Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Am Surg ; 74(10): 917-20, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18942613

ABSTRACT

The highest degrees of accuracy have been demonstrated for CT scans using rectal contrast in diagnosing appendicitis. However, the administration of rectal contrast is associated with patient discomfort and rarely, rectosigmoid perforation (0.04%). Additionally, the commonly accepted negative appendectomy rate is around 16 per cent. We performed a retrospective review of radiology, operative, and pathology reports of consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy or CT examination for appendicitis during 2006. CT scans were performed without rectal contrast. The accuracy of each type of inpatient CT examination and negative appendectomy rates were determined. Two hundred and thirty-eight patients underwent appendectomy. One hundred and thirty-four appendectomy patients (56%) received a preoperative CT scan. The negative appendectomy rates were 6.3 per cent overall, 8.7 per cent without CT examination and 4.5 per cent with CT (P = 0.3). Two hundred and forty-five inpatient CT scans were performed for suspected appendicitis with a sensitivity of 90 per cent, specificity of 98 per cent, accuracy of 94 per cent, positive predictive value of 98 per cent, and negative predictive value of 91 per cent. CT scanning without rectal contrast is effective for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis making rectal contrast, with its attendant morbidity, unnecessary. The previously acceptable published negative appendectomy rate is higher than that found in current surgical practice likely due to preoperative CT scanning.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Appendectomy , Appendicitis/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Contraindications , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Errors , Enema , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Rectum , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
3.
Am Surg ; 73(5): 447-50, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17520996

ABSTRACT

Although guidelines exist for intracranial pressure (ICP)-guided treatment after head trauma, no conclusive data exist that support routine ICP monitoring. A retrospective case series was reviewed of all patients admitted to the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of blunt head trauma between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2004. None of the patients in the final analysis had ICP monitoring. Data collected included age, sex, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) at admission, injury severity score, disposition, and length of stay. One hundred thirty-one patients with a median age of 41 years were included. There were 104 men (79%). The median GCS at admission was 12. There were 22 deaths (17% mortality). Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified older age, higher injury severity score, and lower GCS to be predictors of death. The mortality rate was higher in patients with GCS < or =8 compared with GCS >8 (33% vs 8%, respectively; P < 0.001). Ten of 23 patients with a GCS of 3 died (43% mortality). The median time to death for patients with a GCS of 3 was 2 days. Although the Brain Trauma Foundation has published guidelines advocating routine ICP monitoring, no large randomized prospective studies are available to determine its effect on outcome. None of the patients in this study had ICP monitoring. Our overall survival rate of 83 per cent is relatively high. Patients with a low GCS and, specifically, those with a GCS of 3 may not benefit from ICP monitoring because of early and irreversible trauma. Variability in the use of ICP monitoring will remain until ICP monitoring can be conclusively proven to improve outcome.


Subject(s)
Head Injuries, Closed/mortality , Head Injuries, Closed/physiopathology , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Monitoring, Physiologic , Adult , Databases, Factual , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Head Injuries, Closed/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
4.
Am Surg ; 72(4): 314-7, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16676854

ABSTRACT

Conventional wound care is the elementary treatment modality for treating chronic wounds. However, early treatment with topical growth factors may be needed for a subset of chronic wounds that fail to heal with good wound care alone. A prospective nonrandomized case series from a single-community outpatient wound care clinic is presented here in an effort to identify the subset of chronic wounds that may require early adjuvant intervention. There were 378 consecutive patients with 774 chronic wounds of varying etiology. All patients received 4 weeks of conventional wound care, including weekly debridement and twice-daily dressing changes. Wounds not reduced by 50 per cent volume at 4 weeks were nonrandomly treated with human skin equivalent (Apligraf), platelet-derived wound healing factor, or platelet-derived growth factor isoform BB (becaplermin gel, Regranex). A total of 601 of 774 (78%) wounds healed regardless of treatment type. The median time to heal for all wounds was 49 days (interquartile range = 26-93). More women than men healed (85% vs 71%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Diabetic wounds were as likely to heal as nondiabetic wounds (78% vs 80%, P = 0.5675). Wounds that did not heal had larger volumes and higher grade compared with wounds that healed (P < 0.0001 for both variables). The data presented here show that the majority of chronic wounds will heal with conventional wound care, regardless of etiology. Large wounds with higher grades are less responsive to conventional wound care and will benefit from topical growth factor treatment early in the treatment course.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities , Comprehensive Health Care , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Trauma Severity Indices , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/pathology
5.
Am Surg ; 72(12): 1238-40, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17216828

ABSTRACT

Many surgeons routinely obtain liver function tests (LFTs) after all laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Others argue that LFTs provide no useful information and add time and expense to the patient's hospitalization. This purpose of this study was to determine if routine postoperative LFTs predict complications. One hundred ninety-nine consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the analysis. Nine (4.5%) patients had postoperative complications: eight with retained common bile duct stones and one with a cystic duct stump leak. All were diagnosed with postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Only four of the nine patients had hyperbilirubinemia. Overall, 39 patients had postcholecystectomy hyperbilirubinemia, with four (10%) patients having complications (three retained stones and one had a bile leak). For the entire study population, there was no difference between pre- and postoperative total bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase levels (0.6 vs 0.6 mg/dL; P = 0.623 and 25 vs 41 U/L; P = 0.111, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in pre- and postoperative alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase (31 vs 50 U/L; P = 0.003 and 95 vs 90 U/L; P = 0.001, respectively). Postoperative elevations in liver function tests are frequently seen after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These elevations do not predict postoperative complications. LFTs should be obtained only when clinically indicated.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Liver Function Tests , Adult , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Alkaline Phosphatase/blood , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Bile , Bilirubin/blood , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Cystic Duct/surgery , Female , Forecasting , Gallstones/pathology , Gallstones/surgery , Humans , Hyperbilirubinemia/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies
6.
Am Surg ; 71(6): 526-7, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16044937

ABSTRACT

Many surgeons are familiar with Amyand hernia, which is an inguinal hernia sac containing an appendix. However, few surgeons know of the contribution of Rene Jacques Croissant de Garengeot, an 18th century Parisian surgeon, to hernias. He is quoted in the literature as the first to describe the appendix in a femoral hernia sac. We discuss the case of an 81-year-old woman who presented with appendicitis within a femoral hernia, a rare finding at surgery that is almost never diagnosed preoperatively. We also propose crediting Croissant de Garengeot by naming this condition after him. Although his full last name is Croissant de Garengeot, for convenience we suggest the simple diagnosis of "de Garengeot hernia."


Subject(s)
Appendicitis/complications , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Hernia, Femoral/complications , Hernia, Femoral/diagnosis , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Appendicitis/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hernia, Femoral/surgery , Humans , Rare Diseases , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...