ABSTRACT
Older cancer patients are disproportionally affected by the Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. A higher rate of death among the elderly and the potential for long-term disability have led to fear of contracting the virus in these patients. This fear can, paradoxically, cause delay in diagnosis and treatment that may lead to a poor outcome that could have been prevented. Thus, physicians should devise a policy that both supports the needs of older patients during cancer treatment, and serves to help them overcome their fear so they seek out to cancer diagnosis and treatment early. A combination of telemedicine and a holistic approach, involving prayers for older cancer patients with a high level of spirituality, may improve vaccination rates as well as quality of life during treatment. Collaboration between health care workers, social workers, faith-based leaders, and cancer survivors may be crucial to achieve this goal. Social media may be an important component, providing a means of sending the positive message to older cancer patients that chronological age is not an impediment to treatment.
ABSTRACT
Guidelines on resource allocation, ethics, triage processes with admission and discharge criteria from critical care and palliative care units during the pandemia are here presented. The interdisciplinary and multi-society panel that prepared these guidelines represented by bioethicists and specialists linked to the end of life: clinicians, geriatricians, emergentologists, intensivists, and experts in palliative care and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The available information indicates that approximately 80% of people with COVID-19 will develop mild symptoms and will not require hospital care, while 15% will require intermediate or general room care, and the remaining 5% will require assistance in intensive care units. The need to think about justice and establish ethical criteria for allocation patients arise in conditions of exceeding available resources, such as outbreaks of diseases and pandemics, with transparency being the main criterion for allocation. These guides recommend general criteria for the allocation of resources relies on bioethical considerations, rooted in Human Rights and based on the value of the dignity of the human person and substantial principles such as solidarity, justice and equity. The guides are recommendations of general scope and their usefulness is to accompany and sustain the technical and scientific decisions made by the different specialists in the care of critically ill patients, but given the dynamic nature of the pandemic, a process of permanent revision and adaptation of recommendations must be ensured.
Se presentan las guías sobre ética de asignación de recursos, procesos de triaje con criterios de ingreso y egreso de unidades de cuidados críticos y atención paliativa durante la pandemia. El panel interdisciplinario y multisocietario que las preparó estuvo representado por bioeticistas y por especialistas vinculados al fin de la vida: clínicos, geriatras, emergentólogos, intensivistas, expertos en cuidados paliativos y en reanimación cardiopulmonar. La información disponible indica que aproximadamente 80% de las personas con COVID-19 desarrollarán síntomas leves y no requerirán asistencia hospitalaria, mientras que 15% precisará cuidados intermedios o en salas generales, y el 5% restante requerirá de asistencia en unidades de cuidados intensivos. La necesidad de pensar en justicia y establecer criterios éticos de asignación surgen en condiciones de superación de los recursos disponibles, como en brotes de enfermedades y pandemias, siendo la transparencia el principal criterio para la asignación. Estas guías recomiendan criterios generales de asignación de recursos en base a consideraciones bioéticas, enraizadas en los Derechos Humanos y sustentadas en el valor de la dignidad de la persona humana y principios sustanciales como la solidaridad, la justicia y la equidad. Las guías son recomendaciones de alcance general y su utilidad consiste en acompañar y sostener las decisiones técnicas y científicas que tomen los distintos especialistas en la atención del paciente crítico, pero dado el carácter dinámico de la pandemia, debe asegurarse un proceso de revisión y readaptación permanente de las recomendaciones.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Decision Making/ethics , Emergency Medical Services/ethics , Health Care Rationing/economics , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Triage/ethics , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Care/ethics , Critical Care/standards , Humans , Palliative Care , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Resource Allocation , SARS-CoV-2 , Societies, MedicalABSTRACT
Se presentan las guías sobre ética de asignación de recursos, procesos de triaje con criterios de ingreso y egreso de unidades de cuidados críticos y atención paliativa durante la pandemia. El panel interdisciplinario y multisocietario que las preparó estuvo representado por bioeticistas y por especialistas vinculados al fin de la vida: clínicos, geriatras, emergentólogos, intensivistas, expertos en cuidados paliativos y en reanimación cardiopulmonar. La información disponible indica que aproximadamente 80% de las personas con COVID-19 desarrollarán síntomas leves y no requerirán asistencia hospitalaria, mientras que 15% precisará cuidados intermedios o en salas generales, y el 5% restante requerirá de asistencia en unidades de cuidados intensivos. La necesidad de pensar en justicia y establecer criterios éticos de asignación surgen en condiciones de superación de los recursos disponibles, como en brotes de enfermedades y pandemias, siendo la transparencia el principal criterio para la asignación. Estas guías recomiendan criterios generales de asignación de recursos en base a consideraciones bioéticas, enraizadas en los Derechos Humanos y sustentadas en el valor de la dignidad de la persona humana y principios sustanciales como la solidaridad, la justicia y la equidad. Las guías son recomendaciones de alcance general y su utilidad consiste en acompañar y sostener las decisiones técnicas y científicas que tomen los distintos especialistas en la atención del paciente crítico, pero dado el carácter dinámico de la pandemia, debe asegurarse un proceso de revisión y readaptación permanente de las recomendaciones.
Guidelines on resource allocation, ethics, triage processes with admission and discharge criteria from critical care and palliative care units during the pandemia are here presented. The interdisciplinary and multi-society panel that prepared these guidelines represented by bioethicists and specialists linked to the end of life: clinicians, geriatricians, emergentologists, intensivists, and experts in palliative care and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The available information indicates that approximately 80% of people with COVID-19 will develop mild symptoms and will not require hospital care, while 15% will require intermediate or general room care, and the remaining 5% will require assistance in intensive care units. The need to think about justice and establish ethical criteria for allocation patients arise in conditions of exceeding available resources, such as outbreaks of diseases and pandemics, with transparency being the main criterion for allocation. These guides recommend general criteria for the allocation of resources relies on bioethical considerations, rooted in Human Rights and based on the value of the dignity of the human person and substantial principles such as solidarity, justice and equity. The guides are recommendations of general scope and their usefulness is to accompany and sustain the technical and scientific decisions made by the different specialists in the care of critically ill patients, but given the dynamic nature of the pandemic, a process of permanent revision and adaptation of recommendations must be ensured.
Subject(s)
Humans , Health Care Rationing/economics , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Decision Making/ethics , Emergency Medical Services/ethics , Pandemics , Palliative Care , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Triage/ethics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Critical Care/standards , Critical Care/ethics , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19ABSTRACT
La apendagitis epiploica primaria es una enfermedad relativamente infrecuente dentro de los diagnósticos diferenciales del abdomen agudo. Describimos las características clínicas y evolución de una serie de 73 casos de apendagitis epiploica primaria. Se realizó una búsqueda de imágenes ecográficas y tomográficas con diagnóstico de apendagitis en el sistema de información hospitalario electrónico del Hospital Alemán entre abril del 2007 y julio del 2013 y posteriormente se revisaron sus historias clínicas. Se incluyeron 73 casos; la edad promedio fue de 45 años (± 16), 54 (74%) eran varones. El motivo de consulta fue dolor abdominal: en fosa ilíaca izquierda en 65 (el 89% de los casos); en fosa ilíaca derecha en seis (8%) y en otras localizaciones en dos (3%). Se les realizó ecografía abdominal a 44 (60%), tomografía computarizada a 21 (29%), y ambos estudios a 8 (11%). En el 49% de los casos se solicitó interconsulta con el servicio de cirugía. Recibieron tratamiento con antibióticos 15 (21%) pacientes, de los cuales el 73% fue indicado por un médico clínico. Recibieron tratamiento ambulatorio con antiinflamatorios no esteroides 67 (92%); dos requirieron cirugía laparoscópica, dos internación y dos opiáceos. La apendagitis epiploica es infrecuente dentro de los diagnósticos diferenciales de abdomen agudo, pero es una entidad que no debe ser desconocida por los médicos para prevenir intervenciones innecesarias y el uso excesivo de antibióticos.
Primary epiploic appendagitis is a relatively rare disease in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen, nonetheless it is an entity that should not be ignored by physicians and surgeons in order to prevent unnecessary interventions and overuse of antibiotics. To substantiate this concept a search was conducted at the Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires between April 2007 and July 2013. The aim was clinical histories containing sonographic and tomographic images with diagnosis of omental appendagitis; and subsequently their electronic medical records were reviewed. The clinical features and outcome of a case series of 73 primary omental appendagitis were selected; the mean age was 45 years (± 16); 54 (74%) were men. Abdominal pain (left lower quadrant in 89% of cases) was the most common symptom. Abdominal ultrasound was performed on 44 (60%) of patients, computed tomography on 21 (29%), and both studies on 8 (11%) of cases in this series. In 49% of cases surgery consultation was requested. Fifteen patients (21%) were treated with antibiotics, 73% of them were prescribed by a clinician. Sixty seven patients (92%) were treated as outpatients with non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); two required laparoscopic surgery, two required hospitalization and two others were treated with opioids. Epiploic apendagitis is uncommon in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen, but is an entity that should not be ignored by physicians to prevent unnecessary interventions and overuse of antibiotics.
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Colitis/diagnosis , Abdomen, Acute/diagnosis , Abdomen, Acute/etiology , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Colitis/complications , Colitis/therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Laparoscopy , Rare Diseases , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Primary epiploic appendagitis is a relatively rare disease in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen, nonetheless it is an entity that should not be ignored by physicians and surgeons in order to prevent unnecessary interventions and overuse of antibiotics. To substantiate this concept a search was conducted at the Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires between April 2007 and July 2013. The aim was clinical histories containing sonographic and tomographic images with diagnosis of omental appendagitis; and subsequently their electronic medical records were reviewed. The clinical features and outcome of a case series of 73 primary omental appendagitis were selected; the mean age was 45 years (± 16); 54 (74%) were men. Abdominal pain (left lower quadrant in 89% of cases) was the most common symptom. Abdominal ultrasound was performed on 44 (60%) of patients, computed tomography on 21 (29%), and both studies on 8 (11%) of cases in this series. In 49% of cases surgery consultation was requested. Fifteen patients (21%) were treated with antibiotics, 73% of them were prescribed by a clinician. Sixty seven patients (92%) were treated as outpatients with non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); two required laparoscopic surgery, two required hospitalization and two others were treated with opioids. Epiploic apendagitis is uncommon in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen, but is an entity that should not be ignored by physicians to prevent unnecessary interventions and overuse of antibiotics.
Subject(s)
Colitis/diagnosis , Abdomen, Acute/diagnosis , Abdomen, Acute/etiology , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Colitis/complications , Colitis/therapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy , Male , Middle Aged , Rare Diseases , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Primary epiploic appendagitis is a relatively rare disease in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen, nonetheless it is an entity that should not be ignored by physicians and surgeons in order to prevent unnecessary interventions and overuse of antibiotics. To substantiate this concept a search was conducted at the Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires between April 2007 and July 2013. The aim was clinical histories containing sonographic and tomographic images with diagnosis of omental appendagitis; and subsequently their electronic medical records were reviewed. The clinical features and outcome of a case series of 73 primary omental appendagitis were selected; the mean age was 45 years (± 16); 54 (74
) were men. Abdominal pain (left lower quadrant in 89
of cases) was the most common symptom. Abdominal ultrasound was performed on 44 (60
) of patients, computed tomography on 21 (29
), and both studies on 8 (11
) of cases in this series. In 49
of cases surgery consultation was requested. Fifteen patients (21
) were treated with antibiotics, 73
of them were prescribed by a clinician. Sixty seven patients (92
) were treated as outpatients with non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); two required laparoscopic surgery, two required hospitalization and two others were treated with opioids. Epiploic apendagitis is uncommon in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen, but is an entity that should not be ignored by physicians to prevent unnecessary interventions and overuse of antibiotics.
