynaecological cancer in a tertiary hospital, over a period of 5 years. In this paper, we review 22 cases and 107 episodes of RDD; 86.3% of patients had advanced disease and the mortality rate at the time of data collection was 50.0%. RDD was performed on 81.8% patients for platinum, 13.6% for taxanes, and 4.5% for anthracyclines. The reintroduction of antineoplastic drugs in all patients with a previous history of immediate hypersensitivity reaction demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this procedure. There was serious complication (anaphylaxis) in only one case.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Neoplasms , Humans , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Tertiary Care Centers , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Taxoids/adverse effects , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Neoplasms/drug therapy
8.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 52(1): 23-34, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31287264

ABSTRACT

Summary: Background. Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal medical emergency. The frequency of hospital admissions for anaphylaxis seems to be increasing in the recent decades. Objective. Characterize the patients admitted for anaphylaxis to the adult emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital over a 10-year period, discriminating aetiologies, clinical features and therapy administered. Methods. Retrospective, descriptive and inferential study, evaluating age, sex, Manchester triage system, suspected allergen, site of allergen exposure, comorbidities, cofactors, clinical findings and symptoms, treatment and management. Patients admitted between January 2007 and December 2016 were included. Results. Forty-three patients were enrolled: 23 males, mean age 54.3 ± 16.2 years, n = 22 had history of allergic disease. Two patients were triaged as non-urgent. The most frequently suspected causes of anaphylaxis were: drugs (33%, n = 14), Hymenoptera venoms (23%, n = 10), foods (21%, n = 9) and iodinated contrast products (12%, n = 5). Adrenaline was used in 88% of the episodes (n = 38), 55% of which (n = 21) intramuscularly. Mortality was registered in one case. At discharge, adrenaline auto-injector was prescribed in 7% (n = 3) of the patients, and Allergy and Clinical Immunology consultation (ACIC) was requested in 65% of the episodes (n = 28). Statistically significant associations (p minor 0.05) were established: a, anaphylaxis to drugs associated with a low intramuscular adrenaline use and with frequent oxygen therapy; b, anaphylaxis to food associated with intramuscular adrenaline administration; c, anaphylaxis to Hymenoptera venom associated with male sex; and d, anaphylaxis to iodinated contrasts associated with referral to ACIC and with shock. All obese patients developed shock. Conclusions. Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening condition that requires early recognition. Although most patients received adrenaline, administration was not always performed by the recommended route and only a few patients were prescribed adrenaline auto-injector.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Adult , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Anaphylaxis/mortality , Animals , Arthropod Venoms/immunology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Female , Food , Humans , Hymenoptera , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Hypersensitivity/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Portugal/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...