Systemic Determinants in Surgery: Nonclinical Factors Affecting Time to Operation for Incarcerated Ventral Hernias.

INTRODUCTION: We explore nonclinical factors affecting the amount of time from admission to the operating room for patients requiring nonelective repair of ventral hernias. METHODS: Using the 2005-2012 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified adult patients with a primary diagnosis of ventral hernia without obstruction/gangrene, who underwent nonelective repair. The outcome variable of interest was time from admission to surgery. We performed univariate and multivariable analyses using negative binomial regression, adjusting for age, sex, race, income, insurance, admission day, comorbidity status (van Walraven score), diagnosis, procedure, hospital size, location/teaching status, and region. RESULTS: 7,253 patients met criteria, of which majority were women (n = 4,615) and white (n = 5,394). The majority of patients had private insurance (n = 3,015) followed by Medicare (n = 2,737). Median time to operation was 0 days. Univariate analysis comparing operation <1 day to ≥1 day identified significant differences in race, day of admission, insurance, length of stay, comorbidity status, hospital location, type, and size. Negative binomial regression showed that weekday admission (IRR 4.42, P < .0001), private insurance (IRR 1.53-2.66, P < .0001), rural location (IRR 1.39-1.76, P < .01), small hospital size (IRR 1.26-1.36, P < .05), white race (IRR 1.30-1.34, P < .01), healthier patients (van Walraven score IRR 1.05, P < .0001), and use of mesh (IRR 0.39-0.56, P < .02) were associated with shorter time until procedure. CONCLUSION: Shorter time from admission to the operating room was associated with several nonclinical factors, which suggest disparities may exist. Further prospective studies are warranted to elucidate these disparities affecting patient care.

Comparing Surgical Outcomes Among Patients Admitted for Small Bowel Obstruction on Weekend vs. Weekday.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical intervention is important in reducing morbidity and mortality among patients admitted for small bowel obstruction (SBO). Patient-specific variables such as age and comorbidities are risk factors for adverse outcomes after surgery for SBO. However, the effect of weekend admission on outcomes has not been well delineated in the literature. Our aim was to determine whether weekend admission affects mortality and length of stay (LOS) in patients who were admitted for SBO and were managed operatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the 2006-2012 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified adult patients who were admitted with a primary diagnosis of SBO and had a primary procedure of exploratory laparotomy, lysis of adhesions, or small bowel resection. We performed univariate analysis comparing cases that were admitted on the weekend vs. weekday. We then performed negative binomial regression with LOS as the dependent variable, adjusting for risk variables. RESULTS: 2804 patients were studied, of which 728 (26.0%) were admitted on the weekend. Univariate analysis showed no statistically significant difference in mortality or LOS for patients admitted on a weekday vs. weekend. Multivariate analysis showed that several factors were associated with increased LOS, including third quartile van Walraven score (P < .0001) and large hospital size (P = .0031). Other factors were associated with decreased LOS, including fourth quartile of income (P = .0022) and weekend admission (P = .048). DISCUSSION: There is no significant difference in mortality between patients admitted on weekend vs. weekday for SBO, but patients admitted on weekend are more likely to have a decreased LOS.

Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Surgery for Perforated Diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increased adoption of minimally invasive techniques in colorectal surgery, an open resection with ostomy creation remains an accepted operation for perforated diverticulitis. In the United States, there is an increase in the rates of both morbid obesity and diverticular disease. Therefore, we wanted to explore whether outcomes for morbidly obese patients with diverticulitis are worse than nonmorbidly obese patients after open colectomy for diverticulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2015, we identified adults with emergent admission for diverticulitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code 562.11) with evidence of preoperative sepsis and intraoperative contaminated/dirty wound classification, in which a resection with ostomy (Current Procedural Terminology codes 44141, 44143, or 44144) was performed. We excluded cases with age >90 y, ventilator dependence, evidence of disseminated cancer and missing sex, race, body mass index, functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, length of stay (LOS), or operative time data. Morbid obesity was defined as body mass index >35 kg/m2. Risk variables of interest included age, sex, race, medical comorbidities, requirement for preoperative transfusion, preoperative sepsis, and operative time. Outcomes of interest included LOS, 30-d postoperative complications, and mortality. Univariate and propensity scores with postmatching analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2019 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which 413 (20.5%) were morbidly obese. Morbidly obese patients tended to be younger (mean 57.2 versus 62.6 y) and female (54.5% versus 45.5%). Morbidly obese patients also had higher rates of insulin-dependent diabetes (8.0% versus 4.2%), hypertension (60.1% versus 51.3%), renal failure (3.4% versus 1.5%), and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (class 4: 23.5% versus 19.6% and class 5: 1.45% versus 0.87%). Morbidly obese patient had no increase in 30-d mortality or LOS, but they had higher rates of superficial wound infection (9.0% versus 5.8%; P = 0.0259), deep wound infection (4.4% versus 1.9%; P = 0.0073), acute renal failure (4.8% versus 2.4%; P = 0.0189), postoperative septic shock (17.7% versus 12.1%; P = 0.0040), and return to the operating room (11.1% versus 6.4%; P = 0.0015). We identified 397 morbidly obese patients well matched by propensity score to 397 nonmorbidly obese patients. Conditional logistic regression showed no difference in LOS (median 12.9 versus 12.4 d; P = 0.4648) and no increased risk of 30-d mortality (P = 0.947), but morbid obesity was an independent predictor for return to the operating room (adjusted odds ratio: 27.09 [95% confidence interval: 2.68-274.20]; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of a large national clinical database demonstrates that morbidly obese patients presenting with perforated diverticulitis undergoing a Hartmann's procedure do not have increased mortality or LOS compared with nonobese patients. After adjusting for the effects of morbid obesity, morbidly obese patients had increased risk of return to operating room. Despite literature describing the many perioperative risks of obesity, our analysis showed only increased reoperation for obese patients with diverticulitis.

Acinar cell injury induced by inadequate unfolded protein response in acute pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disorder of pancreatic tissue initiated in injured acinar cells. Severe AP remains a significant challenge due to the lack of effective treatment. The widely-accepted autodigestion theory of AP is now facing challenges, since inhibiting protease activation has negligible effectiveness for AP treatment despite numerous efforts. Furthermore, accumulating evidence supports a new concept that malfunction of a self-protective mechanism, the unfolded protein response (UPR), is the driving force behind the pathogenesis of AP. The UPR is induced by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, a disturbance frequently found in acinar cells, to prevent the aggravation of ER stress that can otherwise lead to cell injury. In addition, the UPR's signaling pathways control NFκB activation and autophagy flux, and these dysregulations cause acinar cell inflammatory injury in AP, but with poorly understood mechanisms. We therefore summarize the protective role of the UPR in AP, propose mechanistic models of how inadequate UPR could promote NFκB's pro-inflammatory activity and impair autophagy's protective function in acinar cells, and discuss its relevance to current AP treatment. We hope that insight provided in this review will help facilitate the research and management of AP.

End Stage Renal Disease Is Associated with Increased Mortality in Perforated Gastroduodenal Ulcers.

Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) represent a growing subset of surgical candidates and ESRD status has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in other operations. Using a national database, we examined outcomes and risk factors for patients presenting with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers undergoing omentopexy. We identified adult and emergent patients with perforated duodenal and gastroduodenal ulcers that underwent omentopexy using the 2005 to 2012 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We identified patients with ESRD status and assessed comorbidity status using the Elixhauser-van Walraven score. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Inpatient mortality was the primary outcome. Six thousand five hundred and twenty-one patients were identified. Median age was 59.0 years, majority were male (55.56%), 79 (1.21%) patients had ESRD, 367 (5.63%) patients died during admission. Multivariable logistic regression showed age (OR 2.71, P < 0.0001), Elixhauser-van Walraven score (OR 2.69, P < 0.0001), and ESRD status (OR 3.88, P < 0.0001) as independent risk factors for mortality. ESRD was associated with increased mortality in patients undergoing omentopexy for perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. Future studies are necessary to identify methods to increase perioperative survival.

A Calculated Risk: Performing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis on Patients with End Stage Renal Disease.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a multifactorial disease linked to socioeconomic status and associated with worse surgical outcomes. We explore intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients with cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2012 was used to identify patients undergoing LC for cholecystitis using ICD-9 codes. Outcomes of interest were mortality, common bile duct injury, conversion to open, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), and total charge. Univariate analysis was performed using t test for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables. Multivariable models were created that adjusted for age, demographics, year of admission, comorbidities, and presence of ESRD. Of 225,058 patients that underwent LC, 2,115 had ESRD. On univariate analysis, the ESRD cohort had a higher incidence of mortality and complications: intraoperative, mechanical wound, respiratory, cardiovascular, and postoperative infections. ESRD patients had higher median LOS and total charge. Multivariate analysis showed ESRD as an independent risk factor for mortality, mechanical wound complications, and intraoperative complications. Negative binomial regression analysis showed that ESRD patients had LOS 50.4 per cent longer than non-ESRD patients. Linear regression analysis showed that, after adjustment, ESRD patients had total charge 6.82 per cent higher than non-ESRD patients. In this large retrospective analysis, we find that after adjusting for clinical, socioeconomic, and demographic variables, ESRD is an independent risk factor for increased mortality, intraoperative complications, mechanical wound complications, increased LOS, and cost for patients undergoing LC. Prospective studies exploring risk optimization strategies for patients with ESRD are warranted.

Appendectomy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus: Not as bad as we once thought.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients living with human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is growing due to advances in antiretroviral therapy. Existing literature on appendectomy within this patient population has been limited by small sample sizes. Therefore, we used a large, multiyear, nationwide database to study this topic comprehensively. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified 338,805 patients between 2005 and 2012 who underwent laparoscopic or open appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Interval appendectomies were excluded. We used multivariable adjusted regression models to test differences between patients with human immunodeficiency virus without acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and a reference group, as well as human immunodeficiency virus with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and a reference group, with regard to duration of stay, hospital charges, in-hospital complications, and in-hospital mortality. Models were adjusted for patient age, sex, race, insurance, socioeconomic status, Elixhauser comorbidity score, and appendix perforation. RESULTS: There were 1,291 (0.38%) patients with human immunodeficiency virus, among which 497 (0.15%) patients had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. In regression analysis, human immunodeficiency virus alone was not associated with adverse outcomes, while acquired immunodeficiency syndrome alone was associated with longer duration of stay (incidence rate ratio 1.40 [1.37-1.57 95% confidence interval], P < .0001), increased total charges (exponentiated coefficient 1.16 [1.10-1.23 95% confidence interval], P < .0001), and increased risk of postoperative infection (odds ratio 2.12 [1.44-3.13 95% confidence interval], P = .0002). CONCLUSION: Patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome who undergo appendectomy for acute appendicitis are subject to longer and more expensive hospital admissions and have greater rates of postoperative infections while patients with human immunodeficiency virus alone are not at risk for adverse outcomes.

How sick are dialysis patients undergoing cholecystectomy? Analysis of 92,672 patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

BACKGROUND: Although cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States, there is an absence of data on the risks of cholecystectomy in dialysis patients. Our objective was to analyze the outcomes of cholecystectomy in dialysis patients. METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we selected all patients who underwent cholecystectomy from 2005 to 2010. Univariate analysis was performed and logistic and linear regression models were used to obtain risk-adjusted outcomes. The main outcomes were morbidity, mortality, and length of stay. RESULTS: Dialysis was associated with a higher risk of 30-day postoperative morbidity (16.1% vs 3.8%, adjusted odds ratio 1.91, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 3.10), but not mortality. The average length of stay following any cholecystectomy was 4.1 days longer for dialysis patients (5.5 vs 1.4 days, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Patients on dialysis who undergo cholecystectomy are at a higher risk for postoperative morbidity, but not mortality.

End-stage renal disease increases the risk of mortality after appendectomy.

INTRODUCTION: With each passing year, the number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing steadily, but there are limited data on the postoperative outcomes of these patients after appendectomy. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified all patients who underwent appendectomy in the United States between 1998 and 2010. We used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify patients with ESRD and to track postoperative complications during hospital admission. Statistical models were controlled for age, sex, race, insurance type, number of Elixhauser comorbidities, year of admission, perforation of the appendix, and operative approach. RESULTS: The study population included 5,712 patients with ESRD, with the remaining 3,615,391 patients serving as reference controls. Patients with ESRD had risk of death that was nearly 5 times greater than controls (odds ratio [OR] 5.68; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.96-8.15; P < .001); this risk was similar for nonperforated (OR 4.97; P < .001) and perforated (5.96; P = .004) appendicitis. The risk of death, however, was greater for open appendectomy (OR 6.65; P < .001) compared with laparoscopic appendectomy (OR 2.50; P = .060). Patients with ESRD also were at an increased risk of mechanical wound complication (OR 1.58; P = .040) and had a mean duration of stay that was 34% greater compared with controls (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with ESRD undergoing appendectomy were at an increased risk of death. These patients also had an increased risk of mechanical wound complications and had a greater duration of hospital stay. Future studies should investigate the specific causes of death among patients with ESRD after appendectomy and optimal management strategies in this subset of patients.

Study habits centered on completing review questions result in quantitatively higher American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam scores.

PURPOSE: The American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam (ABSITE) is administered to all general surgery residents annually. Given the recent changes in the format of the examination and in the material being tested, it has become increasingly difficult for residents to prepare for the ABSITE. This is especially true for incoming postgraduate year (PGY) 1 residents because of the respective variability of the surgical clerkship experience. There have been many studies in the past that support the use of weekly assigned readings and examinations to improve ABSITE scores. Other studies have investigated the study habits of residents to determine those that would correlate with higher ABSITE scores. However, there is a lack of information on whether completing review questions plays an integral role in preparing for the ABSITE. We hypothesize that those residents who completed more review questions performed better on the ABSITE. METHODS: ABSITE scores of current and past general surgery residents at SUNY Downstate Medical Center, a university hospital, were reviewed (2009-2013). These residents were then polled to determine how they prepared for their first in-training examination. RESULTS: Average ABSITE percentile was 46.4. Mean number of review questions completed by residents was 516.7. Regression analysis showed that completion of more review questions was associated with a significantly higher percentile score on the ABSITE (p < 0.0027). Further analysis showed that for every 100 review questions completed by a PGY 1 resident taking the ABSITE for the first time, the ABSITE percentile score should improve by 3.117 ± 0.969. Average reported study time in hours/week was 9.26. Increased study time was also significantly correlated with higher ABSITE percentile scores (p < 0.007). Again, further analysis showed that for every 1h/wk spent studying, ABSITE percentile score should increase by 1.76 ± 0.62. The Kruskal-Wallis H test showed that studying in group vs individual settings had no effect on ABSITE performance (p = 0.20). It was also used to analyze primary study resource, which demonstrated that there was no significant difference in residents' performance based on their primary study source (p = 0.516). CONCLUSION: Recent changes in the format of the ABSITE to a 2-tiered examination in 2006 and subsequent plan to return to a unified test for all PGY levels has made preparation difficult. With a more focused, question-based approach to studying, residents may see a demonstrable improvement in their scores. Our study supports this hypothesis-showing that residents who complete more review questions had higher ABSITE percentile scores. In the past, it has been demonstrated that strong ABSITE scores are associated with higher written board scores. With the widespread adoption of the Surgical Council on Resident Education curriculum, we postulate that residency programs that rely on this review question-based curriculum will report improved ABSITE percentile scores and written board pass rates.

Multifocal micropapillary thyroid cancer: a new indication for total thyroidectomy?

American Thyroid Association guidelines recommend total thyroidectomy (TT) for thyroid cancers 1 cm or greater. Liberal use of neck sonography has resulted in an increased incidence of papillary cancers detected at earlier stages with approximately half at the micropapillary level and occasionally multifocal. Concerns regarding the safety of routine TT, especially in young patients with favorable cancers, and the clinical significance of detected multifocal micropapillary cancers have been raised. Records of 516 consecutively treated patients with thyroid cancer were reviewed. A subset of 269 cases with well-differentiated papillary thyroid cancer (WDPTC) confined within the capsule of the involved lobe undergoing TT was analyzed. Patients were stratified according to age, tumor size, evidence of ipsilateral multifocality, and presence or absence of contralateral nonpalpable malignancy. Overall contralateral histologic malignancy was demonstrated in 46.4 per cent (125 of 269). The incidence was 34 per cent (30 of 88) of subcentimeter (less than 1 cm) tumors and significantly increased to 52 per cent (95 of 181) in tumors 1 cm or greater (P = 0.006). This incidence significantly approached 76 per cent (13 of 17) in subcentimeter but multifocal tumors when 45 years or older (P = 0002). One patient developed permanent hypocalcemia (0.4%). There were no recurrent nerve injuries. The incidence of bilateral cancer was significant in 1-cm or greater WDPTC. Patients with subcentimeter multifocal tumors, when older than 45 years, were even at higher risk for bilateral cancer. Because TT is advocated for patients with WDPTC 1 cm or greater, it should also be considered in those older than 45 years with ipsilateral multifocal micropapillary cancers, because it can be performed safely.

Determination of the function of the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve after thyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Several unique complications of thyroidectomy exist because of its regional anatomy; they are well studied and reported. A majority of thyroidectomy patients report vague upper aerodigestive tract complaints. Despite this, no formal assessment of the integrity of the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve after thyroidectomy exists in the literature. METHODS: Thirty three patients undergoing thyroidectomy were prospectively evaluated with preoperative and postoperative laryngopharyngeal sensory testing. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 16 patients (49%) reported dysphagia, and 19 (58%) complained of globus sensation. Postoperatively, 24 (73%) patients complained of dysphagia, and 25 (76%) reported globus sensation. Preoperative sensory testing showed a mean sensory threshold of 2.79 +/- 0.51 mm Hg. The mean change in thresholds postoperatively was trivial (0.07 +/- 0.29 mm Hg), and did not differ significantly from zero (p = .19). CONCLUSIONS: Although most patients report significant difficulty swallowing after thyroidectomy, the sensory nerve to the laryngopharynx remains intact and is not at risk during thyroid surgery.