Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pathol Biol (Paris) ; 60(3): e30-5, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21621347

ABSTRACT

16S rRNA gene-based cultivation-independent methods are increasingly used to study the diversity of microbiota during health and disease. One bias of these methods is the variability of 16S rRNA gene that may exist among strains of a same species (intraspecific heterogeneity) or between rrs copies in a genome (intragenomic heterogeneity). We evaluated the level of intraspecific and intragenomic 16S rDNA variability in seven species frequently encountered in respiratory tract samples in cystic fibrosis (CF). A total of 179 strains were subjected to V3 region 16S rDNA PCR-TTGE. Using this easy-to-perform and rapid method, different levels of V3 region rrs heterogeneity were demonstrated. No intraspecific and intragenomic rrs heterogeneity was demonstrated for Moraxella catarrhalis (n=16), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=31) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=14) showing a single PCR-TTGE band characteristic of the species. Low level of intraspecific heterogeneity was observed for Staphylococcus aureus (n=30), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n=29) and Achromobacter xylosoxidans (n=28), and 17%, 38% and 96% of these strains showed intragenomic heterogeneity (two to four different rrs copies), respectively. Haemophilus influenzae (n=31) displayed the higher level of intraspecific variability with 23 different PCR-TTGE patterns and 61% of the strains showed intragenomic rrs heterogeneity (two to four different rrs copies). Although only one hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was explored, intraspecific and intragenomic rrs heterogeneity was frequently observed in this study and should be taken into consideration for a better interpretation of 16S rRNA gene-based diversity profiles in denaturing gels and to avoid any overestimation of the respiratory microbiota diversity in CF.


Subject(s)
Cystic Fibrosis/microbiology , Genetic Variation/physiology , Genome, Bacterial/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Bacteriological Techniques , Cystic Fibrosis/complications , Electrophoresis, Agar Gel/methods , Genes, Bacterial , Humans , Respiratory Tract Infections/complications , Species Specificity , Temperature
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 31(4): 599-604, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21904858

ABSTRACT

Glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA), particularly heterogeneous GISA (hGISA), remain difficult to detect in the routine practice of medical microbiology. Novel tools have been evaluated comparatively to the population analysis profile-area under the curve (PAP-AUC) reference method for detecting GISA/hGISA. Among them, the Etest GRD showed relatively high specificity (85.8-97%) and negative predictive value (97%) but lower sensibility (57-95%) and positive predictive value (30.8%). We investigated the utility of the Etest GRD for detecting GISA/hGISA among 180 strains isolated from 106 cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Etest GRD was performed on all isolates, and those exhibiting a GISA/hGISA phenotype were further tested by PAP-AUC and other agar routine assays for GISA/hGISA detection. The Etest GRD allowed the detection of 15 GISA/hGISA strains, of which eight were confirmed by the reference method. Despite the 3.9% level of false positive results, the Etest GRD constitutes a useful routine tool for detecting GISA/hGISA overlooked by other routine assays, two strains being detected by the Etest GRD only. GISA/hGISA represented 7.7% of MRSA and 2.1% of MSSA, and were found in 4.7% of CF patients colonized/infected by S. aureus, which is the highest rate reported to date in this population.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cystic Fibrosis/complications , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Glycopeptides/pharmacology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...