ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:: Comparison of biometric measurements and calculation of intraocular lens with a new biometer (Pentacam®-AXL, Oculus, Germany) and a reference biometer (Lenstar LS 900®, Haag-Streit AG, Switzerland), in order to assess the agreement between these two devices. SETTING:: Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Portugal. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Prospective, institutional study, in which measurements of axial length, anterior chamber depth from the corneal epithelium and endothelium to the anterior surface of the lens (anterior chamber depth ext and anterior chamber depth int), central corneal thickness and keratometry readings of the flattest and steepest meridians (K1 and K2) were obtained with the two systems. Intraocular lens calculation was also performed, using the Haigis, SRK/T and HofferQ formulas. RESULTS:: The study sample included 136 eyes of 79 patients. Of these, 42 were women and 37 were men. Statistically significant differences were found (p < 0.05, paired T test) in K1, K2 and central corneal thickness between the 2 biometers. Intraocular lens calculation with the Lenstar® and the Pentacam® with Haigis, SRK/T and HofferQ formulas showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05 Paired T test). CONCLUSION:: Axial length measurements obtained with the Pentacam® and Lenstar® appear to be interchangeable, while measurements of anterior chamber depth, K1 and K2, and central corneal thickness do not appear to be interchangeable between different devices. Statistically significant differences were found in the calculation of intraocular lenses in all formulas used.
Subject(s)
Biometry/instrumentation , Cataract/pathology , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Lenses, Intraocular , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anterior Chamber/pathology , Axial Length, Eye/pathology , Biometry/methods , Cataract Extraction , Cornea/pathology , Female , Humans , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/instrumentation , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report a case of a 56-year-old male with right homonymous hemianopia. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study of a case report based on information from clinical records, patient observation and analysis of complementary diagnostic tests. RESULTS: An asymptomatic 56-year-old male presented to our hospital for a routine ophthalmic examination. The best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in the right eye (RE) and in the left eye (LE). Pupillary function, intraocular pressure, external segment examinations and slit-lamp biomicroscopy were normal, bilaterally. Fundoscopy showed a cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio in the RE of 0.3 and of 0.4 in the LE. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography revealed thinning of the superior, temporal and nasal RNFL in the RE and thinning of the superior, inferior and temporal RNFL in the LE. Automated static perimetry showed right homonymous hemianopia. Brain computed tomography (CT) showed an open-lip schizencephaly with a significant reduction of the left brain parenchyma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the large visual defect, the patient was unaware of it and had an active professional life. This is an interesting case because despite the extensive morphological abnormalities seen on brain CT there is a relatively small functional repercussion.
