ABSTRACT
ImportanceMultisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is the most severe life-threatening clinical entity associated with pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection. Whether COVID-19 mRNA vaccine can induce this complication in children is unknown. ObjectiveTo assess the risk of hyper-inflammatory syndrome following COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in children. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsPost-authorization national population-based surveillance using the French enhanced pharmacovigilance surveillance system for COVID-19 vaccines. All cases of suspected hyper-inflammatory syndrome following COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in 12- 17-year-old children between June 15th, 2021 and January 1st, 2022, were reported. Each case was assessed for WHO MIS-C criteria. Causality assessment followed 2019 WHO recommendations. ExposureCOVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Main Outcome and MeasuresThe main outcome was the reporting rate of post-vaccine hyper-inflammatory syndrome per 1,000,000 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses in 12-17-year-old children. This reporting rate was compared to the MIS-C rate per 1,000,000 12-17-year-old children infected by SARS-CoV-2. Secondary outcomes included the comparison of clinical features between post-vaccine hyper-inflammatory syndrome and post SARS-CoV-2 MIS-C. ResultsFrom June 2021 to January 2022, 8,113,058 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses were administered to 4,079,234 12-17-year-old children. Among them, 9 presented a multisystemic hyper-inflammatory syndrome. All cases fulfilled MIS-C WHO criteria. Main clinical features included male predominance (8/9, 89%), cardiac involvement (8/9, 89%), digestive symptoms (7/9, 78%), coagulopathy (5/9, 54%), cytolytic hepatitis (4/9, 46%), and shock (3/9, 33%). 3/9 (33%) required intensive care unit transfer, and 2/9 (22%) hemodynamic support. All cases recovered. Only three cases had evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The reporting rate was 1.1 (95%CI [0.5; 2.1]) per 1,000,000 doses injected. As a comparison, 113 MIS-C (95%CI [95; 135]) occurred per 1,000,000 12-17-year-old children infected by SARS-CoV-2. Clinical features (inflammatory parameters, cytopenia) slightly differed from post-SARS-CoV-2 MIS-C, along with short-term outcomes (less PICU transfer than MIS-C). Conclusion and RelevanceVery few cases of hyper-inflammatory syndromes with multi-organ involvement occurred following COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in 12-17-year-old children. The low reporting rate of this syndrome, compared to the rate of MIS-C among same age children infected by SARS-CoV-2, supports the benefit of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in children. Further studies are required to explore specific pathways of this entity compared to post-SARS-CoV-2 MIS-C. Key pointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSIs COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in 12-17-year-old children associated with subsequent multisystemic hyper-inflammatory syndrome? FindingsThe French national pharmacovigilance system identified 9 children with a hyper-inflammatory syndrome with multi-organ involvement following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination (reporting rate 1.1 [0.5; 2.1] per 1,000,000 doses), of which only three had evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. All cases fulfilled WHO definition for MIS-C, but clinical and immunological features, along with short-term outcomes, slightly differed from classical post SARS-CoV-2 MIS-C. MeaningVery rare cases of hyper-inflammatory syndrome can occur following COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in 12-17-year-old children. The very low rate of this entity, compared to classical post-SARS-CoV-2 MIS-C, supports the benefit of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in children.
ABSTRACT
Type I and III interferons (IFN-I/{lambda}) are key antiviral mediators against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here, we demonstrate that plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are the predominant IFN-I/{lambda} source following their sensing of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. Mechanistically, this short-range sensing by pDCs requires sustained integrin-mediated cell adhesion with infected cells. In turn, pDCs restrict viral spread by an IFN-I/{lambda} response directed toward SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. This specialized function enables pDCs to efficiently turn-off viral replication, likely via a local response at the contact site with infected cells. By exploring the pDC response in SARS-CoV-2 patients, we further demonstrate that pDC responsiveness inversely correlates with the severity of the disease. The pDC response is particularly impaired in severe COVID-19 patients. Overall, we propose that pDC activation is essential to control SARS-CoV-2-infection. Failure to unfold this response could be key to understand severe cases of COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundCOVID-19 long-haulers or "long-COVID" represent 10% of COVID-19 patients and remain understudied. MethodsIn this prospective study, we recruited 30 consecutive patients seeking medical help for persistent symptoms (> 30 days) attributed to COVID-19. All reported a viral illness compatible with COVID-19. The patients underwent a multi-modal evaluation including clinical, psychological, virological, specific immunological assays and were followed longitudinally. ResultsThe median age was 40 [interquartile range: 35-54] and 18 (60%) were female. After a median time of 152 [102-164] days after symptom onset, fever, cough and dyspnea were less frequently reported as compared with the initial presentation, but paresthesia and burning pain emerged in 18 (60%) and 13 (43%) patients, respectively. The clinical examination was unremarkable in all patients although the median fatigue and pain visual analogic scales were 7 [5-8] and 5 [2-6], respectively. Extensive biological studies were unremarkable, as were multiplex cytokine and ultra-sensitive interferon-a2 measurements. At this time, nasopharyngeal swab and stool RT-PCR were negative for all tested patients. Using SARS-CoV-2 serology and IFN-{gamma} ELISPOT, we found evidence of a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in 50% (15/30) of patients, with objective evidence of lack or waning of immune response in two. Finally, psychiatric evaluation showed that 11 (36.7%), 13 (43.3%) and 9 (30%) patients had a positive screening for anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, respectively. ConclusionsHalf of patients seeking medical help for long-COVID lack SARS-CoV-2 immunity. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 immunity did not cluster clinically or biologically long haulers, who reported severe fatigue, altered quality of life, and exhibited psychological distress. Key pointsO_LIAmong 30 consecutive patients reporting persistent symptoms (median 6 months) self-attributed to COVID-19, pain, fatigue and disability were reported in virtually all patients. C_LIO_LIMore than one third of patients suffer from psychological disorders such as anxiety, depression and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, regardless of SARS-CoV-2 immunity. C_LIO_LIAt the time of evaluation, only 50% of patients had cellular and/or humoral sign of a past SARS-CoV-2, and serology positivity varied depending of the kit used. C_LIO_LIExhaustive clinical, biological and immunological evaluations failed to find an alternative diagnosis, or to identify specific cytokine signature including type I interferon. C_LI
ABSTRACT
ObjectivesImpairment of type I interferon (IFN-I) immunity has been reported in critically-ill COVID-19 patients. This defect can be explained in a subset of patients by the presence of circulating autoantibodies (auto-Abs) against IFN-I. We set out to improve the detection and the quantification of IFN-I auto-Abs in a cohort of critically-ill COVID-19 patients, in order to better evaluate the prevalence of these Abs as the pandemic progresses, and how they correlate with the clinical course of the disease. MethodsThe concentration of anti-IFN-2 Abs was determined in the serum of 84 critically-ill COVID-19 patients who were admitted to ICU in Hospices Civils de Lyon, France using a commercially available kit (Thermo-Fisher, Catalog #BMS217). ResultsA total of 21/84 (25%) critically-ill COVID-19 patients had circulating anti-IFN-2 Abs above cut-off (>34 ng.mL-1). Among them, 15/21 had Abs with neutralizing activity against IFN-2, i.e. 15/84 (18%) of critically-ill patients. In addition, we noticed an impairment of the IFN-I response in the majority of patients with neutralizing anti-IFN-2 Abs. There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics or outcome of with or without neutralizing anti-IFN-2 auto-Abs. We detected anti-IFN-2 auto-Abs in COVID-19 patients sera throughout their ICU stay. Finally, we also found auto-Abs against multiple subtypes of IFN-I including IFN-{omega}. ConclusionsWe reported that 18% of critically-ill COVID-19 patients were positive for IFN-I auto-Abs, confirming that the presence of these antibodies is associated with higher risk of developing a criticall COVID-19 form.
