Cochlear reimplantation: surgical techniques and functional results.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The most common indication for cochlear reimplantation is device failure. Other, less frequent indications consist of "upgrades" (e.g., single to multichannel), infection, and flap breakdown. Although the percentage of failures has decreased over time, an occasional patient requires reimplantation because of device malfunction. The varying designs of internal receiver/stimulators and electrode arrays mandate an examination of the nature and effects of reimplantation for the individual designs. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the reimplantation of several implant designs and to determine whether differences in surgical technique, anatomical findings, and postoperative performance exist. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: The subjects were 33 of 618 severely to profoundly deaf adults and children who had implantation at the New York University Medical Center (New York, NY) between February 1984 and December 2000. The subjects had previously had implantation with either a single-channel 3M/House (House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, CA) or 3M/Vienna (Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria) device or with one of the multichannel Clarion (Advanced Bionics, Sylmar, CA), Ineraid (Smith & Nephew Richards, TN), or Nucleus (including the Contour) devices (Cochlear Corp., Englewood, CO) before reimplantation. RESULTS: Length of use before reimplantation ranged from 1 month to 13 years and included traumatic and atraumatic (electronic) failures, as well as device extrusion or infection. Results indicated that postoperative performance was either equal to or better than scores before failure. None of the devices explanted caused damage that precluded the implantation of the same or an upgraded device. These findings support the efficacy and safety of internal implant designs as related to the maintenance of a functional cochlea for the purpose of reimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear reimplantation can be performed safely and without decrement to performance. The number of implanted electrodes at reinsertion were either the same or greater in all cases.

Electrode to modiolus proximity: a fluoroscopic and histologic analysis.

HYPOTHESIS: This study was conducted to evaluate the electrode to modiolus proximity of two commonly used electrodes (Nucleus and Clarion) and a new prototype electrode. BACKGROUND: Theoretical advantages of modiolus-hugging cochlear implant electrodes include reduced stimulus energy requirements, more efficient power management and longer battery life, more discreet ganglion cell population stimulation, and reduced facial nerve stimulation. METHODS: Fluoroscopic analysis and histologic surface preparation analysis of electrode position and trauma. RESULTS: The Nucleus straight electrode occupied an outer wall position in the scala tympani. The Clarion electrode occupied a more intermediate position. The actively coiling prototype electrode was modiolus hugging but caused more trauma than the other two electrodes tested. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal modiolus-hugging atraumatic intracochlear electrode does not currently exist.

Stability of the cochlear implant array in children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine cochlear implant electrode stability in the young patient. Electrode migration due to future skull growth was a concern that led to prohibiting implantation in children less than 2 years of age. Recently, the high level of performance achieved by young implantees has led to a re-evaluation of this lower age limit, requiring an assessment of the effects of skull growth over time. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective radiographic analysis of electrode position of cochlear implants in young children. METHODS: Twenty-seven children implanted with the Nucleus (Cochlear Corp., Denver, CO) or Clarion (Advanced Bionics Inc., Sylmar, CA) multi-channel cochlear prostheses were subjects for this study. Follow-up radiographic studies were obtained for a period of 1 month to 5 years after implantation. The age at time of implantation ranged from 14 months to 5 years. An intraoperative modified Stenver's view plain radiograph was obtained as a baseline. After implantation, on a yearly basis transorbital Stenver's and base views were obtained for comparative purposes. Additional radiographs were obtained whenever a change in performance or electrode map caused suspicion for extrusion. Electrode position was determined using a computer graphics enhancement technique whereby image contrast filters enhanced the visibility of the electrode array and surrounding bony structures. RESULTS: An analysis of the data revealed no migration of the electrode array over time. CONCLUSIONS: The confirmation of the stability of the electrode array alleviates the concern of the effects of skull growth on cochlear implantation in young children.

Replantation of the amputated nose.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of replantation in the treatment of nasal amputations. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A university medical center. RESULTS: In no case did the replant survive completely, and in all cases revision surgery was required. However, in all cases, the resulting deformity was less than the original defect. In our pediatric patients, reconstruction with cartilage grafting and a midline forehead flap was successful and demonstrated proportionate and appropriate growth. CONCLUSIONS: It is our belief that replantation serves many therapeutic functions. At the very least, there is the psychological/emotional factor that is involved in attempting to replace a native body part that has been severed. Also, it is difficult to persuade parents and patients that the amputated tissue that has been handled with kid gloves by paramedics, maintaining its pink "alive" color, is ultimately doomed to failure. Forehead flaps and conchal cartilage grafts are more willingly accepted after a "failed" replantation than as primary reconstructions. In every instance, we believe, the ultimate defect will be smaller than the original deformity. Certainly, the need for vestibular lining reconstruction is far less. Thus, the ultimate healed defect from the replantation greatly facilitates final nasal reconstruction.