ABSTRACT
Introduction In recent years, the increased use of smartphones has adversely affected students, leading to issues like musculoskeletal pain. Therefore, our objective was to assess the correlation between smartphone addiction and neck and lower back pain. Methodology An observational cross-sectional study was conducted at Al-Baha University, Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia. The Smartphone Addiction Scale Short Version (SAS-SV) was used to measure the level of smartphone addiction while the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) was utilized to evaluate musculoskeletal pain. Results Smartphone addiction was prevalent in 72% of the participants (n = 293). Significantly, lower back pain was associated with smartphone addiction (p-value = 0.004). However, none of the demographic characteristics were associated with neck or lower back pain (p-value > 0.05). Students in clinical years had a higher risk of neck pain than those in an internship (p-value = 0.048). Conclusion Almost two-thirds of the students were addicted to smartphones, with a significant association with lower back pain. Students addicted to their smartphones had a higher risk of developing lower back pain, while clinical-year students had a higher risk of developing neck pain. It's important to raise awareness about the health and safety dangers linked to smartphones and other devices.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM), including type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), affects the absorption of glucose from the blood. DM has serious complications that can be prevented by adequate knowledge of the disease and its complications, a healthy lifestyle, a modified diet, and regular glucose monitoring. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effects of frequent glucose monitoring on the occurrence of DM complications. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed at King Abdulaziz University Hospital between June and December 2022 and included patients with T1D or T2D. After consent, participants who agreed to join filled out an online questionnaire that was used to acquire information, such as demographic data, type of diabetes, blood glucose monitoring, and diabetic complications. RESULTS: A total of 206 diabetic patients participated in this study, with a mean age of 41.2±19.37, with 53.4% having T1D. Most participants monitored their glucose levels (85.4%), and the majority (65.3%) monitored them once or more daily. Patients who monitored their glucose levels more frequently had significantly fewer complications (p = 0.002). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was the best monitoring method, as it demonstrated the lowest rate of complications compared to other methods (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent glucose monitoring and the use of CGM devices were associated with a decreased number of DM complications. Thus, we recommend that physicians encourage patients to perform CGM as it helps increase the frequency of monitoring.
