ABSTRACT
Introduction The canal-to-calcar isthmus (CC) ratio has been previously correlated with proximal femur osteology, but its relationship with bone density is not well established. Our purpose was to assess the relationship between femoral bone density, measured on opportunistic quantitative CT in Hounsfield units (HU), and CC ratio. Methods A total of 148 THA patients were included. The CC ratio was measured on anteroposterior hip radiographs. Using perioperative CT scans, a 1 cm diameter area was identified on a single mid-coronal slice in the medial calcar just proximal to the intertrochanteric ridge. The mean HU was calculated in this region to represent calcar bone density. Results Twenty-four percent (n = 35) of patients were classified as Dorr A (average CC ratio 0.47 [0.45; 0.48]), 67% (n = 96) as Dorr B (0.62 [0.55; 0.68]), and 11% (n = 17) as Dorr C (0.78 [0.77; 0.80]). There was a significant difference between Dorr A and Dorr C femurs (769 (144) vs. 588 (154) HU) as well as between B and C femurs (718 (166) vs. 588 (154) HU). The CC ratio was correlated with calcar bone density on CT (-0.370). Conclusion CC ratio is correlated with bone density determined by HU measurements on an opportunistic quantitative computed tomography scan, and bone density HU values were able to accurately differentiate bone density in Dorr A and B from Dorr C femurs. These findings suggest that the CC ratio is a reliable measurement to predict bone density in Dorr C femurs. Therefore, arthroplasty surgeons can confidently use the Dorr classification for patients with Dorr C femurs when preoperatively planning for THA.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Although many studies have been performed, no consensus exists as to the ideal entry for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. We sought out to compare the safety of direct trocar insertion with that of the Veress needle entry technique in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Setting: We searched Medline, ClinicalTrials.Gov, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from their inception through 31 July 2021 for relevant studies. We included only controlled trials and ultimately seven trials were included in our meta-analysis. Participants: Inclusion criteria included women undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Intervention: The intervention of direct trocar insertion technique compared with Veress needle entry technique. Main outcome measures: We compared five different outcomes associated with the efficacy and complications of laparoscopic entry. Results: The pooled analysis showed that Veress needle entry was associated with a significant increase in the incidences of extraperitoneal insufflation (RR=0.177, 95% Cl (0.094 to 0.333), p<0.001), omental injury (RR=0.418, 95% Cl (0.195 to 0.896), p<0.001), failed entry (RR=0.173, 95% Cl (0.102 to 0.292), p<0.001), and trocar site infection (RR=0.404, 95% Cl (0.180 to 0.909), p<0.029). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the visceral injury (RR=0.562, 95% Cl (0.047 to 6.676), p<0.648). Conclusions: When excluding all data apart from gynecologic surgery, the Veress needle entry technique may have an increased incidence of some, but not all complications of laparoscopic entry. It may also have a higher incidence of failed entry compared with direct entry techniques. Care should be taken in extrapolating these general results to specific surgeon experience levels. Trial registration number: CRD42021273726.
