Comparative pharmacodynamics of telithromycin and clarithromycin with Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro dynamic model: focus on clinically achievable antibiotic concentrations.

To compare the pharmacodynamics of telithromycin and clarithromycin, killing kinetics of differentially susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus exposed to clinical doses of telithromycin and clarithromycin were studied in an in vitro dynamic model that simulates human pharmacokinetics. With S. pneumoniae, a bacterial strain-independent and antibiotic-independent relationship was delineated for the area between the control growth curve and the time-kill curve (ABBC) and the simulated ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Based on the ABBC-AUC/MIC relationship, a greater anti-pneumococcal effect of 800mg telithromycin compared with 2x500 mg clarithromycin was predicted for a hypothetical strain with MICs equal to the respective MIC50 values. Although telithromycin was less efficient against S. aureus, treatment for 3 days with telithromycin was not accompanied by a loss in susceptibility, whereas the enrichment of resistant staphylococci occurred with one of the two clarithromycin-treated strains.

Comparative pharmacodynamics of the new fluoroquinolone ABT492 and levofloxacin with Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro dynamic model.

The kinetics of killing of Streptococcus pneumoniae exposed to ABT492 or levofloxacin were compared. S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 and four ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates, S. pneumoniae 1149, 391, 79 and 804, were exposed to ABT492 and levofloxacin as a single dose in a dynamic model that simulates human pharmacokinetics of the quinolones. With S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 eight-fold ranging AUC/MIC ratios (60-500 h) were simulated for each quinolone. In addition, two larger AUC/MICs, i.e., 1080 and 2150 h for ABT492 and 1460 and 3660 h for levofloxacin which correspond to 100 and 200 mg doses of ABT492 and 200 and 500 mg doses of levofloxacin, respectively, were mimicked. Each ciprofloxacin-resistant organism was exposed to the clinical doses of ABT492 (400 mg) and levofloxacin (500 mg); the respective AUC/MIC ratios were from 580 to 3470 h and from 28 to 110 h. At comparable AUC/MICs (from 60 to 500 h), regrowth of S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 followed initial killing, and the times to regrowth were longer with levofloxacin than ABT492. However, no regrowth of S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 occurred at the higher AUC/MICs of ABT492 (1080 and 2150 h) and levofloxacin (1460 and 3660 h). Killing of S. pneumoniae 1149, 391 and 79 without bacterial regrowth, was provided by ABT492 (AUC/MIC 3470, 2310 and 1160 h, respectively) but not levofloxacin (AUC/MIC 55, 110 and 28 h, respectively). Regrowth of S. pneumoniae 804 was observed with both ABT492 and levofloxacin (AUC/MIC 580 and 55 h, respectively). Areas between the control growth curve and the time-kill curve (ABBCs) for ABT492 against S. pneumoniae 1149, 391 and 79 were 2.6-4.2 times larger than the respective ABBCs for levofloxacin, whereas similar ABBCs were found with S. pneumoniae 804 exposed to both quinolones. These findings predict significantly greater efficacy of ABT492 than levofloxacin at clinically achievable AUC/MIC ratios against ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae and similar efficacies of the two quinolones against susceptible organisms.

Comparative pharmacodynamics of the new fluoroquinolone ABT492 and ciprofloxacin with Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro dynamic model.

The killing kinetics of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were compared when exposed to ABT492 and ciprofloxacin. E. coli ATCC 25922 and a clinical isolate of P. aeruginosa 4226 were exposed to ABT492 (single dose) and ciprofloxacin (two 12 h doses) at the ratios of area under the curve (AUC) to MIC varying from 60 to 480 h and at clinically achievable AUC/MIC ratios of ABT492 (1,740 and 140 h, respectively) and ciprofloxacin (2,200 and 120 h, respectively) that correspond to a 400 mg dose of ABT492 and two 500 mg doses of ciprofloxacin. In addition, a double dose of ABT492 (800 mg; AUC/MIC 280 h) and two 12 h doses of ABT492 (2 x 400 mg) were used with P. aeruginosa. Maximal reductions in the starting inoculum of E. coli and P. aeruginosa were greater with ABT492 than with ciprofloxacin at a given AUC/MIC ratio (60-480 h), whereas the times to regrowth were shorter with ABT492. A specific AUC/MIC relationship of the antimicrobial effect was inherent in each quinolone-pathogen pair. With both E. coli and P. aeruginosa, AUC/MIC plots of the area between the control growth and the time-kill curves (I(E)) were steeper for ciprofloxacin than ABT492 and they were species-independent. The effect of ABT492 on E. coli at the clinically achievable AUC/MIC ratio (1740h) was more pronounced than the respective AUC/MIC of ciprofloxacin (2,200 h). With P. aeruginosa, a 140 h AUC/MIC of ABT492 (400 mg as a single dose) provided 1.8-fold less effect than a 120 h AUC/MIC of ciprofloxacin (2 x 500 mg). However, two 12 h doses of ABT492 (AUC/MIC 2 x 140 h) but not a double single dose (800 mg) were more efficient than ciprofloxacin. These findings predict comparable efficacies of clinically achievable AUC/MICs of ABT492 and ciprofloxacin against E. coli (q.d. versus b.i.d. quinolone dosing) and P. aeruginosa at b.i.d. but not at q.d. ABT492.