Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 16: 1047-1056, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37089278

ABSTRACT

Estimation of the prevalence of chronic conditions is pivotal to effective healthcare planning and management. Therefore, our objective was to systemically review previous literature about the prevalence of chronic diseases among residents of Northern Borders Province (NBP) in Saudi Arabia. The electronic search has been done using scientific databases (PubMed, Ebsco, SciFinder, and Web of Science) and search engines up to September 2021. The following main key terms: chronic disease OR chronic conditions AND prevalence AND Northern Borders Province OR Northern Borders AND Saudi Arabia were applied. Other related terms with a more specific search were done with names of the main cities in the province and the most common diseases in Saudi Arabia. Duplicates were removed electronically by Endnote and manually. Extracted data were tabulated in the literature matrix. The risk of bias and quality of included studies were assessed using the "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology" (STROBE) checklist. Out of 63 observational studies that were assessed for eligibility, 21 observational studies were included to synthesize the evidence. These studies were conducted on Arar (n=16), Turaif (n=2), and Rafha (n=1), while the remaining were national studies in which NBP was one of the included regions (n=2). The most frequently studied diseases were diabetes (4 records), psychological diseases (4 records), and obesity (3 records). The most prevalent disease was gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), with an estimated prevalence of 61% among adults in Arar city. In conclusion, although some research is conducted about chronic diseases somewhere in NBP, further studies are needed to study chronic diseases using a representative sample of the whole NBP population.

2.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 21(5): 995-999, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32892665

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of metformin to reduce the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnant women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) from the US health-care payer perspective. METHODS: A decision tree was developed to simulate the progression of PCOS in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 pregnant women diagnosed with PCOS and two scenarios were tested. Normal glucose regulation without developing GDM, average cost-effectiveness ratios (ACER), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were the outcome measures assessed through pregnancy. Evidence from randomized clinical trials and other published literature were used to assess disease progression and its associated health-care costs. Sensitivity analyses that varied key model parameters were conducted. RESULTS: Management of PCOS with metformin was associated with lowest ACER ($669.78 per normal glucose regulation without GDM) as compared to 'no intervention' strategy. Metformin use is the most cost-effective strategy to manage PCOS during pregnancy with average cost savings of $7,593,372.97 and an average effect gain of 2271 of normal glucose regulation without GDM among pregnant women with PCOS. Sensitivity analyses determined that the results are robust. CONCLUSIONS: Management of PCOS during pregnancy may be a cost-effective strategy to reduce GDM risk and its associated complications.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/prevention & control , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Metformin/administration & dosage , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Adult , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Disease Progression , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/economics , Metformin/economics , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/economics , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors
3.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 167(1): 183-193, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28866828

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study assessed the association between the severity of diabetes complications using diabetes complications severity index (DCSI) and stage of breast cancer (BC) at diagnosis among elderly women with pre-existing diabetes and incident BC. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data, we identified women with incident BC during 2004-2011 and pre-existing diabetes (N = 7729). Chi-square tests were used to test for group differences in stage of BC at diagnosis. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the associations between the severity of diabetes complications and stage of BC at diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, women with a DCSI = 2 and a DCSI ≥ 3 were more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages as compared to those with no diabetes complications. In full adjusted association (after adding BC screening to the analysis model), the severity of diabetes complications was no longer an independent predictor of advanced stages at diagnosis. However, women with a DCSI = 2 were 26% more likely to be diagnosed at stage I (versus stage 0) of BC at diagnosis as compared to those without diabetes complications (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.53). CONCLUSION: The increased likelihood of having advanced-stage BC at diagnosis associated with severity of diabetes-related complications appears to be mediated by lower rates of breast cancer screening among elderly women with pre-existing diabetes complications. Therefore, reducing disparity in receiving breast cancer screening among elderly women with diabetes may reduce the risk of advanced-stage breast cancer diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Diabetes Complications/pathology , Female , Humans , Mammography , Mass Screening , Medicare , Neoplasm Staging , SEER Program , Severity of Illness Index , United States
4.
J Diabetes Complications ; 31(1): 267-272, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27751709

ABSTRACT

AIM: Conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the association between incident chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and either diabetes mellitus (DM) or hyperglycemia in patients with cancer. METHODS: Observational studies in cancer patients of any age receiving chemotherapy and having diabetes or hyperglycemia either during or before chemotherapy induction were included. Studies were retrieved by searching four databases (PubMed, EBSCO, ProQuest, and Cochrane) and cross-referencing. The metric for combining studies was the odds ratio (OR). Results were pooled using a random-effects model, while heterogeneity and inconsistency were assessed using the Q and I2 statistic, respectively. Potential small-study effects were assessed using the funnel plot. RESULTS: Ten studies met the criteria for inclusion. Overall, the odds of having CIN were 32% higher among cancer patients with either DM or hyperglycemia compared with those without DM or hyperglycemia (OR=1.32, 95% CI, 1.06-1.64). Statistically significant heterogeneity and inconsistency were found (Q=33.15, p<0.05, I2=72.9%). Funnel plot asymmetry reflecting potential small-study effects was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia may be associated with an increased risk for CIN among cancer patients. However, additional well-designed studies are needed before any final and definitive recommendations can be made.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Diabetes Complications/drug therapy , Hyperglycemia/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Diabetes Complications/blood , Humans , Hyperglycemia/prevention & control , Neoplasms/blood , Neoplasms/complications , Neutropenia/epidemiology , Reproducibility of Results , Risk
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 95(51): e5656, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28002335

ABSTRACT

Cancer screening tests are important tools to combat cancer-related morbidity and mortality. There is limited up-to-date research on spatial and temporal variations of colorectal and breast cancer screening in the United States.County-level data of cancer screening adherence rates were generated from 2008 to 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We performed the univariate local indicators for spatial analyses (LISA) for the geographic differences of screening adherence rate and the differential LISA for the change of screening adherence rate from 2008 to 2012.In the univariate LISA, low-to-low clusters were consistently identified in counties of New Mexico, Wyoming, and Mississippi (P < 0.05) for both screenings. In the differential LISA, we found low-to-low clusters in Indiana counties (P < 0.05) for mammography screening, which implied that counties with a below-average difference in mammography adherence were surrounded by counties of below-average difference in adherence rates. A high-to-high cluster was also identified in the southern Appalachian counties for mammography screening (P < 0.05). No obvious spatial pattern was found for the colorectal cancer screening adherence rate across the United States.We found low-to-low clusters over time in adherence to screening guidelines for both cancer types in New Mexico, Wyoming, and Mississippi, and clusters of potential decrease in adherence to mammography screening guideline in counties of Indiana. The study also showed improvement on mammography screening clustered in southern Appalachia. The methodology adopted in this study identified areas with clusters of consistent low adherence to screening and a decrease in adherence, which implies that further research and intervention is warranted.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Spatio-Temporal Analysis , United States/epidemiology
6.
Qual Life Res ; 25(6): 1517-25, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26590839

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous findings regarding depression treatment and its consequences on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of adults with diabetes were inconsistent and targeted certain groups of population. Therefore, there is a critical need to conduct a population-based study that focuses on a general population with diabetes and depression. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to examine the physical and mental HRQoL associated with depression treatment during the follow-up year. METHODS: We adopted a longitudinal design using multiple panels (2005-2011) of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to create a baseline year and follow-up year. We included adults with diabetes and depression. We categorized the baseline depression treatment into: (1) antidepressant use only; (2) psychotherapy with or without antidepressants; and (3) no treatment. HRQOL was measured using SF-12 version 2 physical component summary (PCS) and SF-12 mental component summary (MCS) scores during both baseline year and follow-up year. Ordinary least squares (OLS) were used to estimate the association between depression treatment and the HRQoL measures. The OLS regression controlled for predisposing, enabling, need, external environment factors, personal health practices, and baseline HRQoL measures. RESULTS: After controlling for all the independent variables and the baseline PCS, individuals who received psychotherapy with or without antidepressants had higher PCS scores as compared to those without any treatment for depression (beta = 1.28, p < 0.001). Individuals who reported using only antidepressants had lower PCS scores (beta = -0.54, p < 0.001) as compared to those without depression treatment. On the contrary, individuals who reported receiving psychotherapy with or without antidepressants had lower MCS scores as compared to those without depression treatment (beta = -1.43, p < 0.001). Those using only antidepressants had higher MCS scores as compared to those without depression treatment (beta = 0.56, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The associations between depression treatment and the HRQoL varied by the type of depression treatment and the component of the HRQoL measures.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depression/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Psychotherapy , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Aged , Depression/psychology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Diabetes Complications/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...