ABSTRACT
Background: With the growing incidence of diabetic-related complications such as retinopathy and the well-understood role of screening and telemedicine around the world in preventing and managing this potentially blinding disease, there comes the importance of awareness toward this silent eye condition. Awareness ideally should be raised both from the patients' and physicians' perspectives. This study aims to assess the awareness of primary care physicians (PCPs) towards diabetic retinopathy (DR) and its management. Materials and Methods: A survey considering professional background, knowledge, and practices was distributed electronically to all PCPs in the Kingdom of Bahrain and analyzed using SPSS Vs 21. Results: A total of 83 physicians completed the survey; 81.9% were female and 96.4% were Bahraini. More than 60% of them accurately knew screening guidelines for type 1 and 2 DR. Of the total, 72.5% would refer patients to the ophthalmologist even if asymptomatic, and 97.6% correctly stated that a dilated eye exam is the method of choice most efficient for assessing DR. Nearly 60% knew about the current treatment modalities for DR and 91.3% knew about the presence of a national screening program in the Kingdom. Conclusion: The overall knowledge of DR was good with some potential gaps in information about screening. PCPs could benefit from regular refresher courses for more precise practices on screening and referral of retinopathy.
ABSTRACT
Results: Of 1,111 patients, 1,101 (99.1%) were included in the study. 589 (53.6%) patients were males. Median age at the time of endoscopy was 8 (interquartile range 3, 11) years. 1534 endoscopies were performed (1193 upper GI endoscopies (UGIE) and 341 colonoscopies) in 1296 sessions. The mean number of endoscopies per year was 59 ± 30.9 procedures with 81.4% reduction noted after coronavirus pandemic (P < 0.0001). Ratio between UGIE to colonoscopy was 3.5 : 1. Median number of endoscopies per patient was one, ranging from one to eight procedures. 1153 (89%) sessions were diagnostic, and 143 (11.0%) were therapeutic. Main endoscopic indication was chronic abdominal pain (451 (40.9%) patients) followed by upper GI bleeding (302 (27.4%) patients). Overall positive yield was 68.1% (716/1052 procedures). Endoscopic yield varies according to the type of procedure (P = 0.003). Colonoscopy alone gave a higher yield (82.6%, 38/46 procedures) compared to combined procedures (75.4%, 141/187) and UGIE alone (65.6%, 537/819). Conclusions: This study emphasizes a careful selection of the type of endoscopic procedures, based on the expected endoscopic yield, to diagnose and treat pediatric GI diseases. In patients with chronic abdominal pain, endoscopy should be reserved as a second-line tool to avoid unnecessary use of invasive procedures.
