Racial bias in cesarean decision-making.

BACKGROUND: Category II fetal heart tracing noted during continuous external fetal monitoring is a frequent indication for cesarean delivery in the United States despite its somewhat subjective interpretation. Black patients have higher rates of cesarean delivery and higher rates for this indication. Racial bias in clinical decision-making has been demonstrated throughout medicine, including in obstetrics. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine if racial bias affects providers' decisions about cesarean delivery for an indication of category II fetal heart tracings. STUDY DESIGN: We constructed an online survey study consisting of 2 clinical scenarios of patients in labor with category II tracings. Patient race was randomized to Black and White; the vignettes were otherwise identical. Participants had the option to continue with labor or to proceed with a cesarean delivery at 3 decision points in each scenario. Participants reported their own demographics anonymously. This survey was distributed to obstetrical providers via email, listserv, and social media. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests at each decision point in the overall sample and in subgroup analyses by various participant demographics. RESULTS: A total of 726 participants contributed to the study. We did not find significant racial bias in cesarean delivery decision-making overall. However, in a scenario of a patient with a previous cesarean delivery, Fisher's exact tests showed that providers <40 years old (n=322; P=.01) and those with <10 years of experience (n=239; P=.050) opted for a cesarean delivery for Black patients more frequently than for White patients at the first decision point. As labor progressed in this scenario, the rates of cesarean delivery equalized across patient race. CONCLUSION: Younger providers and those with fewer years of clinical experience demonstrated racial bias in cesarean delivery decision-making at the first decision point early in labor. Providers did not show racial bias as labor progressed, nor in the scenario with a patient without a previous cesarean delivery. This bias may be the consequence of provider training with the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Network Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Calculator, developed in 2007, and widely used to estimate the probability of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery. This calculator used race as a predictive factor until it was removed in June 2021. Future studies should investigate if this bias persists following this change, while also focusing on interventions to address these findings.

Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring in pregnant patients with palpitations.

UNLABELLED: OBJECTIVE To assess the frequency of rhythm disturbances (RDs) obtained following placement of a Holter monitor or an event loop recorder (ERT) in patients referred to cardiologists. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-six gravidas were referred to the cardiology clinic for palpitations, syncope, or dizziness and had Holter monitoring or ERT after a baseline electroencephalogram. Arrhythmias were classified by severity. RESULTS: Gestational age at referral was 22.6 weeks ± 8.3 days. Sixty-five patients had ERTs performed, and 19 had Holter monitors. Seventy-six percent had benign arrhythmias. In our ERT cohort, history of arrhythmias showed a fourfold increase in serious RD during gestation (odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 20.3, p = 0.01); obesity (body mass index > 30) had a fourfold increased risk (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.0 to 1, p = 0.03). Serious RD did not result in greater chance of cesarean delivery or induction of labor, or a newborn with arrhythmias. CONCLUSION: Most pregnant women with palpitations have benign arrhythmias. ERT appears to be a better method of diagnosis in pregnant women.

Discussion: 'Factor V Leiden mutation' by Kjellberg et al.

In the roundtable that follows, clinicians discuss a study published in this issue of the Journal in light of its methodology, relevance to practice, and implications for future research.